| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Dep. of Crop Sci., Univ. of Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
* Corresponding author (gbollero{at}uiuc.edu)
Received for publication May 21, 2002.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Abbreviations: DCD, decomposition-day(s) • DGD, degree-day(s) • ESS, error sum of squares • WCC, winter cover crop
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The detrimental or beneficial effects that managing residues have on soils and crops depend primarily on the quantity and quality of the starting residue (i.e., at kill date in the case of WCC) and its subsequent decomposition. For example, yield can be decreased by an excessive biomass cover that reduces crop stands due to poor soil–seed contact and germination. On the other hand, little residue may not be adequate for soil and water conservation goals. The appropriate amount of residue required varies depending on the role that residues play in the cropping system. To effectively manage WCC, it is critical to understand the factors that control residue decomposition and to be able to model it.
Nitrogen release from WCC residues is the first process in a series that transform residue organic N into soil mineral N. Carbon and N are the two elements controlling soil biological activity, and they strongly interact in both the short and long term. In the short term, available C can increase denitrification and immobilization of N (McKenney et al., 1993) while in the long term, residue C and N stabilize together (McGill and Cole, 1981) and changes in soil organic N are closely associated with changes in soil organic C (Kuo and Jellum, 2000). Consequently, it is relevant to study C and N releases at the same time.
The rate of decomposition and C and N release include the effects of the environment (i.e., air temperature, precipitation, and soil characteristics) and the biochemical composition of the residue (Quemada and Cabrera, 1995; Heal et al., 1997; Wagger et al., 1998). Any attempt to analyze and predict residue decomposition rates should consider these two factors and separate their exclusive effects. This paper investigates the effect of the environmental factors on residue decomposition and on C and N release.
Several methodologies have been developed to account for the effect of air temperature and precipitation on residue decomposition and C and N release. Honeycutt and Potaro (1990) used DGD to predict C and N residue mineralization while Stroo et al. (1989) proposed the calculation of DCD based on the minimum of a temperature factor and a moisture factor. The advantage of using these approaches is that they allow the comparison between field and lab experiments and among different locations and years. In addition, because cumulative DGD are commonly used to predict crop development, it is a practical methodology to match soil and crop processes and analyze the synchrony between residue N release and crop N uptake. A more detailed approach to model residue decomposition was taken by Andrén and Paustian (1987). These authors included the effect of soil temperature and soil water potential on buried residue using a variety of nonlinear models. Rodrigo et al. (1997) also described the effects of temperature and soil water potential on C and N transformation comparing nine simulation models. However, the simpler approach of using DCD for surface residue decomposition models is used in the submodels of the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) and the revised wind erosion equation (RWEQ) (Schomberg et al., 1996; Schomberg and Steiner, 1997).
Most decomposition experiments reported in the literature have been performed under either controlled laboratory conditions (Honeycutt et al., 1993; Gilmour et al., 1998) or using the mesh bag technique under field conditions (Schomberg et al., 1994; Ranells and Wagger, 1996). These methodologies reduce the sources of error and require less intensive labor than field experiments using grab sampling (Steiner et al., 1999; Ma et al., 1999). However, the extrapolation from laboratory conditions to field environment may produce misleading conclusions. Mesh bags exclude soil fauna, modify residue microclimate, and put residues in contact with soil when in natural conditions, residues would be standing on or above the soil surface for a longer period. Steiner et al. (1999) suggest that there is a need for research conducted under more realistic field conditions to produce reliable management recommendations.
The objectives of this study were to (i) estimate the equation parameters of biomass, C, and N decomposition of WCC residues expressed as a function of cumulative DGD and DCD; (ii) analyze the effects of WCCs and location on decomposition; and (iii) compare the DCD and DGD methodologies.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The experiment was conducted using no-till practices in land that had been in a corn–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation for at least 5 yr. In the second year, the experiment was conducted in a field adjacent to the field used the previous year. The experimental design was a split-plot arrangement of treatments in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Main-plot treatments were WCC (rye, hairy vetch, and rye–hairy vetch in biculture) and fallow. Main plots were 9 m wide by 20 m long. Split-plot treatments were four levels of N fertilizer: 0, 90, 180, and 270 kg N ha-1 applied as ammonium nitrate at corn V6 stage. Split plots were 4.5 m wide by 10 m long and accommodated six rows of corn planted 76 cm wide.
Winter cover crops were drilled on soybean stubble on 3 Oct. 1998 and 2 Oct. 1999 at Brownstown and on 1 Oct. 1998 and 5 Oct. 1999 at Urbana. Seeding rates were 134 and 34 kg ha-1 for rye and hairy vetch, respectively. In the biculture, the seeding rate was 67 and 23 kg ha-1 for rye and hairy vetch, respectively. Hairy vetch was inoculated each year with Rhizobium leguminosarum var. viciae (Urbana Labs, St. Joseph, MO). Winter cover crops were killed with a mixture of 1.1 kg a.i. ha-1 glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] and 0.4 kg a.i. ha-1 of 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) on 28 Apr. 1999 and 29 Apr. 2000 at Brownstown and 2 May 1999 and 4 May 2000 at Urbana.
Grab samples were collected from the control plots (0 kg N ha-1) at six times during corn growing season to monitor residue decomposition. The first sampling time was done right before killing the WCC, and subsequent samples were taken approximately every 3 wk during the growing season until 1 wk before corn harvest. Grab samples were taken using a frame and consisted of three subsamples (0.12 m2 each) on the first three sampling dates and two on the last three sampling dates. The area comprised of the three central corn rows was selected for sampling. Standing residues were cut at ground level with electric shears, and the plant material was gathered by hand. Rye and hairy vetch residue components of the biculture were separated in the laboratory. Residue samples were dried for 3 d at 65°C, weighed, and ground to pass through a 1-mm mesh. Residue samples were analyzed for total C and N with an automated Dumas instrument (LECO CHN-2000, LECO Corp., St. Joseph, MI). The residue weight was calculated on an ash-free weight basis by determining the ash content on a 1-g subsample (550°C).
Degree-days were calculated as the average of daily maximum and minimum temperature, assuming 0°C as the base temperature for residue decomposition (Honeycutt and Potaro, 1990). Degree-days were accumulated daily during the sampling season.
The model first developed by Stroo et al. (1989) and later used by Steiner et al. (1999) and Ma et al. (1999) was used for the calculation of DCD. This model considers two factors: moisture and temperature. Each factor is included in the DCD using a coefficient that ranges from 0 to 1. A value of 1 indicates optimum conditions for decomposition, and 0 indicates no decomposition. It is assumed that the most limiting factor controls decomposition. The DCD for a given day is equal to the minimum of the moisture coefficient or the temperature coefficient.
The moisture coefficient is set to 1 if the precipitation for that day is 
4 mm. It is assumed that 4 mm of rain is enough to fully wet a dense layer of residues (Steiner et al., 1999). If precipitation is <4 mm, then the moisture coefficient is set to be equal to the precipitation divided by 4 plus half of the moisture coefficient of the previous day. In the absence of precipitation, the moisture coefficient decreases by a factor of 0.5 each day after the last precipitation.
The temperature coefficient (TC) is calculated based on Steiner et al. (1999) as follows:
 | [1] |
Biomass decomposition and C and N release were analyzed by fitting a first-order exponential single-pool decay model:
 | [2] |
Model parameters were estimated for each cover crop at each location and year using the NLIN procedure of SAS (SAS Inst., 2000). Residuals were analyzed visually for abnormal patterns and tested for autocorrelation using the Durbin–Watson test. The normality of residuals was assessed with the UNIVARIATE procedure of SAS (SAS Inst., 2000). Model parameters were considered significant if the 95% confidence interval did not encompass zero.
Model parameters obtained for biomass decomposition and C and N release were statistically analyzed with the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Inst., 2000). The parameters obtained with time expressed as DCD and DGD were analyzed separately. Location and WCC were considered fixed factors, and year was considered a random factor.
To determine if nonlinear regressions models using DGD and DCD as time differed in error sum of squares (ESS), an F-test ratio between the ESS of DCD and DGD models was performed as proposed by Thuries et al. (2001). The ratio was calculated between ESS for each WCC, location, year, and variable (biomass, C, or N) combination using an 
= 0.05 to reject the null hypothesis that ESS were equal.
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
The accumulation of DGD was relatively constant and smoother than the accumulation of DCD regardless of site-year (Fig. 1). Cumulative DCD showed periods of rapid accumulation and periods of no accumulation, which coincided with dry periods when moisture was the limiting factor for residue decomposition. Ma et al. (1999) compared different decomposition models and concluded that under rainfed conditions, the moisture coefficient was the limiting factor for DCD accumulation. It is expected that during summer, moisture controls the accumulation of DCD. Decomposition-days reflected larger differences between years than DGD, which is in agreement with the greater differences in precipitation than in temperature between years. In summary, the contrasting dynamics of DCD and DGD accumulation methods affect the relative position in time (expressed as DCD or DGD) of a given calendar date. Because the rate of accumulation of DGD only depends on air temperature, the accumulated DGD between any two dates is, for all practical purposes, a straight line (Fig. 1). On the contrary, DCD accumulation is a function of precipitation. For example, in a dry period, it is possible that DCD accumulation will not change in many days, but in a wet period (after precipitation), DCD increases rapidly within the same number of days (Fig. 1).
Decomposition Models
Winter cover crop biomass, C, and N concentrations at the time of killing are presented in Table 2. At both locations and years, rye biomass production was similar to values commonly reported in the literature (Clark et al., 1994; Ranells and Wagger, 1996). However, rye N concentration was higher compared with Wagger (1989) and Ranells and Wagger (1996). In contrast, hairy vetch produced less biomass and had lower N content than that reported in areas with higher average temperatures during the winter months (Reeves, 19944). Lower temperatures reduce biomass production of hairy vetch in the upper Midwest (Bollero and Bullock, 1994).
|
|
|
According to the F test, there was no significant difference in ESS between DCD and DGD (not shown). Both methods performed similarly as estimators of weather effects on WCC residue decomposition. This result is surprising, considering that the calculation of DCD includes the effect of moisture on decomposition combined with an optimum value of temperature while DGD does not consider moisture and assumes a linear increase of decomposition rate with temperature. It is likely that the effect of precipitation was not large enough to obtain significant differences between DCD and DGD and that the ranges of temperatures explored in this study were not large enough to generate differences between the DCD and DGD models on the decomposition and release rates.
When four site-years are considered, relative biomass decomposition rates (k) of rye and rye in biculture ranged from 0.27 x 10-3 to 0.59 x 10-3 DGD-1. The biomass decomposition rate for hairy vetch and hairy vetch in biculture ranged from 0.23 x 10-3 to 3.7 x 10-3 DGD-1. These values for C release rates were similar to the ones reported by other authors. For example, Ma et al. (1999) reported a range of k for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop residue between 0.3 x 10-3 and 0.45 x 10-3 DGD-1 for three locations in eastern Colorado. Kaboneka et al. (1997) incubated soybean, corn, and wheat residues at 24°C for 30 d. They found k values that ranged between 0.013 and 0.03 d-1 for a slow-decomposing C fraction, which are equal to 0.54 x 10-3 and 1.25 x 10-3 DGD-1.
Honeycutt (1999) reported N mineralization rates of buried hairy vetch residues of 12.3 x 10-3 and 7.9 x 10-3 DGD-1. Varco et al. (1993) compared hairy vetch decomposition under no-till and conventional till and found that surface residues decomposed four times faster when mixed in the top 20 cm of soil than on the surface. Similarly, Douglas and Rickman (1992) used a factor to correct for residue placement and used 0.8 for buried and 0.2 for surface residue. If corrected by the fourfold difference between buried and surface-placed residues, the mineralization rates reported by Honeycutt (1999) are 3.1 x 10-3 and 1.9 x 10-3 DGD-1. In agreement, the decomposition rates (k) for hairy vetch in Brownstown 2000 and for hairy vetch in biculture at Urbana 1999 and 200 were within that range.
Relative decomposition rates (k) for biomass of rye, rye in biculture, hairy vetch, and hairy vetch in biculture ranged from 0.018 to 0.244 DCD-1 (Tables 3 and 4). In an experiment involving residue decomposition of oat (Avena sativa L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), spring wheat, and winter wheat, Steiner et al. (1999) reported k values ranging from 0.015 to 0.042 DCD-1. Relative decomposition rate values of rye and rye in biculture obtained in this study were within the same range. There are no reports in the literature of relative decomposition rates for legume WCC with time expressed as DCD. However, as expected, relative decomposition rates for hairy vetch and hairy vetch in biculture were higher than those for cereal WCC. It is broadly accepted that legume residues decompose faster than cereal residues.
Initial biomass and initial C and N content (Yo) of WCC reflect the differences in dry matter accumulation between rye and hairy vetch as well as the larger N concentration of hairy vetch. With the four site-years, the range of initial biomass was from 2400 to 5000 kg ha-1 for rye and from 330 to 1940 kg ha-1 for hairy vetch.
The estimates of k and Yo for biomass, C, and N decomposition models were used to analyze the effect of location and WCC on these parameters. For DCD and DGD, WCC had a significant effect on biomass, C, and N relative decomposition rates (Table 5). The significant effect of cover crops on relative decomposition rate was also reported by Wagger (1989) and Ranells and Wagger (1996). These authors used a single-pool decomposition model, and they found that hairy vetch had a larger relative decomposition rate than rye.
|
The variance components of the random effects in the model (i.e., years and location and WCC interactions with years) were smaller than the residual. Clearly, these results indicate that year and its interactions with location and WCC were not a significant source of variability for relative decomposition rate, in turn suggesting that DGD and DCD were able to account for year-to-year variability.
Winter cover crop had a significant effect on initial (Yo) biomass and C content, for both DCD and DGD (Table 6). There was no WCC effect on initial (Yo) N content. In addition, the WCC x location interaction was not significant for initial biomass, C, and N content. For initial N content, the variance component of the random effect of year x WCC was more than four times larger than the residual. This suggests that there is an important variability on N concentration between years due to the large effect of soil residual N and weather on crop growth and N uptake. In addition, for initial C and biomass, the random effects presented similar or lower variances than the residual.
|
At corn V6 stage (17 DCD or 1000 DGD), rye and rye in biculture had released approximately 33% of its initial N content while hairy vetch had released nearly 75% of its initial N and hairy vetch in biculture released 100% of its initial N (Fig. 2 and 3). Similar results were obtained for C at corn V6 stage (Fig. 2 and 3). At the end of the growing season (60 DCD or 3500 DGD), C and N from rye in both monoculture and biculture were not completely released (Fig. 2 and 3).
|
|
Rye and the rye component of the biculture offer a potential value as soil and water conservation tools due to their relatively low decomposition rate. Figures 2 and 3 show that at corn stage V6, rye and rye in biculture contained approximately 80 kg C ha-1, which provided good soil cover. In contrast, hairy vetch and hairy vetch in biculture had very low biomass and C content remaining at corn stageV6 and thus a reduced effectiveness as soil covers. In addition, rye and rye in biculture increase soil organic matter and total soil N in the long term, as reported by Kuo and Jellum (2000).
In conclusion, rye in monoculture or biculture presented lower N concentration but larger biomass than hairy vetch, resulting in similar N content at killing time. Hairy vetch, when grown in biculture, did not affect rye composition and did not increase rye decomposition or C and N release rates. We were able to model residue biomass decomposition and C and N release of WCC with data obtained from field experiments by grab sampling and time expressed as DCD and DGD. There was no difference in using either DCD or DGD to account for the effect of temperature and moisture on biomass decomposition and C and N release. The decomposition dynamic of hairy vetch makes it a potential source of N for corn. However, its low N content at killing might reduce its capacity to provide enough N to replace N fertilizer. In contrast, rye presented a slow decomposition, which does not contribute N to corn and might even immobilize soil N. However, rye is an excellent tool for conservation tillage systems. More research of the optimum killing times of hairy vetch and rye under midwestern conditions is needed to improve WCC management and profitability. We believe that, although labor intensive, grab sampling in field experiments provides good estimates of decomposition rates. The next step necessary to understand and model decomposition is to analyze the effect of residue quality on k and to be able to predict it.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Zotarelli, L. Avila, J. M. S. Scholberg, and B. J. R. Alves Benefits of Vetch and Rye Cover Crops to Sweet Corn under No-Tillage Agron. J., February 4, 2009; 101(2): 252 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Cavigelli, J. R. Teasdale, and A. E. Conklin Long-Term Agronomic Performance of Organic and Conventional Field Crops in the Mid-Atlantic Region Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 785 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. B. Villamil, G. A. Bollero, R. G. Darmody, F. W. Simmons, and D. G. Bullock No-Till Corn/Soybean Systems Including Winter Cover Crops: Effects on Soil Properties Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 20, 2006; 70(6): 1936 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. C. Kaspar, T. B. Parkin, D. B. Jaynes, C. A. Cambardella, D. W. Meek, and Y. S. Jung Examining Changes in Soil Organic Carbon with Oat and Rye Cover Crops Using Terrain Covariates Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 23, 2006; 70(4): 1168 - 1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. E. Miguez and G. A. Bollero Winter Cover Crops in Illinois: Evaluation of Ecophysiological Characteristics of Corn Crop Sci., May 18, 2006; 46(4): 1536 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Ruffo, D. G. Bullock, and G. A. Bollero Soybean Yield as Affected by Biomass and Nitrogen Uptake of Cereal Rye in Winter Cover Crop Rotations Agron. J., May 1, 2004; 96(3): 800 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||
indicates corn V6 stage.