Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 31 August 2009
Published in Agron J 101:1204-1218 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2009.0002
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leifeld, J.
Right arrow Articles by Oberholzer, H.-R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leifeld, J.
Right arrow Articles by Oberholzer, H.-R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leifeld, J.
Right arrow Articles by Oberholzer, H.-R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Isotopes
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Organic farming
Right arrow Agricultural Systems
Right arrow Soil Chemistry
Right arrow Animal Waste

ORGANIC PRODUCTION

Consequences of Conventional versus Organic farming on Soil Carbon: Results from a 27-Year Field Experiment

Jens Leifeld*, René Reiser and Hans-Rudolf Oberholzer

Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland

* Corresponding author (jens.leifeld{at}art.admin.ch).

Organic farming practices are regarded as being beneficial for the environment by promoting soil quality and sequestering soil organic carbon (SOC). We studied SOC dynamics in the long-term field experiment DOK in Switzerland. The experiment compares three organically fertilized treatments under conventional (CONFYM), bioorganic (BIOORG), and biodynamic (BIODYN) management, and two systems with (CONMIN) or without (NOFERT) mineral fertilizer. We analyzed measured SOC time series from 1977 to 2004 and applied soil fractionation, radiocarbon dating, and modeling with the carbon model RothC. The SOC declined significantly in most parcels, but was not systematically different between systems. Initial SOC contents correlated with soil texture and were identified as being important with respect to the change rate. The SOC loss was at the expense of mineral-associated carbon whereas the more labile fractions increased. The overall decline was explained by reduced carbon inputs since commencement of the experiment and was most pronounced in NOFERT and CONMIN. The model satisfactorily simulated the dynamics of most of the treatments for both initialization with equilibrium runs or measured SOC fractions. Carbon loss in CONFYM was not fully captured by the model. Composition of organic fertilizers depended on the particular management, and a model adjustment of their relative stability improved the match between model and measurements. Model runs without management effects indicated that the observed increase in temperatures at the experimental site does not induce a change in SOC. Overall, the study does not support a benefit of organic farming on SOC contents compared with conventional systems with manure.

Abbreviations: AMS, accelerator mass spectrometry • BIO, microbial biomass • BIODYN, biodynamic farming • BIOORG, bioorganic farming • CONFYM, conventional farming with farmyard manure • CONMIN, conventional mineral fertilizer • Db, bulk density • DOC, dissolved organic carbon • DPM, decomposable plant litter pool • HUM, humified organic matter • IOM, inert organic matter • NOFERT, no fertilization • POM, particulate organic matter • RothC, Rothamsted carbon model • RPM, resistant plant material • rSOC, oxidation residue • SOC, soil organic carbon • S+A, sand and microaggregate fraction • s+c silt and clay fraction

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication January 8, 2009.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy.