Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 31 October 2006
Published in Agron J 98:1664 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0220le
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manoranjan, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Manoranjan, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, G. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Manoranjan, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, G. S.

Letters to the Editor

Comment on "Modeling Sensible and Latent Heat Transport in Crop and Residue Canopies" by G.S. Campbell. Agron. J. 95:1388–1392 (2003).

Valipuram S. Manoranjana, Armen R. Kemanianb, Ryan L. Orozcoc and Gaylon S. Campbelld

a College of Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-3520
b Blackland Research and Extension Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, 720 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502
c Department of Mechanical Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2920
d Decagon Devices, 950 N.E. Nelson Ct., Pullman, WA 99163

mano{at}wsu.edu

armen{at}brc.tamus.edu

ryanorozco{at}hotmail.com

gaylon{at}decagon.com

Received for publication August 1, 2006.
Dear Editor:

In an article published in Agronomy Journal, Campbell (2003) proposed a set of uncoupled equations to deal with latent and sensible heat flux. The fluxes proposed are enthalpy (H) and isothermal latent heat ({lambda}Ei) and the new driving forces are equivalent temperature and vapor pressure deficit. In the derivation method, however, there was an error in the mathematical manipulation of one of the equations. The objective of this letter is to correct that error and to show the correct set of uncoupled equations.

Campbell (2003) defined latent heat flux as (Eq. [3] in the original paper)

Formula 1[1]
where {lambda} (J mol–1) is the water latent heat of vaporization, E (mol m–2 s–1) is the water vapor flux density, {rho} is the air molar density (mol m–3), Kv (m2 s–1) is the vapor diffusivity, h is relative humidity, es (kPa) is the saturation vapor pressure at air temperature, p (kPa) is the atmospheric pressure, and z (m) is distance.

Campbell substituted {Delta}dT/dz for des/dz where {Delta} is the slope of the saturation vapor pressure function (kPa °C–1) and T is temperature (°C). He also proposed that since the vapor pressure deficit D (kPa) is defined as D = es(1 – h), differentiating and rearranging terms appropriately provides a substitution for the derivative term dh/dz. However, there was an error in the derivation, where Campbell obtained dh/dz = 1/es x dD/dz. Substituting in Eq. [1] he obtained (Eq. [4] in the original paper)

Formula 2[2]

The correct differentiation of D yields Formula 2 = Formula 2Formula 2 since both es and D vary with z. Equation [2] (Eq. [4] in the original paper) therefore becomes

Formula 3[3]

Equation [3] expresses that the latent heat flux depends on the vapor pressure deficit (or {lambda}Ei, the second term on the right of the equation) and temperature gradients, without any involvement of h. This correction changes the decoupled Eq. [8] (latent heat flux) and Eq. [9] (sensible heat flux) of Campbell (2003) to the standard Penman–Monteith forms:

Formula 4[4]

Formula 5[5]
where s = Formula 5 (K–1), {gamma}* = Formula 5 and where cp is the specific heat of air (J mol–1 K).

Editor's note: Through a series of events, Valipuram S. Manoranjan, Armen R. Kemanian, and Ryan L. Orozco discovered an error in the mathematical manipulation of one of the equations in the article by Campbell (2003). Dr. Kemanian subsequently contacted Dr. Campbell regarding this error and the correct derivation. These authors and Dr. Campbell have jointly prepared this Letter to the Editor. All authors have agreed on the content of the letter so there is no separate reply from Dr. Campbell.

REFERENCES





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manoranjan, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Manoranjan, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, G. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Manoranjan, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, G. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome