Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published in Agron J 98:443-450 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0066
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clay, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ellsbury, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clay, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ellsbury, M. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Clay, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ellsbury, M. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Isotopes
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Site-Specific Analysis
Right arrow Soil Conservation

Soil and Crop Management

Theoretical Derivation of Stable and Nonisotopic Approaches for Assessing Soil Organic Carbon Turnover

D. E. Claya,*, C. G. Carlsona, S. A. Claya, C. Reesea, Z. Liua, J. Changa and M. M. Ellsburyb

a Plant Science Dep., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007
b USDA-ARS, Northern Grain Insect Research Lab., Brookings, SD 57006

* Corresponding author (david.clay{at}sdstate.edu)

Received for publication March 4, 2005.

   ABSTRACT
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Techniques for measuring soil organic C (SOC) turnover in production fields are needed. The objectives of this study were to propose and test nonisotopic and 13C stable isotopic techniques for assessing SOC turnover. Based on SOC equilibrium and mass balance relationships, an equation was derived: NHC/SOCinitial = [1/(SOC x kNHC)](dSOC/dt) + kSOC/kNHC, where dSOC/dt is the annual change in SOC, NHC is nonharvested C returned to soil, kSOC is the annual mineralization rate of SOC, and kNHC is the annual mineralization rate of NHC. This equation was used to calculate maintenance rates. An isotopic approach based on simultaneously solving the equations was developed to determine C budgets: (i) SOCretained = [SOCfinal ({Delta}soil final – {Delta}PCR)/({Delta}SOCretained – {Delta}PCR)]; (ii) {Delta}SOC retained = {Delta}soc initial – [{varepsilon} ln(SOCretained/SOCinitial)], (iii) {Delta}PCR = {Delta}NHC – [{varepsilon} ln(PCR/NHC)]; and (iv) SOCfinal = SOCretained + PCRincorp, where {varepsilon} is the Rayleigh fractionation constant, PCRincorp is the amount of NHC incorporated into SOCfinal with {Delta}PCR being the associated 13C discrimination ({Delta}) value, and SOCretained is the amount of SOCinitial retained in the soil after mineralization with {Delta}SOC retained being the associated {Delta} value. Isotopic and nonisotopic approaches were tested on a production field where aboveground corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yields were measured with a yield monitor and soil samples collected from a slightly offset grid (30 m) in 1995 and 2003 were analyzed for organic C and {Delta}. The nonisotopic approach showed that maintenance rates increased with SOC and that an accurate measure of NHC was required to calculate maintenance requirements. Sensitivity analysis of the isotopic approach showed that calculated budgets were sensitive to 13C discrimination during SOC mineralization. If 13C discrimination during SOC and NHC mineralization did not occur ({varepsilon} = 0), then 14.9 and 7.6% of the SOC measured in 1995 (SOCinitial) was mineralized, and 7420 and 2780 kg C ha–1 of NHC were incorporated into SOCfinal in the 523.4- to 527.3- and 527.3- to 529.2-m elevation zones, respectively. If 13C discrimination occurred ({varepsilon} = –2.52{per thousand}) during SOC mineralization, then the calculated amount of SOC mineralized and the amount of new C incorporated into SOC were reduced.

Abbreviations: {Delta}, 13C discrimination value • NHC, nonharvested C • PCR, plant biomass C remaining in the soil • SOC, soil organic C


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
TO reduce our dependence on fossil fuels, it has been proposed that most of the aboveground corn biomass be harvested for ethanol production. To ensure that corn stover harvesting does not degrade the soil resource, SOC inputs must equal outputs. The current approaches for defining C budgets and maintenance rates have limitations (they require a reference site, do not consider 13C discrimination during mineralization, and are difficult to apply to the whole field) that reduce their usefulness at field and watershed scales.

Both isotopic and nonisotopic approaches have been used to define SOC dynamics. Nonisotopic approaches have relied on changes in nonharvested biomass C returned to the soil or changes in tillage to produce changes in SOC (Larson et al., 1972; Barber, 1979; West and Post, 2002). Based on these changes, the amount of nonharvested biomass returned to the soil required to maintain SOC are calculated. Major disadvantages with the nonisotope approach are that C losses and gains are determined by subtracting two large numbers (initial and final SOC values) containing large spatial variability, SOC derived from C4 and C3 plants cannot be separated, and measuring belowground biomass is difficult.

The 13C stable isotope approach has been used to separate SOC into C derived from C3 and C4 plants. This approach relies on the observation that C3 and C4 plants have different {Delta} values. While C3 plants typically have {Delta} values ranging from 17 to 20{per thousand}, C4 plants have {Delta} values ranging from 2.5 to 4{per thousand} (Clay et al., 2001b, 2003). Based on isotopic differences between C3 and C4 plants, a mixing equation [f = ({Delta}SOC – {Delta}C4)/({Delta}C3 – {Delta}C4)] has been used to calculate the relative proportion of C3 and C4 biomass contained in SOC (Huggins et al., 1998; Allmaras et al., 2000; Clapp et al., 2000; Layese et al., 2002; Allmaras et al., 2004). By repeated sampling, the rate of change in the SOC derived from C3 and C4 plants is determined. This approach works best when a soil derived from C3 plants is switched to C4 plants or vice versa. These calculations assume that 13C fractionation during mineralization does not occur. If this approach is combined with experiments containing paired treatments, i.e., residue removed and returned, then by subtraction the SOC derived from stover and roots can be calculated (Allmaras et al., 2004). Disadvantages are that many years are required to conduct these experiments, potential fractionation must be considered, and turnover rates cannot be calculated if the rotation includes both C3 and C4 plants.

Changes in C storage can also be determined in systems where the species composition or management has changed (Balesdent and Mariotti, 1996). This approach requires a reference site where the original vegetation or management is maintained. Calculations are based on {Delta} differences in the perturbed and unperturbed sites [F = ({Delta}soil final – {Delta} soil reference final)/({Delta}vegetation – {Delta}vegetation reference). By repeated sampling, this approach is a direct expression of the turnover rate relative to the reference. Disadvantages are that an appropriate reference site must be maintained, and calculated values are not absolute and are relative to the reference site.

The data and treatment requirements of the current approaches for assessing SOC dynamics make them unsuitable for assessing SOC dynamics in many production fields. The objectives of this study were to propose and test nonisotopic and 13C stable isotopic techniques for assessing SOC turnover.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Method Development
Theoretical Derivation of Nonisotopic Approach
Based on a summary of data presented by West and Post (2002), Allmaras et al. (2004), Clapp et al. (2000), and Wilhelm et al. (2004), it can be derived that at or near the SOC equilibrium point (SOCe),

Formula 1[1]

Formula 2[2]

Formula 3[3]
where kSOC is the annual mineralization rate (kg C ha–1 yr–1) of SOC, kNHC is the annual mineralization rate of nonharvested C (kg C ha–1 yr–1) returned to the soil, NHCm is the amount of nonharvested C required to maintain SOC at SOCe (kg ha–1), dSOC/dt (kg C ha–1 yr–1) is the annual change in soil organic C (kg C ha–1 yr–1), and NHCa (kg ha–1) is the total amount of nonharvested C returned to the soil (kg ha–1). By solving for NHCm in Eq. [1], substituting this value [SOCe(kSOC/kNHC)] for NHCm in Eq. [3], solving for (NHCa – NHCm) in Eq. [2], substituting this value [(1/kNHC)(dSOC/dt)] for [NHCa – NHCm] in Eq. [3], and dividing both sides by SOCe, the equation

Formula 4[4]
was derived. If SOCinitial is near SOCe, then SOCinitial is approximately equal to SOCe, resulting in the equation

Formula 5[5]
This equation was rewritten into

Formula 6[6]
which can be solved using linear regression. The values of NHCm, kNHC, and kSOC are calculated using the equations

Formula 7[7]

Formula 8[8]

Formula 9[9]

Isotopic-Based Carbon Budgets
An approach for calculating SOC budgets for systems containing both C3 and C4 plants is described below. The approach is based on changes in soil {Delta} with time, the {Delta} value of added plant material, and modeling. This approach can be used to determine SOC dynamics at specific points. By mass balance, the {Delta} value of SOC at the end of an experiment ({Delta}soil final) was defined as

Formula 10[10]
where PCRincorp is the plant C retained in the soil that was incorporated into SOC, {Delta}PCR is the {Delta} value of the plant material retained in the soil after mineralization (for calculations see below), SOCretained is the amount of old C (SOCinitial) retained in the soil at the end of the study, and {Delta}SOC retained is the associated {Delta} value. By mass balance SOCfinal is

Formula 11[11]
By simultaneously solving Eq. [10] and [11], the equation

Formula 12[12]
was derived. This equation can be rearranged into the form PCRincorp = SOCfinal({Delta}soil final – {Delta}soc retained)/({Delta}PCR – {Delta}SOC retained). This expression is similar to Eq. [2] reported by Balesdent and Mariotti (1996), and the equation SOCcorn = (SOCfinal)({Delta}soil final – {Delta}soil initial)/({Delta}corn stover – {Delta}soil initial) used by Clapp et al. (2000) and Allmaras et al. (2004). Differences between the two equations are beyond the scope of this study and are discussed in Balesdent et al. (1988) and Balesdent and Mariotti (1996).

If 13C discrimination during mineralization occurs, then Balesdent and Mariotti (1996) reported that {Delta}SOC retained was calculated with the Rayleigh fractionation equation: {Delta}SOC retained = {[{Delta}soc initial – ({varepsilon} ln(SOCretained/SOCinitial)]}. The {varepsilon} value represents a Rayleigh isotopic fractionation constant. If {varepsilon} is equal to zero (no isotopic discrimination), then {Delta}SOC retained simplifies to {Delta}SOC initial and {Delta}PCR simplifies to the {Delta} value of the added plant material. Evidence supporting isotopic discrimination during mineralization is mixed. Santruckova et al. (2000) reported that {delta}13C of respired CO2 was similar to the {delta}13C value of SOC and Connin et al. (2001) reported that 13C isotopic discrimination is characteristic of early litter decay in arid environments. Balesdent and Mariotti (1996) summarized the unpublished work of M. Linères (1996), in which the {delta}13C value of the initial corn biomass did not change after 85% of the biomass had been mineralized. During the mineralization of trichlorobenzene, stable 13C isotope fractionation was not observed under aerobic conditions but was observed under anaerobic conditions (Griebler et al., 2004). Cleveland et al. (2004) reported that the {delta}13C signatures of dissolved organic matter did not change during decomposition. Fernandez and Cadisch (2003) reported that, with time, fractionation may even out, with microbes discriminating against 13C (relative to the initial label) during early stages followed by a period of time when microbes discriminate against 12C (relative to the initial label). Balesdent and Mariotti (1996) reported that, based on temporal changes in {delta}13C and SOC for 70 yr in fallowed plots located in France, {varepsilon} was calculated to be –1.71{per thousand}. Carbon budgets were developed by simultaneously solving Eq. [11] and [12] and the Rayleigh fractionation equation. The amount of initial C lost during the study was then calculated using the equation

Formula 13[13]
The sensitivity of the approaches was tested using a range of root/shoot ratios. Although only C budgets where {varepsilon} = 0 are reported here, the sensitivity of calculated C budgets to {varepsilon} was investigated.

Field Experiment
Data between 1995 and 2003 from a site located in east-central South Dakota in a 65-ha field located at 44°10'N and 96°37'W were used to test the approaches described above. Corn was sown in 1995, 1997, 1999, 2001, and 2002, and soybean was sown in 1996, 1998, and 2000. Cultural practices are shown in Table 1. To reduce residue interference with corn following corn (2001 and 2002), between 50 and 75% of the corn stover in 2001 was chopped, windrowed, bailed, and removed. Residue was not removed between 2002 and 2003. The amounts of N and P fertilizer applied, growing degree days (base 10°C), varieties, and precipitation for each study year are summarized in Table 1. Tile lines were repaired between 1996 and 1997. For comparative purposes, oven-dry soybean and corn dry weights are reported. Selected soil chemical and physical properties at the site were summarized in Clay et al. (2001a, 2001b, 2004). Corn and soybean {Delta} values for different elevations were reported by Clay et al. (2001b, 2003).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Cultural and climatic information for the study area between 1995 and 2002.

 
Soil samples from the 0- to 15-cm soil depth were collected from a 30- by 30-m offset grid in May 1995 and between May and June in 2003. Each sample was a composite that contained 15 individual 1.7-cm-diam. cores collected every 11.4 cm along a transect. Soil samples were air dried (35°C), ground, sieved (2-mm sieve), and analyzed for total N, total C, {delta}15N, and {Delta} on a ratio mass spectrometer (Clay et al., 2001b). Total C was corrected for inorganic C (Loeppert and Suarez, 1996). The values of {Delta} and {delta}15N were calculated using the equations

Formula 14[14]


Formula 15

[15]


Formula 16

[16]


Formula 17

[17]
where limestone from the Pee Dee formation in South Carolina was used as the Rstandard for C, {delta}13Ca is the 13C natural abundance for air (–8{per thousand}), {delta}13Cp is the 13C natural abundance for the sample, and 0.0036765 (air) was used for 15N/14Nstandard (O'Leary, 1993).

More than 600 soil samples were collected at each sampling date in 1995 and 2003. The soil samples from each year were aggregated to a common 40- by 40-m grid cell. The value of a grid cell was calculated as the average value of all the samples contained within a cell. A grid cell SOC value was the difference between inorganic (measured on the 1995 data set) and total C. The grid cells were separated into five elevation-based management zones (<523.4, 523.4–527.3, 527.3–529.74, 529.74–532.2, and 532.2–534.30 m, Fig. 1 ).


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. The location of the elevation-zone boundaries in the field.

 
Quantification of Yield and Carbon Inputs
Fifty geographically representative sites along four transects were identified for characterizing temporal and spatial yield variability. Corn stover was hand harvested from 2.29 m of row at each site in 1995, 1997, 1999, 2001, and 2002. Corn grain yields at these sites were measured and spatially located by a combine equipped with a calibrated yield monitor and differentially corrected global positioning system (DGPS). The combine head was 4.2 m before 2002 and 6.1 m after 2002. To ensure yield monitor data accuracy, data points were removed from the data set if the combine speed was slower than 1.78 m s–1, faster than 3.05 m s–1, or if the flow rate exceeded ±3 standard deviations of the average flow rate. In 2002, corn grain yields were determined by hand harvesting 4.58 m of row. Corn grain and stover samples were dried, ground, and analyzed for total N, {delta}15N, total C, and {Delta} as described above. Based on the measured C content of the corn stover, which ranged from 40 to 42%, biomass C was calculated by multiplying nonharvested biomass by 0.409.

In 1996, 1998, and 2000, soybean yields were measured at the 50 sites described above with a calibrated yield monitor equipped with DGPS. The soybean head on the combine was 9.1 m. Soybean grain samples were collected by hand from 1-m2 areas at the 50 representative sampling points in 2000. These samples were analyzed for total N, {delta}15N, total C, and {Delta} as described above. Based on related experiments conducted in this field or at nearby sites in 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, nonharvestable (leaves, pods, and stalks) materials were estimated using a measured harvest index of 0.35 (grain/nonharvestable material). Grain, leaf, and stalk samples were analyzed for organic C and {Delta}. Based on measured soybean leaves and stalks, which ranged from 40 to 41%, nonharvestable biomass C was calculated by multiplying biomass returned by 0.405. Carbon inputs and yields were determined for the elevation-based management zones described above.

Belowground productivity has been estimated from aboveground productivity using the equation

Formula 18[18]
Wilts et al. (2004) reported that, for corn, k values ranged from 1.14 to 1.17. Some studies have reported lower values (Buyanousky and Wagner, 1997, Clapp et al., 2000) while other studies have reported higher values (Allmaras et al., 2004). Different k values are the direct result of different techniques used to measure belowground biomass. Approaches that measure root exudates have higher k values than approaches that do not measure exudates (Bolinder et al., 1999). Plant data were aggregated to the five elevation-based management zones. Means, standard deviations, and 90% confidence intervals were calculated and semivariances of the SOC and {Delta} values were determined. For corn, belowground biomass was determined for a range of root/shoot ratios (none, 0.0; low, 0.4; moderate, 0.8; and high, 1.5). For soybean, belowground biomass was simulated using a slightly different range of root/shoot ratios (none, 0.0; low, 0.4; moderate, 1.00; and high, 1.5).

A mixing equation as described by Allmaras et al. (2004) was used to calculate the relative contribution of soybean (f) and corn (1 – f) plants to SOC. The amount of SOC derived from C3 (SOCC3, from soybean) or C4 (SOCC4, from corn) was calculated by multiplying SOC by f and (1 – f), respectively. Equations [11] and [12] were used to calculate the amount of SOC mineralized (SOCinitial lost) the amount of initial SOC retained in the soil after mineralization, and new C that was incorporated into the SOC (PCRincorp).

To solve Eq. [12], a value for {Delta}PCR was required. This value was calculated using the equation

Formula 19[19]
where PCRC4-C,t is C4 biomass C (kg) applied in year t remaining in the soil after mineralization and {Delta}PCR C4,t is the associated {Delta} value of this biomass, PCRC3-C is C3 biomass C (kg) applied in year t remaining in the soil after mineralization and {Delta}PCR C3,t is the associated {Delta} value, and PCR is defined below. The {Delta}PCR C3,t and {Delta}PCR C4,t values are landscape specific. For example, based on measured corn stover {Delta} values in 2001 and 2002, the {Delta}C4 used in Eq. [4] ranged from 3.5{per thousand} (elevation zones <523.4 m) to 3.92{per thousand} (elevation zones >532.2 m) (Clay et al., 2001b), and based on soybean grain {Delta} values in 2000 that were partially reported in Clay et al. (2003), the input values used for {Delta}C3 in Eq. [19] ranged from 19.93{per thousand} (elevation zones <523.4 m) to 18.72{per thousand} (elevation zones >532.2 m). The {Delta}PCR C4,t and {Delta}PCR C3,t values in Eq. [19] were estimated using the equations

Formula 20[20]

Formula 21[21]
In Eq. [20] and [21], {varepsilon} is the Rayleigh fractionation coefficient, which was assumed to be zero, {Delta}C4,t is the {Delta} value of C4 biomass from year t, {Delta}C3,t is the {Delta} value of C3 biomass from year t, BPt is the nonharvested biomass C (kg) returned to the soil in year t (Balesdent and Mariotti, 1996). The PCRC4-C,t and PCRC3-C,t values in Eq. [19], [20], and [21] were calculated using the double exponential model

Formula 22[22]
where NHCa,t represents the nonharvested biomass C returned to the soil in any given year, PCRt represents the amount of plant C remaining in the soil after mineralization, A represents the percentage of easily decomposable plant C, and k is the associated decomposition rate constant of pool A, C represents the percentage of biomass that was resistant to mineralization, and h is the associated rate constant of pool C. The A, k, C, and h values, based on data reported by Buyanousky and Wagner (1997) and Angers and Chenu (1997), were 79.6%, 0.003271 d, 20.73%, and 0.000433 d, respectively. This model predicted that 41.8, 12.8, and 6.1% of the biomass mass added in 2002, 1999, and 1995, respectively, was retained in the soil in June of 2003. Even though short-term mineralization rates are plant-type dependent (Trinsoutrot et al., 2000), this study used the same model to estimate corn and soybean biomass remaining in the soil during the 8-yr period. This assumption was based on the lack of long-term (at least 8 yr) field mineralization data to dispute this simplification.

Based on Eq. [19], [20], and [21], the estimated {Delta}PCR values in the moderate root/shoot ratio treatment were 6.36, 6.28, 6.47, 6.50, and 6.47{per thousand} for the <523.4, 523.4- to 527.3-, 527.3- to 529.7-, 529.7- to 532.2-, and 532.2- to 534.3-m elevation zones. The high and low root/shoot ratios were within 0.3{per thousand} of these values. For the isotopic approach, root/shoot ratio influence on calculated C budgets was limited to their impact on {Delta}PCR.


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Effects on Carbon Dynamics
In 1995, SOC ranged from 48760 kg C ha–1 in the 532.2- to 534.3-m zone to 52 600 kg C ha–1 in the <523.4-m zone; {Delta} ranged from a low value of 9.04{per thousand} in the 527.3- to 529.7-m zone to a high value of 9.72{per thousand} in the 529.7- to 532.2-m zone. The {Delta} values of these zones decreased during the 8 yr of the study, resulting in {Delta} values of 8.98 and 9.06{per thousand} in the 527.3- to 529.7- and 529.7- to 532.2-m zones, respectively. Total soil N ranged from a high of 2.55 g kg–1 in the elevation zone <523.4 m to a low of 2.41 g kg–1 in the elevation zone >529.7 m. Decreases in SOC and total soil N with increasing elevation were attributed to erosion, which transported organic matter from summit and shoulder areas to footslope areas, and lower water contents in summit and shoulder areas than footslope and toestope areas, which reduced biomass production and the amount of biomass returned to the soil.

Soil organic C and {Delta} values in 1995 contained a substantial amount of spatial variability (Fig. 2 ). For {Delta}, the semivariance value at 40 m was ~50% of the value at 300 m. For SOC, spatial variability was also observed, with the semivariance values at 40 m being 54% of the sill. Changes in {Delta} during the 8 yr of the study were spatially variable and had a linear semivariogram of y = 0.093 + 0.0001483x, r2 = 0.88 at P = 0.01, where y is the semivariance value ({per thousand}) and x is distance (m). Backslope and shoulder areas had relatively constant {Delta} values from 1995 to 2003, whereas relatively large changes in {Delta} were observed in elevation zones <523.4 m (Fig. 3 ). Spatial variability in SOC and {Delta} were driven by landscape and management processes that influenced SOC and {Delta} values.


Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Semivariograms for SOC (soil organic C) and soil 13C discrimination for 1995. Units for SOC are kilograms C per hectare and units for 13C discrimination are per-thousand.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. The change in soil 13C discrimination ({per thousand}) from 1995 to 2003.

 
Organic Carbon Inputs
Crop yields and the amount of biomass C returned to the field were influenced by spatial and temporal variability. The lowest corn yields were measured in the cool wet year of 1995 (3660–4330 kg biomass grain ha–1) and the highest yields (7190–10 5560 biomass grain kg ha–1) were measured in 2002 (Table 1). Soybean grain yields had similar temporal variability and averaged 1410, 2240, and 2510 kg ha–1 in 1996, 1998, and 2000, respectively. The low yields in 1996 were associated with cool and wet conditions (Table 1), while high yields in 2000 were attributed to timely precipitation.

Estimated nonharvested C returned to soil was higher for corn than soybean and was influenced by elevation zone and root/shoot ratio (Table 2). For the moderate root/shoot ratio, the average estimated amount of above- and belowground organic C returned to the soil by corn ranged from 6930 to 8170 kg C ha–1 yr–1. An interesting comparison between the 529.74- to 532.2 and >532.2-m soil zones shows that measured stover production was similar in the two areas, whereas grain yields were 15% less in the elevation zone >532.2 m. The lower harvest index in the >532.2-m than the 529.74- to 532.2-m elevation zone was attributed to differential water stress, which was higher in summit than footslope areas (Clay et al., 2001b, 2003).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. The influence of elevation zone on the average annual amount of biomass C returned to soil or harvested. For corn, grain and stover yields were experimentally measured and nonharvested (crown, roots, exudates) estimates were based on root/shoot ratios of 0, 0.4 (low), 0.8(moderate), and 1.5 (high). For soybean, grain was measured, residue returned was calculated from a 0.35 harvest index, and root biomass was estimated with root/shoot ratios of 0, 0.4 (low), 1.0 (moderate), and high (1.5).

 
The estimated average amount of nonharvestable soybean C returned to soil increased with root/shoot ratio (Table 2). For the moderate root/shoot ratio, the estimated amount of C returned to the soil by corn was 1.5 times more than that returned by soybean. This value was similar to the 1.4 ratio (corn/soybean returned) reported by Huggins et al. (1998).

The {Delta} values of organic materials returned to the soil were influenced by landscape position (Clay et al., 2001b, 2003). The landscape dependence of the {Delta} values was the direct result of water stress. In corn, water stress increased {Delta} values while the opposite was true for soybean. For example, stover {Delta} values in 2001 and 2002 averaged 3.5, 3.6, 3.75, 3.8, and 3.92{per thousand} in the <523.4-, 523.4- to 527.1-, 527.1- to 529.7-, 529.7- to 532.2-, and 532- to 534.3-m elevation zones, respectively. Soybean grain had different results and in 2000 averaged 19.93, 19.75, 19.4, 19.2, and 18.7{per thousand} in the <523.4-, 523.4- to 527.1-, 527.1- to 529.7-, 529.7- to 532.2-, and 532- to 534.3-m elevation zones, respectively.

Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization Kinetics
Nonisotopic Maintenance Rate Calculations
To maintain soil productivity, the amount of postharvest residues returned to soil must exceed the maintenance rate (Bolinder et al., 1999; Ortega et al., 2002; Prakash et al., 2002). Elevation zone did not influence the relationship between NHC/SOC and dSOC/dt. For the moderate root/shoot ratio, the whole-field linear relationship between NHC/SOC and dSOC/dt was NHC/SOC = dSOC/dt(2.66 x 10–5 ± 1.22 x 10–5) + 0.121 (±0.004), r = 0.55 at P = 0.01. This relationship suggests that to maintain SOC levels in the 0- to 15-cm soil depth, 12% of the SOC or 6200 kg NHC ha–1 must be applied annually. Root/shoot ratios influenced the maintenance rates and the kSOC and kNHC values calculated from the y intercept and slope values. Calculated maintenance rates were proportionally related to the estimated NHC returned to soil, i.e., the higher the root/shoot ratio, the higher the estimated maintenance rate. Findings from this analysis showed that accurate estimates of belowground biomass and the influence of residue placement on mineralization rates are required to determine maintenance rates.

Data from Allmaras et al. (2004) were used to test the feasibility of using Eq. [6] to assess C dynamics in a system where belowground biomass is better understood. In this study, C inputs and changes in SOC levels during a 13-yr period were measured. Tillage treatments were no-tillage, moldboard plow, and chisel plow. Nitrogen was applied at two rates (0 and 200 kg N ha–1) and stover was either removed or left in place. The statistically significant (0.01 level) model relating NHC and SOC was NHC/SOC = 0.0644(±0.015) – (2.72 x 10–5 ± 2.36 x 10–5)(dSOC/dt). Based on this equation: (i) it was estimated that the annual maintenance rate for this soil was 6200 kg C ha–1 yr–1 (0.0644 x 96250 kg C ha–1); (ii) 39% [=100 x 1/(96250 x 2.72 x 10–5)] of the nonharvested biomass was mineralized in the first year after application, and (iii) 2.51% (=100 x 0.0644 x 0.39) of the SOC was mineralized annually. This maintenance rate was consistent with values reported in the literature (Kaboneka et al., 1997). Jenkinson and Rayner (1977) reported that in Rothamsted, England, 1200 to 1900 kg C ha–1 yr–1 from wheat (Triticum aesitivum L.) straw was sufficient to maintain SOC levels. In Iowa, Larson et al. (1972) estimated that 1.9% of SOC was mineralized annually and that annual applications of 6000 kg biomass ha–1 (~2500 kg C ha–1) are needed to maintain SOC levels. Barber (1979) used changes in SOC duirng 12 yr in production and fallow fields to determine that 2.4% of the SOC was decomposed each year, 11% of the residue C was synthesized into new organic matter, and annual applications of at least 4000 kg C ha–1 were needed to maintain SOC levels at 17.4 g C kg–1 soil. In Minnesota, Huggins et al. (1998) used a simulation model combined with changes in {Delta} to determine that annual applications of 5600 kg C ha–1 yr–1 are needed to maintain surface soil (0–15 cm) at 45 000 kg C ha–1.

Isotopic Approaches: Relative Proportion of C3 and C4 Plants in Soil Organic Carbon
Changes in the f values, as calculated with the equation f = ({Delta}SOC – {Delta}C4)/({Delta}C3 – {Delta}C4), from 1993 to 2003 suggest that: (i) the contribution of C3 biomass to SOC generally decreased from 1993 to 2003; and (ii) the contribution from C4 plants to SOC increased at elevation zones <527.3 m and remained unchanged at elevation zones >527.3 m (Fig. 4 ). These results were attributed to corn, a C4 plant, being sown five times while soybean, a C3 plant, was sown three times. If only C3 or C4 plants had been grown, this information would be very useful; however, in this case both C3 and C4 plants were grown and the mineralization kinetics were confounded.


Figure 4
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. The influence of sampling date and elevation zone on SOC (soil organic C) derived from C3 and C4 plants. Brackets represent the t value at the 0.1 significance level.

 
Isotopic Approaches: Carbon Budgets
Five values, SOCsoil retained, SOCfinal, SOCinitial, {Delta}SOC retained, and {Delta}PCR were needed to calculate the effect of elevation zone on C budgets (Eq. [11], [12], and [13]). To test the sensitivity of the approach to belowground biomass estimates, a range of root/shoot ratios were tested. The tested root/shoot ratios had minimal and inconsistent impact on {Delta}PCR values and calculated C budgets.

For the moderate root/shoot ratio when {varepsilon} = 0, the amount of C mineralized and new C incorporated into the soil was related to the change in soil {Delta} values during 8 yr (Table 3). Elevation-zone differences in new C incorporated into SOC, the amount of C lost, and the percentage of C mineralized was determined (Table 3). More than twice as much new C was incorporated into SOCfinal in the 523.4- to 527.3-m elevation zone (7420 kg C ha–1) than the 527.3- to 529.3-m elevation zone (2780 kg C ha–1). During the study, approximately 14.9% of SOCinitial in the 523.4- to 527.3-m elevation (14.9%) was mineralized, which was double the amount mineralized in the 527.3- to 529.7-m zone (7.6%). The difference between the net amount of SOC mineralized and new C incorporated indicates that there was a small loss of C (460 ± 416 kg C ha–1) from the field. Landscape differences were attributed to: (i) water stress, which influenced root and shoot growth characteristics; (ii) runoff, which may have transported soil and crop residues from summit and shoulder areas to footslope areas; and (iii) tile-line repairs, which may have produced conditions that encouraged SOC mineralization. Other researchers have noted that management can influence C mineralization rates (Torbert et al., 2000; Halvorson et al., 2002; West and Post, 2002).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. The influence of elevation zone on the amount of soil organic C (SOC) contained in the soil in 1995, the change in 13C discrimination ({Delta}) during the 8 yr of the study, the amount of relict SOC retained in the soil after mineralization, the amount of new C incorporated into SOC, and the amount of SOC mineralized. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) are shown.

 
The different root/shoot ratios had almost identical impacts on calculated C budgets (data not shown). For example, the new C incorporated into SOCfinal in 0- to 15-cm soil depth was 5800, 6900, 2600, 2700, and 5900 kg C ha–1 for the high root/shoot ratio. These values were within 500 kg C ha–1 of the values reported for the moderate root/shoot ratio (Table 3). For the isotopic approach, {Delta}NHC, not root/shoot ratios, had a direct impact on calculated C budgets.

Sensitively analysis showed that if 13C discrimination during SOC mineralization occurred ({varepsilon} = –2.52{per thousand}), then the amount of SOC mineralization and new C incorporated into SOC were 3500 and 2840 kg C ha–1, respectively. These findings suggest that, in C balance studies, 13C discrimination during relict C mineralization should be measured. This can be accomplished by including plots where plant growth is prevented.


   CONCLUSIONS
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
 
Using previous C budget analysis approaches, the landscape dependency of the cropping system could not be directly assessed. Fractionating the soil into C3 and C4 components produced inconclusive results (Allmaras et al., 2004), and the approach requiring the maintenance of numerous reference sites at numerous landscape positions, as explained by Balesdent and Mariotti (1996) and Balesdent et al. (1988), was not practical. This study provides an alternative approach to assess SOC dynamics in fields containing substantial variability. The nonisotopic approach, using moderate root/shoot ratios, estimated that 6200 kg C ha–1 was required for SOC maintenance. Calculated maintenance rates were directly proportional to estimated NHC and root/shoot ratios.

Equations [11], [12], and [13] have distinct differences from the equations used to calculate f (Allmaras et al., 2004) and F (Balesdent and Mariotti, 1996). First, 13C discrimination during mineralization can be integrated, if necessary, into the calculations. Second, Eq. [11], [12], and [13] do not require a reference site and spatial variability was implicitly considered. Third, absolute values rather than relative values were calculated. Fourth, the approach can be used to estimate C budgets for systems containing both C3 and C4 plants.

The modified 13C natural abundance approach was used to quantify landscape effects on SOC mineralization kinetics. Sensitivity of the modified {Delta} approach showed that the effect of simulated root/shoot ratios was limited to its effect on calculated {Delta}PCR values, and therefore had a minimal impact on calculated C budgets. For this approach to provide accurate estimates of C budgets, accurate estimates of {Delta}SOC final and {Delta}PCR are required. Because these values cannot be measured directly, they can be estimated using the Rayleigh fractionation equation. If 13C discrimination during SOC mineralization did not occur ({varepsilon} = 0), then in the <527.3- and >527.3-m elevation zones, 15.3 and 6.7%, respectively, of the SOCinitial were mineralized during the study. Sensitivity analysis showed that if {varepsilon} < 0 (13C discrimination during mineralization), then SOCinitial mineralization would have been less. The potential effects of 13C discrimination during mineralization on SOC budgets and related half-lives need to be investigated. Landscape differences were attributed to: (i) water stress, which influenced root and shoot growth characteristics; (ii) runoff that may have transported soil and crop residues from summit and shoulder areas to footslope areas; and (iii) tile-line repairs, which may have produced conditions that stimulated SOC mineralization.


   NOTES
TOP
 NOTES
ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
South Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Series no. 3450. Research supported in part by the United Soybean Board, South Dakota Soybean Research and Promotion Council, South Dakota Corn Utilization Board, NASA, USDA-CSREES, and South Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Agron. J.Home page
R. F. Follett, G. E. Varvel, J. M. Kimble, and K. P. Vogel
No-Till Corn after Bromegrass: Effect on Soil Carbon and Soil Aggregates
Agron. J., February 4, 2009; 101(2): 261 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Soil Sci.Home page
H. Chung, J. H. Grove, and J. Six
Indications for Soil Carbon Saturation in a Temperate Agroecosystem
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 18, 2008; 72(4): 1132 - 1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Agron. J.Home page
K.-I. Kim, D. E. Clay, C. G. Carlson, S. A. Clay, and T. Trooien
Do Synergistic Relationships between Nitrogen and Water Influence the Ability of Corn to Use Nitrogen Derived from Fertilizer and Soil?
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 551 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Soil Sci.Home page
D. E. Clay, C. E. Clapp, C. Reese, Z. Liu, C. G. Carlson, H. Woodard, and A. Bly
Carbon-13 Fractionation of Relic Soil Organic Carbon during Mineralization Effects Calculated Half-Lives
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 16, 2007; 71(3): 1003 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clay, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ellsbury, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clay, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ellsbury, M. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Clay, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ellsbury, M. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Isotopes
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Site-Specific Analysis
Right arrow Soil Conservation

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome