Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


Fig. 4. (A) Relative kernel number per unit land area as a function of the relative amount of intercepted photosynthetic active radiation (IPAR) during the period around silking. Kernel number of each treatment was expressed as a proportion of the maximum kernel number recorded in each experiment (7460, 6053, 4181, and 4557 kernels m–2 for E1, E2, E3, and E4, respectively). The IPAR was also expressed as a proportion of the maximum IPAR registered in each experiment (218.6, 317.2, 343.7, and 357.6 MJ m–2 for E1, E2, E3, and E4, respectively). (B) Kernel number per square meter as a function of crop growth (CG) rate during the period around silking in E2. Data points represent the mean values of each treatment (plant population x row spacing x hybrid). Symbols as in Fig. 3. The solid lines indicate the model fitted to the data set.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome