| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Fig. 7. Comparison between the two methods of the overall mean error across treatments for soybean in 2002, showing 95% confidence limits for each. Also shown is the probability that the differences between the two methods are due to variation, denoted P(T <= t), using the students t test at each point. The 27/171 treatment mean was used as the reference.
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
