Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barbarick, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barbarick, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barbarick, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Municipal Waste
Published in Agron. J. 95:1288-1294 (2003).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

BIOSOLIDS

Termination of Sewage Biosolids Application Affects Wheat Yield and Other Agronomic Characteristics

K. A. Barbarick* and J. A. Ippolito

Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170

* Corresponding author (Ken.Barbarick{at}ColoState.edu).

Received for publication September 19, 2002.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Biosolids land application for beneficial use requires managers to use agronomic rates to avoid nutrient overapplication. Consequently, one question regarding biosolids land application is, "Once application ceases, how long does it take agronomic properties associated with excessive biosolids applications to approach the agronomic characteristics corresponding to an untreated control?" In a summer fallow rotation system receiving 40 dry Mg biosolids ha-1 rate per cropping (six to nine times larger than the agronomic rate) for five applications (>10 yr), we compared dryland hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Vona’ or ‘TAM 107’) and 0- to 20-cm soil depth responses to results for an untreated, unfertilized control (0 Mg ha-1) for three croppings (>6 yr) following discontinuation. We applied biosolids from the Littleton/Englewood, CO, wastewater treatment plant to an Aridic Paleustoll and an Aridic Argiustoll soil at Sites A and B, respectively. Using a split plot in time design, we found differences, probably due to climatic variations, between the control and the discontinued biosolids treatment for yield and grain N, P, Zn, and Cu concentration at Site A and a significant cropping effect on all plant parameters at both sites. After five applications of biosolids exceeding the agronomic rate by six- to ninefold, the discontinued biosolids treatment produced similar soil NH4HCO3–diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (AB-DTPA) extractable P and Zn at both sites, and soil AB-DTPA Cu and electrical conductivity of a saturated soil–paste extract (ECe) at Site A by the third cropping following termination.

Abbreviations: AB-DTPA, NH4HCO3–diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid • DTPA, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid • ECe, electrical conductivity of saturated soil–paste extract • ICP-AES, inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectrophotometer • P, probability level


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
IF APPLIED at a rate that meets the N needs of a crop, biosolids can supply sufficient nutrients such as N, P, and Zn to dryland wheat in a summer fallow cropping system without posing environmental threats (Barbarick et al., 1992, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998; Barbarick and Ippolito, 2000). Previous research determined that 4.5 to 6.7 dry Mg ha-1 is the agronomic rate for continuous application of biosolids from the cities of Littleton and Englewood, CO, in a summer fallow cropping system (e.g., biosolids application every other year; Barbarick and Ippolito, 2000).

An unresolved question, however, is the time required for various plant and soil constituents on land that has received long-term excessive applications of biosolids to return to the levels found in an untreated, unfertilized control. We originally used biosolids rates that included excessive amounts to research the effects of overapplication (Barbarick et al., 1992). The USEPA 40 CFR 503 regulations (USEPA, 1993) do not permit biosolids application above the agronomic rate; however, we needed to overapply biosolids in a controlled research setting to determine the effects of the excessive biosolids additions on agronomic parameters. We needed information on long-term effects as well as carryover from large applications that are eventually terminated. We selected the untreated, unfertilized control data for comparison since agronomic rates of inorganic N fertilizer did not affect grain yields from 1990 through 1998 (data not shown). Barbarick and Ippolito (2000) have shown that N availability from biosolids application to soils in a greenhouse study provided little N carryover after two wheat crops following biosolids addition. Walter et al. (2002) found that soil samples taken at 1, 5, and 9 yr following completion of biosolids application at two long-term study sites in Spain showed increases at 1 yr following discontinuation in organic matter and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)–extractable Zn, Pb, Cd, Ni, Cr, and Cu concentrations then continuously declined in Years 5 and 9 at one site while declining in Year 5 and then increasing in Year 9 at the second site.

McBride et al. (1997) studied a field site 15 yr after a single, large biosolids application and found an estimated 40% of the applied Zn and Cu and 30% of the applied Cd and P were not recovered in a total analyses of the topsoil. They also showed that a large portion of the soluble Cu was in an organically complexed form. Barbarick et al. (1998) determined that only AB-DTPA–extractable (measure of plant availability) Zn consistently increased (ranged from 0.12 to 1.2 mg kg-1) in the subsoil of plots receiving alternate year applications (due to fallow rotation) at four dryland wheat locations over an 11-yr period. Most subsoil AB-DTPA–Zn concentrations were <1 mg kg-1, even after several years of biosolids application.

Dowdy et al. (1978) found that single applications of 0, 112, 225, and 450 Mg biosolids ha-1 caused Cu and Zn concentrations in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Tendergreen’) to increase with increasing biosolids rates. Plant concentrations did not change during 4 yr after the single biosolids application. Bidwell and Dowdy (1987) demonstrated that for 6 yr after the termination of biosolids application to corn (Zea mays L.) grown on a well-drained Waukegan soil (Typic Hapludoll; pH = 6.2), Cd and Zn uptake decreased significantly.

Our overall goal was to determine changes in wheat yields and selected agronomic properties following termination of 10 yr (5 alternate year applications in fallow rotation) of a biosolids application rate (40 dry Mg ha-1 per cropping) that was six to nine times larger than the agronomic rate (4.5–6.7 dry Mg ha-1 per cropping) compared with an untreated, unfertilized control (0 dry Mg ha-1). We investigated grain and surface soil concentrations of N, P, Zn, and Cu because all four elements are essential plant nutrients and because of environmental concern for N and P overapplication. We also determined changes in surface soil ECe, NO3–N, and organic C and total N. Our hypothesis was that within three harvests following termination of application of the 40 dry Mg biosolids ha-1 treatment, wheat yields; grain P, Zn, and Cu concentrations and uptake; soil AB-DTPA concentrations of P, Zn, and Cu; salinity (ECe); NO3–N; organic C; and total N would not differ significantly from the control when tested at the 0.10 probability level (P). We had observed some annual trends (unpublished data) that suggested statistically significant changes may be occurring after three croppings following discontinuation of biosolids application.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We initiated our long-term dryland wheat field study in August 1982 on a location near Bennett, CO, in Adams County (Barbarick et al., 1992). Mean annual precipitation for this area is 35 cm, mean annual temperatures ranged from 2 to 19°C, respectively, and the annual growing season is about 150 d (USDA-SCS, 1974). Two sets of plots (A for those established in 1982; B for those established in 1983) were used. Hard red winter wheat (‘Vona’ from 1982 to 1990, ‘TAM 107’ from 1990 to 1998) is typically seeded every 2 yr in a dryland summer fallow rotation system. Over a 2-yr period in this system, each site had 10 mo in wheat production and 14 mo in fallow. Alternate year biosolids application rates were 0, 6.7, 13, 27, and 40 dry Mg ha-1 (with four replications) from 1982 through 1991. Table 1 provides the biosolids concentrations applied to each site from 1982 through 1991. Elemental additions of biosolids-borne N, P, Zn, and Cu are given in Table 2. Beginning in 1992 at Site A and 1993 at Site B, we discontinued the 40 dry Mg ha-1 rate with the overall goal of determining how long agronomic parameters in these high-application plots would return to the control (e.g., received no biosolids or fertilizer application during the entire study) levels. We used the untreated, unfertilized control data for comparison since agronomic rates of inorganic N fertilizer did not affect grain yields from 1990 through 1998 (data not shown). The effects of inorganic N fertilizer rates were part of our overall research; however, we will not discuss the N fertilizer effects in this study. We also did not add any fertilizer to the 40 dry Mg ha-1 treatments once we terminated biosolids application.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Littleton/Englewood, CO, sewage biosolids used at the West Bennett sites from 1982 through 1991.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Elemental additions for the 40 Mg biosolids ha-1 treatment at West Bennett from 1982 to 1991.

 
We established West Bennett Site A (approximately 40 km northwest of Bennett, CO) on a Platner loam soil (fine, smectitic, mesic Aridic Paleustolls) and West Bennett Site B (about 5 km east of site A) on a Weld loam soil (fine, smectitic, mesic Aridic Argiustolls). The original organic matter content was 1% at both sites for 0 to 15 cm, 0.9 to 1.1% for 15 to 30 cm, and 0.8 to 1.0% for 30 to 60 cm; original surface soil pH ranged from 6.5 to 7.5 and subsoil pH ranged from 6.6 to 7.5; NO3–N was <7 mg kg-1 from 0 to 60 cm at both sites (Utschig et al., 1986). Selected properties for baseline soils are available in Utschig (1985). Barbarick et al. (1995) provide details on plot establishment and biosolids applications. This study represents only a portion of the research from a larger, continuous long-term experiment.

We determined grain yields by harvesting a 1.8 by 15.2 m area with a small-plot combine. We collected grain samples for elemental analyses each year, even in 1995–1996 when we experienced a crop failure at Site B. We determined N concentrations by dividing protein concentrations found with a Dickey John GAC III near infrared analyzer by 5.7. We measured grain elemental concentrations of P, Zn, and Cu in concentrated HNO3 digests (Ippolito and Barbarick, 2000) using an inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectrophotometer (ICP-AES; Soltanpour et al., 1996). We calculated N, P, Zn, and Cu uptake by multiplying grain yields by the grain elemental concentrations to estimate removal of these three elements via grain harvest.

Immediately following each wheat harvest, we collected composite soil samples (two to three cores per plot) from the 0- to 20-cm depth (tillage layer) near the center of each plot. Samples were taken near the center of each plot to avoid biosolids redistribution problems that can occur following many tillage operations during many cropping years (Yingming and Corey, 1993). The soil samples were immediately air-dried and crushed to pass a 2-mm sieve. Concentrations of soil P, Zn, and Cu were determined on an AB-DTPA extract utilizing ICP-AES. We used this extraction method since Barbarick and Workman (1987) found that AB-DTPA concentrations correlate well with the total amount of metal added to biosolids-amended soils, and Lindsay and Norvell (1978) also showed that soil-DTPA concentrations correlate to Zn and Cu plant availability. We measured the ECe to determine the soil salinity (Rhoades, 1996) and the NO3–N concentration on KCl soil extracts (Mulvaney, 1996). We measured total C and N in the 1993–1998 surface soil samples using a LECO-1000 CHN auto-analyzer (Nelson and Sommers, 1996). We did not measure total C and N before 1993, and our surface soils did not contain measurable quantities of inorganic C so that the total C amounts are essentially the organic C content of the soil.

We analyzed the data sets from each site using a split-plot analysis (Steel and Torrie, 1980, p. 377–382) where treatment (untreated, unfertilized control compared with discontinued biosolids application) were main plots and number of croppings following termination of biosolids application were the subplots (Barbarick and Ippolito, 2001). Our comparisons included 1990–1991 for Site A and 1991–1992 for Site B (last year biosolids were applied at each site or 0 croppings following termination of biosolids application), 1992–1993 and 1993–1994 (e.g., one cropping following discontinuation), 1994–1995 and 1995–1996 (e.g., two croppings following termination), and 1996–1997 and 1997–1998 (e.g., three croppings following discontinuation) at each site, respectively. We did not analyze all site and soil depth data together, since we had missing individual replication data for the following: grain concentrations other than N at Site A and AB-DTPA levels at Site B for no croppings following termination; AB-DTPA P concentrations at Site A after one cropping, and soil NO3–N at Site A and grain yield due to crop failure at Site B after two croppings. Because precipitation variations profoundly affect grain yields and subsequent grain concentrations and uptake in a dryland agroecosystem, we did not calculate the effects of the treatment by cropping interaction; and, therefore, we added the variation associated with this interaction to the error term in the split-plot analyses of variance. We did calculate the treatment x cropping interaction effect for all soil parameters. We determined Least Significant Difference values at P = 0.10 (LSD0.10) where we found significant effects for treatment (control vs. discontinued 40 Mg biosolids ha-1), croppings following termination (0, 1, 2, 3), or the interaction between treatments and number of croppings in our analyses of variance.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
For several agronomic parameters, our hypothesis was that the untreated, unfertilized control and the discontinued 40 dry Mg biosolids ha-1 treatment would not be significantly different after three croppings following termination of biosolids application. We tested this hypothesis by looking for significant "treatment (control vs. discontinued 40 Mg biosolids ha-1) x number of croppings" interactions when differences between the two treatments were statistically the same by the third cropping.

Our grain yields were generally less than the Adams County, Colorado average of about 2 Mg ha-1 due to the droughty conditions we experienced at our sites in the 1990s (Tables 3 and 4; Fig. 1) . We found a significant treatment effect on grain yield and grain N, P, Zn, and Cu concentrations at Site A and a significant cropping effect on all plant parameters at both sites. We cannot explain the treatment effect relative to the soil parameters we determined. The differences due to cropping probably resulted from precipitation differences during the 6 yr following termination of biosolids application. Despite the application of appreciable quantities of biosolids N, P, Zn, and Cu (Table 2), the discontinued 40 Mg biosolids ha-1 grain uptake (measure of element removal) of these elements was statistically the same as the untreated control at both sites. Corn Cd and Zn uptake declined for 6 yr after termination of biosolids application in Minnesota (Bidwell and Dowdy, 1987). By contrast Dowdy et al. (1978) found that snap bean Cu and Zn concentrations did not change over 4 yr after single applications of biosolids at different rates.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Wheat grain yield and grain concentrations and uptake for the untreated, unfertilized control (0 Mg biosolids ha-1) and discontinued 40 Mg biosolids ha-1 at the West Bennett Site A from 1990 through 1997.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Wheat grain yield and grain concentrations and uptake for the untreated, unfertilized control (0 Mg biosolids ha-1) and discontinued 40 Mg biosolids ha-1 at the West Bennett Site B from 1991 through 1998.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Wheat grain yields compared with the number of croppings after termination of five excessive biosolids applications at West Bennett, 1990–1998. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.

 
We focused on surface soil concentrations of AB-DTPA P, Zn, and Cu because of the agronomic and environmental concern of P, Zn, and Cu. We added at least 3500, 150, and 98 kg ha-1 of biosolids-borne P, Zn, and Cu, respectively, at Site A and higher amounts at Site B (Table 2). For Zn, this amounted to 5.5% at Site A and 6.8% at Site B of the cumulative limit allowed under USEPA 40 CFR 503 regulations (USEPA, 1993). For Cu, the biosolids additions were 6.5% at Site A and 7.4% of the cumulative limit allowed under USEPA 40 CFR 503 regulations (USEPA, 1993).

The most consistent trends occurred with AB-DTPA P, Zn, and Cu at both sites (Tables 5 and 6). For the discontinued 40 Mg biosolids ha-1 treatment, the AB-DTPA P and Zn concentrations at both sites and AB-DTPA Cu levels at Site A converged to essentially the same concentration as the control (Fig. 24) after three croppings following termination of biosolids applications. The decline in surface soil AB-DTPA P, Zn, and Cu could result from plant uptake, leaching into the subsoil, or formation of either slightly soluble soil minerals or adsorption onto soil minerals thus reducing their lability. Grain uptake removed <1% of the biosolids-applied P, Zn, and Cu (Tables 24). Barbarick et al. (1998) showed only minimal movement through the soil profile at this site with continuous alternate year biosolids additions of approximately 27 Mg dry biosolids ha-1 following five or six applications. Once new applications of biosolids ceased, the residual organic C was probably mineralized to a greater extent and then the released inorganic P, Zn, and Cu, in all likelihood formed slightly soluble minerals or were adsorbed by soil–mineral surfaces. Walter et al. (2002) did not find consistent trends for DTPA-extractable micronutrients or trace metals for up to 9 yr following termination of biosolids application on two sites in Spain.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. The AB-DTPA–extractable soil concentrations, electrical conductivity of saturated soil–paste extract (ECe), soil NO3–N, and organic C and N concentrations in the 0- to 20-cm soil depth for the untreated, unfertilized control (0 Mg biosolids ha-1) and discontinued 40 Mg biosolids ha-1 at the West Bennett Site A from 1990 through 1997.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. The AB-DTPA–extractable soil concentrations, electrical conductivity of saturated soil-paste extract (ECe), soil NO3–N, and organic C and N concentrations in the 0- to 20-cm soil depth for the untreated, unfertilized control (0 Mg biosolids ha-1) and discontinued 40 Mg biosolids ha-1 at the West Bennett Site B from 1991 through 1998.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The AB-DTPA soil-extractable P concentrations in the 0- to 20-cm depth compared with the number of croppings after termination of five excessive biosolids applications at West Bennett, 1990–1998. Where significant treatments x croppings interactions were found, averages labeled with the same lower case letter are not significantly different according to Least Significant Difference comparisons across all croppings at P <= 0.10.

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The AB-DTPA soil extractable Cu concentrations in the 0- to 20-cm depth compared with the number of croppings after termination of five excessive biosolids applications at West Bennett, 1990–1998. Where significant treatments x croppings interactions were found, averages labeled with the same lower case letter are not significantly different according to Least Significant Difference comparisons across all croppings at P <= 0.10.

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The AB-DTPA soil-extractable Zn concentrations in the 0- to 20-cm depth compared with the number of croppings after termination of five excessive biosolids applications at West Bennett, 1990–1998. Where significant treatments x croppings interactions were found, averages labeled with the same lower case letter are not significantly different according to Least Significant Difference comparisons across all croppings at P <= 0.10.

 
Surface soil NO3–N at Site A actually increased significantly by the third cropping (Table 5 and Fig. 5) while treatment x cropping interaction at Site B was not significant (Table 6 and Fig. 5). At Site A, the large application of organic N in the biosolids was continually mineralized during the three croppings following termination and neither plant uptake nor leaching prevented surface accumulation of NO3–N. We cannot explain why Site B did not follow this trend.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The soil NO3–N concentrations in the 0- to 20-cm depth compared with the number of croppings after termination of five excessive biosolids applications at West Bennett, 1990–1998. Where significant treatments x cropping interactions were found, averages labeled with the same lower case letter are not significantly different according to Least Significant Difference comparisons across all croppings at P <= 0.10.

 
Surface soil ECe for the biosolids treatment at Site A converged to that of the control by the second cropping but then increased significantly above the control for the third cropping (Table 5 and Fig. 6) . We did not find a significant treatment x croppings interaction at Site B. Even though we did not observe consistent trends, all soil ECe values except for no croppings at Site A were <2 dS m-1, indicating no salinity problems had developed at either site.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The ECe in the 0- to 20-cm depth compared with the number of croppings after termination of five excessive biosolids applications at West Bennett, 1990–1998. Where significant treatments x croppings interactions were found, averages labeled with the same lower case letter are not significantly different according to Least Significant Difference comparisons across all croppings at P <= 0.10.

 
For the surface organic C and total N, our data set was limited to the second and third croppings following termination at Site A and the first through third croppings at Site B (Tables 5 and 6). For organic C and total N, we did not find any significant treatments x croppings interactions.

Our hypothesis was that within three harvests following termination of application of the 40 dry Mg biosolids ha-1 treatment various agronomic parameters would not differ significantly from the control. In other words, we would observe a significant treatment x number of croppings interaction showing a convergence between parameter levels in the discontinued 40 dry Mg biosolids ha-1 to those in the untreated, unfertilized control. We found a significant biosolids-treatment effect on grain yield and grain N, P, Zn, and Cu concentrations at Site A and a significant cropping effect on all plant parameters at both sites. Because of climatic vagaries under dryland winter wheat growing conditions, we could not statistically determine the treatment x croppings interaction to judge if the plant parameters were the same after three croppings following termination of biosolids application. We would accept our hypothesis for surface AB-DTPA P and Zn at both sites and surface AB-DTPA Cu at Site A. We found inconsistent trends for soil ECe, NO3–N, organic C, and total N.

While excessive application is not allowed by the USEPA, sites that once were not regulated or where biosolids N availability was underestimated inadvertently may have received one or more biosolids rates that exceeded the agronomic rate. Our information should aid managers of biosolids programs in determining how long they may have to wait before dryland wheat areas receiving excessive biosolids will recover to untreated control levels. Remarkably, our results indicate that several agronomic characteristics could approach untreated control values within just three dryland winter wheat croppings following five applications of a biosolids rate that exceeded the recommended agronomic rate by six- to ninefold.


    NOTES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This project was supported by the Colorado Agric. Exp. Stn. (project no. 15-2924) and the cities of Littleton and Englewood, CO.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. L. Schroder, H. Zhang, D. Zhou, N. Basta, W. R. Raun, M. E. Payton, and A. Zazulak
The Effect of Long-Term Annual Application of Biosolids on Soil Properties, Phosphorus, and Metals
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 73 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
J. A. Ippolito, K. A. Barbarick, and K. L. Norvell
Biosolids Impact Soil Phosphorus Accountability, Fractionation, and Potential Environmental Risk
J. Environ. Qual., April 5, 2007; 36(3): 764 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
T. C. Granato, R. I. Pietz, G. J. Knafl, C. R. Carlson Jr., P. Tata, and C. Lue-Hing
Trace Element Concentrations in Soil, Corn Leaves, and Grain after Cessation of Biosolids Applications
J. Environ. Qual., November 1, 2004; 33(6): 2078 - 2089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barbarick, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barbarick, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barbarick, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Municipal Waste


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome