Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malinowski, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Malinowski, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Malinowski, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Agronomy Journal 95:614-626 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy

FORAGES

Productivity and Survival of Defoliated Wheatgrasses in the Rolling Plains of Texas

D. P. Malinowski*,a, A. A. Hopkinsb, W. E. Pinchaka, J. W. Sija and R. J. Ansleya

a Texas A&M Univ., Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., P.O. Box 1658, Vernon, TX 76385
b The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, P.O. Box 2180, Ardmore, OK 73402

* Corresponding author (d-malinowski{at}tamu.edu)

Received for publication February 21, 2002.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
In the Texas Rolling Plains, cool-season perennial grasses may complement limited forage availability in March–May and October–December. In two experiments conducted at Vernon, TX, on a sandy loam soil (fine-loamy, mixed, thermic Udic Paleustalfs), we evaluated productivity and persistence of crested [Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. x A. desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) J.A. Schultes], hybrid [Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski x Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) L‘ve], intermediate [Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey], pubescent [T. intermedium ssp. barbulatum (Schur) Barkw. & D.R. Dewey], and tall wheatgrass [T. ponticum (Podp.) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey] under combinations of 3- or 6-wk defoliation frequency at 7.5- or 15-cm. About 64% more herbage yield was harvested from all species at the 7.5- vs. 15-cm defoliation height in the first, but only from crested, hybrid, and pubescent wheatgrass in the second growing season. Frequent defoliation increased herbage by 22% in Experiment A or 37% in Experiment B only in the first growing season. Tiller survival increased with frequent defoliation in intermediate wheatgrass by 33% in Experiment A and up to 70% in Experiment B, but decreased by 52% in hybrid and by 33% in pubescent wheatgrass in Experiment A, and up to 50% in Experiment B. Lower nighttime soil temperatures increased tiller survival during summer in swards defoliated at the 7.5- vs. 15-cm height. Wheatgrass productivity increased under intensive or frequent defoliation in the first, but declined in several species in the subsequent growing season, making their potential to complement forage base limited.

Abbreviations: a.i., active ingredient • DM, dry matter • LAI, leaf area index


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
SEMIARID REGIONS of the Texas Rolling Plains are characterized by relatively mild winters and hot, dry summers often with prolonged drought (Kephart et al., 1995). In these environments, C4 grasses are the dominant component of rangelands and improved pastures grazed by livestock during summer and fall (Weakley et al., 2000). High quality winter forage is based mostly on dual-purpose wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) pastures (Pinchak et al., 1996). The gaps in forage availability from early March (termination of grazing on dual-purpose wheat) until May (grazing on warm-season grass pastures) and from October until December (low quality forage from dormant warm-season grass pastures) may be filled by improved cool-season perennial grasses (Reuter et al., 1999). Their forage quality is generally better than that of dormant warm-season grasses (Kloppenburg et al., 1995). Therefore, perennial cool-season grasses may be considered as potential source of added value in beef production systems. Winter weather conditions are favorable for growth of most cool-season perennial grasses in the Texas Rolling Plains. Soil water deficits and high temperatures during summer months, however, reduce survival and significantly limit the number of potentially adapted species (Redmon, 1997).

Perennial cool-season grasses growing in semiarid environments with prolonged summer drought often have the ability to survive and recover rapidly once water becomes available in the fall (Kemp and Culvenor, 1990). Wheatgrasses native to the Great Plains meet this criterion, but are usually less grazing tolerant and have lower nutritional quality than wheatgrasses introduced from Europe and Asia (Asay, 1995). Responses of these C3 grasses to defoliation intensity and frequency are not well understood at the margin of their survival range in C4–dominated environments (Redmon, 1997). Our objectives were to determine productivity and persistence of several introduced wheatgrass species under a range of defoliation frequency and intensity combinations, and the relationship between defoliation regimes and soil temperature during summer drought on wheatgrass persistence.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Experiment A
Wheatgrass species were represented by CD II crested wheatgrass [Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. x A. desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) J. A. Schultes], NewHy hybrid wheatgrass [Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski x Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) Löve], Oahe intermediate wheatgrass [Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth & D. R. Devey], Manska pubescent wheatgrass [T. intermedium ssp. barbulatum (Shur) Barkworth & D. R. Devey], and Jose tall wheatgrass [T. ponticum (Podp.) Barkworth & D. R. Devey]. Plots were planted in September 1998 near Vernon, TX, on a Miles fine sandy loam (fine-loamy, mixed, Thermic Udic Paleustalfs). Initial soil pH was 6.6, with adequate concentrations of P (20 mg kg-1) and K (300 mg kg-1). Before planting, plots were fertilized by deep placement of 45 kg N ha-1 as liquid NH4NO3 and microelements. Seeds were planted with a Tye Pasture Pleasure & Stubble Drill (AgEquipment Group LP, Lockney, TX) at row spacing of 0.18 m in tilled soil at the seeding rate of 19 kg pure live seeds ha-1. In March and May 1999 and 2000, all plots were broadcast fertilized with 45 kg N ha-1 as (NH4)2SO4. Broad-leaf weeds were controlled with metsulfuron {methyl 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-amino]carbonyl]-amino]-sulfonyl]benzoate} at the rate of 2.02 g a.i. ha-1 in May 1999.

The experimental design was split-plot randomized block with four replicates. Whole plots were wheatgrass species were planted in strips with combinations of defoliation frequency and intensity imposed as subplots. A total of 112 subplots, 2 by 13 m in size, were defoliated between 17 April and 12 July 1999 (first growing season) and 27 April and 8 June 2000 (second growing season) by clipping at a height of 7.5 or 15 cm and at a 3- or 6-wk interval. The first harvest in each season was made when inflorescences emerged. Subplots were mowed with exception of an area of 0.25 m2, which was manually clipped to determine dry matter (DM) of herbage yield. A section of each whole plot (2 by 3 m) was excluded from defoliation, and a part of this section (0.36 by 1 m) was then clipped, at ground level, only at the end of the growing season to determine aboveground biomass of undefoliated plants. In each year, biomass of undefoliated plants was harvested from a different section of the subplot to minimize carryover effects.

Herbage DM yield was defined as plant material harvested above the defoliation height. At the end of each growing season, a 0.25-m2 section of each defoliated subplot was harvested to ground level for stubble determination. In each year, stubble was collected from a different section of a subplot to minimize carryover effects. Aboveground biomass was the sum of cumulative herbage DM yield and stubble DM below the defoliation height or, for undefoliated swards, herbage harvested at ground level at the end of the growing season. The number of live tillers (at least one green leaf present) was recorded before the onset of summer drought (July 1999 and July 2000) and after summer drought (September 1999 and December 2000) by counting tillers from a 0.6-m section of one row in the middle of each subplot. The percentage of leaf DM in herbage DM yield and stubble DM was determined to evaluate the effects of defoliation treatments on sward composition. Soil temperatures in crested and tall wheatgrass plots were monitored by 2-channel HOBO loggers (Onset Computer Corp., Bourne, MA) at a 5-cm depth between May and September in each growing season. The average daytime soil temperature was determined for the period between 0700 and 1900 h, and the average nighttime soil temperature for the period between 1900 and 0700 h.

Experiment B
Plots (72 in total; 2 by 11 m each) were established in September 1999 at a location adjacent to Exp. A. Defoliation treatments consisted of two defoliation intervals of 3 or 6 wk and at one height of 7.5 cm. This defoliation height was chosen because it increased tiller survival in Exp. A. Hybrid wheatgrass was omitted from the study, but all other species were the same as in Exp. A. The number of live tillers was recorded before the onset of summer drought in July 2000 (first growing season) and July 2001(second growing season) and after summer drought (November 2000 and October 2001). Soil temperature was not monitored in Exp. B.

Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of the Statistical Analysis System (Littell et al., 1996). For each experiment, replications were considered random, whereas growing season, wheatgrass species, defoliation intensity (Exp. A), and frequency (Exp. A and B) were considered fixed factors. Percentage values of leaf DM in herbage yield and stubble were transformed by arcsin function before statistical analysis to ensure normal distribution. Mean separation was performed using the protected least square means (LSMEANS) procedure. Significance was declared at P < 0.05.

Soil temperature data (daily means) were analyzed using the MIXED procedure with measurements repeated in time for the period May to September in each growing season. Replications were considered random, while growing season, wheatgrass species, defoliation frequency, and intensity were considered fixed. Mean separation was performed using the LSMEANS procedure at P = 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Unusually severe drought occurred each summer. Average yearly precipitation for the experimental site is 653 mm with peaks in May and September, and average monthly temperatures reaching 26.6 to 28.4°C from June to August. Summer drought of 1999 was characterized by temperatures exceeding the long-term average for July (+0.5°C) and August (+2.6°C), and a severe precipitation deficit (-106.7 mm or 52%) from July until September, with some occasional rainfall events (Fig. 1A and 1B) . Unusual drought conditions continued during winter and early spring of 2000 as shown by higher than normal average monthly temperatures and precipitation deficits. Drought in 2000 was more severe than in 1999 because of trace amount of precipitation from July until October (deficit of 189 mm or 93%) and above normal temperatures in July (+0.6°C) and August (+2.9°C). From October 2000 until May 2001, precipitation was slightly above normal and average monthly temperatures were lower than the long-term average. During July–September 2001 precipitation deficit was 157 mm (88%) and average monthly temperatures were higher than the long-term average in July (+2.2°C) and August (+0.9°C).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Average monthly temperature and precipitation for Vernon, TX, during 1999–2001.

 
Cumulative Herbage Yield, Stubble, and Aboveground Biomass
Cumulative herbage yield was determined by an interaction of defoliation frequency with growing season in each experiment (Tables 1 and 2). In the first growing season, a greater cumulative herbage yield was produced at the 3- vs. 6-wk defoliation frequency (Fig. 2A and 2B) . In the second growing season, the effect of defoliation frequency on herbage yield was not significant. Cumulative herbage yield was greater in the second, when compared with the first growing season, only at the 6-wk defoliation interval in Exp. A (Fig. 2A). In contrast, less herbage yield was produced in the second than the first growing season in Exp. B, regardless of defoliation frequency (Fig. 2B).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Combined analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) for Exp. A: Probabilities for the main effects and interactions of growing season (S), wheatgrass species (W), defoliation frequency (F), and defoliation height (H) on cumulative herbage yield, stubble DM, aboveground biomass, proportion of leaf DM in herbage yield and stubble, and tiller number before and after summer drought.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Combined analysis of variance (PROC MIXED) for Exp. B: Probabilities for the main effects and interactions of growing season (S), wheatgrass species (W), and defoliation frequency (F) on cumulative herbage yield, stubble, aboveground biomass, proportion of leaf DM in herbage yield and stubble, and tiller number before and after summer drought.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cumulative herbage yield in response to defoliation frequency in the first and second growing season in (A) Exp. A and (B) Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 
Cumulative herbage yield was also related to an interaction of defoliation height, wheatgrass species, and growing season in Exp. A (Table 1), and an interaction of wheatgrass species with growing season in Exp. B (Table 2). In the first growing season of Exp. A, all wheatgrass species produced greater cumulative herbage yield at the 7.5- vs. 15-cm defoliation height (Table 3). Tall and intermediate wheatgrass were more productive than other species when defoliated at the 7.5-cm height. At the 15-cm clipping height, intermediate wheatgrass was more productive than tall wheatgrass and the least productive were crested and hybrid wheatgrass. In the second growing season, crested, hybrid, and pubescent wheatgrass had greater cumulative herbage yield at the 7.5- vs. 15-cm defoliation height, whereas intermediate and tall wheatgrass did not respond to defoliation intensity. At the 7.5-cm clipping height, intermediate, pubescent, and crested wheatgrass produced more cumulative herbage yield than tall wheatgrass. With less intensive defoliation, the greatest cumulative herbage yield was produced by intermediate and pubescent wheatgrass, followed by tall and crested wheatgrass, and least by hybrid wheatgrass. Productivity of crested and pubescent wheatgrass defoliated at the 7.5-cm height was greater in the second when compared with the first growing season, while tall wheatgrass productivity declined by 50% in the second growing season. At the 15-cm defoliation height, cumulative herbage yield increased in the second when compared with the first growing season in crested, hybrid, and pubescent wheatgrass, whereas productivity of intermediate and tall wheatgrass was similar in both growing seasons.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Interaction of growing season, wheatgrass species, and defoliation intensity on cumulative herbage yield in Exp. A.

 
In Exp. B, all species were less productive in the second than the first growing season, regardless of defoliation frequency (Fig. 3) . Intermediate and tall wheatgrass had a greater cumulative herbage yield than pubescent wheatgrass, while crested wheatgrass did not differ significantly from any other species in the first growing season. In the second growing season, pubescent and intermediate wheatgrass produced more cumulative herbage yield than tall and crested wheatgrass.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cumulative herbage yield of wheatgrass species in the first and second growing season in Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 
The effects of wheatgrass species, defoliation frequency, and intensity on stubble DM in Exp. A varied with growing seasons as indicated by significant interactions (Table 1). Defoliation frequency did not affect stubble DM in the first growing season; however, less stubble DM was produced at the 3- vs. 6-wk clipping interval in the second growing season (Fig. 4A) . Stubble DM increased in response to less intensive defoliation, regardless of growing season (Fig. 4B). A decline in stubble DM occurred with time in swards defoliated at the 15-cm height, whereas swards defoliated at the 7.5-cm height produced a similar stubble DM in both growing seasons. Pubescent and tall wheatgrass had less stubble DM in the second vs. first growing season, regardless of defoliation regimes (Table 4). Wheatgrass species produced similar stubble DM in the first growing season, except for crested wheatgrass. In the second growing season, hybrid, intermediate, and pubescent wheatgrass produced more stubble DM than crested and tall wheatgrass.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Stubble DM as a function of defoliation (A) frequency and (B) intensity in the first and second growing season in Exp. A. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Interaction of growing season and wheatgrass species on stubble DM and aboveground biomass in Exp. A.

 
In Exp. B, stubble DM was determined by main effects of growing season and wheatgrass species. More stubble DM was produced in the first vs. second growing season (866 and 283 kg ha-1, respectively). Among wheatgrass species, pubescent wheatgrass had more stubble DM (721 kg ha-1) than crested (517 kg ha-1) and tall wheatgrass (471 kg ha-1), while intermediate wheatgrass did not differ significantly from any other species (588 kg ha-1).

Aboveground biomass was the result of an interaction of defoliation frequency and growing season in each experiment (Tables 1 and 2). More aboveground biomass was produced at 3 vs. 6-wk defoliation interval in the first growing season (Fig. 5A and 5B) . In the second growing season, aboveground biomass declined in response to frequent defoliation in Exp. A (Fig. 5A), but was not affected by defoliation frequency in Exp. B (Fig. 5B).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Aboveground biomass in response to defoliation frequency in the first and second growing season in (A) Exp. A and (B) Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 
In Exp. A, growing seasons interacted with wheatgrass species in determining aboveground biomass (Table 1). Aboveground biomass of wheatgrasses was similar in both growing seasons except for tall wheatgrass (Table 4). Intermediate, pubescent, and tall wheatgrass had more aboveground biomass than crested and hybrid wheatgrass in the first growing season. Similar responses occurred in the second growing season, except for tall wheatgrass, which produced the least aboveground biomass. In Exp. B, aboveground biomass was determined by the main effect of wheatgrass species (Table 2). Intermediate and pubescent wheatgrass produced more aboveground biomass (3311 and 3186 kg ha-1, respectively) than tall and crested wheatgrass (2889 and 2655 kg ha-1, respectively), regardless of growing season.

All defoliation treatments reduced aboveground biomass when compared with undefoliated plants in Exp. A, regardless of growing season (Fig. 5A, data for defoliation intensity not shown). In contrast, aboveground biomass of wheatgrasses defoliated every 3 wk was not different from undefoliated plants in Exp. B in the first growing season (Fig. 5B). In the second growing season, however, defoliated plants produced less aboveground biomass than undefoliated plants.

Herbage Yield and Stubble Composition
The proportion of leaf DM in herbage yield was modified by a three-way interaction among wheatgrass species, defoliation frequency, and intensity in Exp. A (Table 1). The 3- vs. 6-wk defoliation interval increased the proportion of leaf DM in herbage in crested and intermediate wheatgrass clipped at the 7.5-cm height and in tall wheatgrass defoliated at the 15-cm height (Table 5). Under more intensive defoliation, crested, hybrid, and intermediate wheatgrass had more leaf DM in herbage than pubescent and tall wheatgrass when defoliated every 3 wk. When defoliated every 6 wk, hybrid wheatgrass had a greater proportion of leaf DM in herbage than crested, intermediate, and tall wheatgrass. Hybrid and pubescent wheatgrass had more leaf DM in herbage than other species when defoliated at the 15-cm height, regardless of defoliation frequency. In Exp. B, the proportion of leaf DM in herbage yield was determined by main effects of growing season, wheatgrass species, and defoliation frequency (Table 1). More leaf DM in herbage yield was produced by wheatgrasses in the first vs. second growing season (Fig. 6A) and in response to more frequent clipping (Fig. 6B). Crested wheatgrass had a greater proportion of leaf DM in herbage yield than other species, regardless of defoliation frequency (Fig. 6C).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Interaction of wheatgrass species, defoliation frequency, and intensity on the proportion of leaf DM in herbage yield in Exp. A.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The proportion of leaf DM in herbage yield as a function of (A) growing season, (B) defoliation frequency, and (C) wheatgrass species in Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 
Stubble composition was determined by the main effect of wheatgrass species in both experiments and an interaction of defoliation frequency and intensity in Exp. A (Tables 1 and 2). In Exp. A, hybrid wheatgrass had the greatest proportion of leaf DM in stubble, followed by pubescent, intermediate and crested, and tall wheatgrass (Fig. 7A) . In Exp. B, crested and pubescent wheatgrass had the greatest proportion of leaf DM in stubble, followed by intermediate and tall wheatgrass (Fig. 7B). A greater proportion of leaf DM in stubble was measured in swards defoliated at the 7.5- vs. 15-cm height, regardless of defoliation frequency (Fig. 8) . The 3- vs. 6-wk defoliation frequency reduced leaf DM in stubble in swards defoliated at the 7.5-cm height, but not in swards defoliated at the 15-cm height.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. The proportion of leaf DM in stubble of wheatgrass species in (A) Exp. A and (B) Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. The proportion of leaf DM in stubble as a function of defoliation frequency and intensity in Exp. A. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 
Tiller Dynamics
The number of live tillers before the onset of summer drought was determined by interactions of growing season with wheatgrass species and growing season with defoliation intensity in Exp. A (Table 1). Crested and hybrid wheatgrass produced more tillers in the subsequent growing season, whereas other species had similar tiller numbers in the first and second growing seasons (Table 6). In the first growing season, tiller counts were greatest in tall, hybrid, and crested wheatgrass, followed by pubescent and intermediate wheatgrass. In contrast, hybrid wheatgrass had the greatest, while tall, pubescent, and intermediate wheatgrass the least tiller number in the second growing season.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Interactions of growing season and wheatgrass species on tiller number before and after summer drought in Exp. A.

 
Defoliation intensity did not affect the number of live tillers before summer drought in the first growing season (Fig. 9) . In the second growing season, however, wheatgrasses defoliated at the 7.5-cm height produced more tillers before summer drought than wheatgrasses defoliated at 15-cm height or undefoliated plants. Plants defoliated at the 7.5-cm height produced more tillers before summer drought in the second when compared with the first growing season.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. The number of live tillers before summer drought in response to defoliation intensity in the first and second growing season in Exp. A. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 
In Exp. B, growing season interacted with defoliation frequency and wheatgrass species in determining the number of live tillers before summer drought (Table 2). In the first growing season, tiller numbers were greater in crested, but lower in intermediate wheatgrass at the 3- vs. 6- wk defoliation interval (Fig. 10A) . Intermediate wheatgrass defoliated every 3 wk produced less tillers than the other species. Among species defoliated every 6 wk, tall wheatgrass had the greatest number of live tillers before drought while other wheatgrasses did not differ significantly from each other. Defoliation regimes, compared with undefoliated plants, affected tiller numbers before summer drought in crested and tall wheatgrass in the first growing season (Fig. 10A). Crested wheatgrass defoliated every 6 wk produced fewer tillers than undefoliated plants, but tall wheatgrass produced more tillers than undefoliated plants at both clipping frequencies. Defoliation frequency did not affect the number of live tillers before summer drought in the second growing season (Fig. 10B). All wheatgrass species produced less tillers in the second when compared with the first growing season (Fig. 10B). Wheatgrasses had similar tiller numbers when defoliated every 3 wk. Among wheatgrass species defoliated every 6 wk, pubescent wheatgrass had the greatest and tall wheatgrass had the least tiller number.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. The number of live tillers before summer drought as a function of defoliation frequency and wheatgrass species in the (A) first and (B) second growing season in Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 
The number of regrowing tillers after summer drought was determined in both experiments by interactions of wheatgrass species with defoliation frequency, a three-way interaction of growing season, wheatgrass species and defoliation intensity in Exp. A, and an interaction of growing season with wheatgrass species in Exp. B (Tables 1 and 2). Hybrid (Fig. 11A) and pubescent wheatgrass (Fig. 11A and 11B) produced more regrowing tillers at 6- vs. 3-wk defoliation frequency. In contrast, frequent defoliation increased tiller survival in intermediate wheatgrass (Fig. 11A). Tiller survival of crested and tall wheatgrass was not affected by defoliation frequency in both experiments (Fig. 11A and 11B). Regardless of defoliation frequency before summer drought, crested wheatgrass had the greatest and tall wheatgrass the least number of regrowing tillers among the species evaluated in Exp. A. In Exp. B, pubescent wheatgrass produced more regrowing tillers than tall wheatgrass at the 3-wk clipping frequency, with other species being intermediate (Fig. 11B). Pubescent wheatgrass also produced more regrowing tillers than other species at the 6-wk clipping interval. Tiller survival was similar for defoliated and undefoliated plants in both experiments, except for pubescent wheatgrass (Fig. 11A and 11B). This species produced more regrowing tillers when defoliated every 6 wk when compared with undefoliated plants.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. The number of regrowing tillers after summer drought as a function of defoliation frequency and wheatgrass species in (A) Exp. A and (B) Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 
Growing season modified the interaction of defoliation intensity and wheatgrass species in determining the number of regrowing tillers in Exp. A. In the first growing season, tiller survival of crested and pubescent wheatgrass increased in response to lower defoliation height (Fig. 12A) . Defoliation intensity had no effect on the number of regrowing tillers in the second growing season (Fig. 12B). Crested and pubescent wheatgrass had the greatest number of regrowing tillers among wheatgrasses, independent of defoliation intensity.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12. The number of regrowing tillers after summer drought as a function of defoliation intensity and wheatgrass species in Exp. A in the (A) first and (B) second growing season. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 
In contrast to results of Exp. A, the number of regrowing tillers in Exp. B was greater in all but crested wheatgrass in the second vs. first growing season, regardless of defoliation frequency (Fig. 13) . Tiller survival was similar in all species in the first growing season. In the second growing season, pubescent wheatgrass had the greatest number of regrowing tillers, followed by intermediate, and tall and crested wheatgrass.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 13. The number of regrowing tillers in wheatgrass species after summer drought in the first and second growing season in Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

 
Effects of Wheatgrass Species and Defoliation Regimes on Soil Temperature
There were no significant effects of defoliation regimes or wheatgrass species on daytime and nighttime soil temperatures from May until July and in September during each growing season (data not shown). However, a significant interaction among growing seasons, wheatgrass species, defoliation frequency, and intensity indicated complex responses of daytime soil temperatures to experimental factors during the progress of drought from July until the end of August in the first (1999) and second (2000) growing season (Table 7). In the first growing season, daytime soil temperature was lower in crested than tall wheatgrass swards in all defoliation treatments except for the combination of 3-wk interval at 15-cm height where an opposite response occurred (Table 8). Daytime soil temperature in crested wheatgrass swards was higher at the 15- vs. 7.5-cm defoliation height and the 6- vs. 3-wk clipping frequency. Daytime soil temperature in tall wheatgrass swards, however, was lower at the 15- vs. 7.5-cm defoliation height and increased in response to longer defoliation frequency only at the 7.5-cm defoliation height. In contrast to the first growing season, daytime soil temperature was higher in crested vs. tall wheatgrass swards in the second growing season, regardless of defoliation regimes (Table 8). Daytime soil temperature in crested wheatgrass swards was lower at the 15- vs. 7.5-cm defoliation height and the 3- vs. 6-wk defoliation frequency. In tall wheatgrass swards, daytime soil temperature was lower at the 15- vs. 7.5-cm defoliation height, regardless of defoliation frequency. Within each defoliation intensity, daytime soil temperature increased with longer defoliation frequency.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Probabilities for the main effects and interactions of growing season (S), wheatgrass species (W), defoliation frequency (F), and defoliation height (H) on mean daytime and nighttime soil temperatures during July–August.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8. Interaction of growing season, defoliation intensity, frequency, and wheatgrass species on average daytime soil temperature during July–August.

 
Nighttime soil temperature, similar to daytime soil temperature, was not affected by experimental factors from May until July and in September in both growing seasons (data not shown). During the progress of drought from July until the end of August, nighttime soil temperature was affected by interactions of growing season with wheatgrass species and defoliation frequency, growing season with wheatgrass species and defoliation intensity, and an interaction of wheatgrass species with defoliation frequency and intensity (Table 7).

In the first growing season, nighttime soil temperature was lower in crested vs. tall wheatgrass swards and not affected by defoliation frequency (Table 9). In contrast, crested wheatgrass defoliated every 3 wk had higher nighttime soil temperature than tall wheatgrass, and the difference between the species was not significant at the 6-wk defoliation interval. The 3- vs. 6-wk defoliation interval reduced nighttime soil temperature in crested, but increased in tall wheatgrass swards.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 9. Interactions of defoliation frequency with wheatgrass species and growing season, and defoliation intensity with wheatgrass species growing season on mean nighttime soil temperature from July to August.

 
Nighttime soil temperature was lower in swards defoliated at the 7.5- vs. 15-cm height, regardless of wheatgrass species and growing season (Table 9). In the first growing season, nighttime soil temperature was similar for crested and tall wheatgrass defoliated at the 7.5-cm height, but lower in crested vs. tall wheatgrass defoliated at the 15-cm height. In contrast, nighttime soil temperature was higher in crested vs. tall wheatgrass swards in the second growing season, regardless of defoliation intensity.

Regardless of growing season, defoliation frequency of 6- vs. 3-wk reduced nighttime soil temperature in crested wheatgrass swards defoliated at the 7.5- but not 15-cm height (Table 10). In contrast, nighttime soil temperature in tall wheatgrass was reduced in response to the 3- vs. 6-wk defoliation interval at the 15- but not the 7.5-cm height.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 10. Interaction of defoliation intensity, frequency, and wheatgrass species on mean nighttime soil temperature from July to August. Means are pooled for the first and second growing season.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Wheatgrass Productivity and Survival
Prolonged and frequent drought periods over the course of this research provided a high-stress environment to characterize introduced wheatgrass species. Regardless of weather patterns during the first growing season of each experiment, frequent (3-wk interval) and intensive (7.5-cm height) defoliation resulted in a greater cumulative herbage yield when compared with plants defoliated every 6 wk or at the 15-cm height. In the second growing season, frequent defoliation did not affect cumulative herbage yield, but intensive defoliation reduced it in three out of five wheatgrass species.

Aboveground biomass was also greater in response to frequent defoliation in the first growing season in both experiments, but decreased in the second growing season in Exp. B. This indicates a carryover effect of initial defoliation and growing conditions on grass productivity in the following year (Casler and Goodwin, 1998). An inverse relationship between defoliation frequency and intensity for above- and belowground biomass was shown in several wheatgrass species (Stroud et al., 1985; Binnie and Chestnutt, 1991; McCaughey and Simons, 1996). Other studies, however, indicate frequent defoliation may stimulate herbage production in grasses because of a greater number of vegetative than reproductive tillers in subsequent regrowths (Cook and Stoddart, 1953; Olson and Richards, 1989). Wheatgrasses defoliated every 3 wk were usually in earlier developmental stages at each harvest date than those defoliated every 6 wk (visual observations, data not recorded), which was confirmed by a greater proportion of leaf DM in herbage and stubble of frequently defoliated plants. Baker and Hunt (1961) observed more herbage yield produced by intermediate and pubescent wheatgrass in response to intensive defoliation (5 cm), but tiller numbers increased in response to higher defoliation height (10 cm). This could affect herbage yield in a long-term period.

Precipitation during winter and spring in the second growing season of our experiments was lower than that during the first growing season; therefore, soil water deficits could interact with defoliation regimes affecting regrowth rates (Busso and Richards, 1993). For example, the availability of nitrogen might have been inadequate for growth of intensively defoliated plants, reducing herbage yield when compared with extensively defoliated plants (Guitian and Bardgett, 2000).

The 3- vs. 6-wk defoliation frequency increased leaf production above and below defoliation height. This indicates a faster reestablishment of photosynthetic area and suggests that wheatgrasses may tolerate frequent defoliation (Arredondo et al., 1998; Romo and Harrison, 1999). Several authors suggested the importance of a rapid reestablishment of photosynthesis rather than root reserves as the main source of C for regrowing shoots (Caldwell et al., 1981; Richards and Caldwell, 1985).

Drought tolerance of temperate grasses adapted to semiarid environments is related to the ability to produce a large number of tillers (Sutherland, 1994) and to summer dormancy of tillers (Biddiscombe et al., 1977). In our experiments, effects of defoliation intensity (Exp. A) or frequency (Exp. B) on the number of live tillers before and after summer drought were modified by growing conditions in each season and varied with wheatgrass species.

Defoliation intensity did not affect tiller number of any wheatgrass species before summer drought in the first growing season, but more intensive defoliation increased the number of regrowing tillers in crested and pubescent wheatgrass after summer drought. In Exp. B, more frequent defoliation increased tiller numbers in these two species before summer drought in the first, but not in the second growing season. Crested and pubescent wheatgrass are the most drought tolerant among species evaluated in our experiments (Currie and White, 1982; Frank, 1983) and their responses to defoliation intensity are typical for grazing-tolerant grasses (Cook and Stoddart, 1953; Angel, 1995). The beneficial effect of intensive defoliation on tiller number before summer drought was also present in the second growing season; however, defoliation intensity did not affect tiller survival during summer drought.

These contrasting responses to defoliation intensity could be due to a more severe and longer summer drought in the second (2000) when compared with the first (1999) growing season, and may involve complex interactions of defoliation regimes, C reserves, and drought severity (Volaire, 1994). Another reason might be differences in the rate of soil water loss by transpiration of grass swards in response to defoliation. In the first growing season, the last harvest was made on 12 July because of relatively adequate precipitation in May and June. Plants became dormant thereafter without significant regrowth. This might have reduced evapotranspiration and conserved water in the soil for a longer time in intensively defoliated swards because of reduced leaf area when compared with extensive defoliated swards (Baker and Hunt, 1961; Miller et al., 1990). In contrast, the last harvest in the second growing season was made on 8 June and followed by intensive rainfall events until the beginning of July. Under these conditions, plants continued with regrowth and accumulated a significant amount of herbage. After the onset of drought in July 2000, soil water was probably lost through high evapotranspiration, since no rainfall occurred until October. This apparently resulted in a high tiller mortality, especially in less intensively defoliated plants. Mohammad et al. (1982) found that herbage production and tiller survival of crested wheatgrass and Russian wildrye (Elymus junceus Fish) were greater in defoliated plants (40% defoliation) than undefoliated plants grown at field capacity [-0.03 MPa (-0.3 bar) soil water potential]. The authors questioned the common practice of withholding defoliation of grasses during drought as it had little effect on root growth, but it could reduce transpiration and increase tiller survival. To conserve soil water, herbage growth is removed before summer drought in Mediterranean grasslands (Volaire and Thomas, 1995); however, it is not practiced in grasslands of the Texas Rolling Plains.

Tiller survival was affected by interactions of defoliation frequency and wheatgrass species in both experiments, regardless of growing seasons. Less frequent defoliation increased the number of regrowing tillers in hybrid and pubescent wheatgrass, but decreased it in intermediate wheatgrass. Thus, the effect of defoliation frequency on tiller survival seems to be inconclusive and may also depend on the severity of summer drought (Busso and Richards, 1995). Our data show significant variation among wheatgrass species in tiller survival. Crested wheatgrass had the greatest, whereas tall wheatgrass the least number of regrowing tillers in Exp. A, regardless of defoliation regimes. This was consistent with results presented by Volaire and Thomas (1995) who suggested that tiller mortality was usually higher in late-maturing (i.e., tall wheatgrass) than in early maturing species (i.e., crested wheatgrass), and was related to lower root densities in late-maturing cool-season grasses.

Soil Temperature Effects
Soil temperature was not affected by defoliation regimes nor wheatgrass species during spring and early summer when soil water was not a growth limiting factor, and in late summer when soil moisture was severely depleted in all treatments. With the onset of drought in July 1999 (first growing season) and 2000 (second growing season), effects of defoliation regimes and wheatgrass species on soil temperature became significant. We suggest that responses of soil temperature in wheatgrass swards to defoliation regimes could be related to the amount and composition of stubble biomass left after the harvest before the onset of drought. A greater stubble biomass in swards defoliated at 15-cm height might have caused more shading of the soil surface, which reduced daytime soil temperature and increased nighttime soil temperature (Gianelle et al., 1998; Mika et al., 1998). In contrast, the effect of defoliation frequency on soil temperature was cumulative through the growing season up to the onset of summer drought as it affected sward composition. Swards defoliated at 3-wk intervals had a higher proportion of leaf DM than swards defoliated at 6-wk intervals; therefore, the expected LAI and leaf transpiration area were probably greater in the former swards. It is likely that swards defoliated at 3-wk intervals shaded the soil surface more efficiently than those defoliated every 6 wk. In a similar manner, swards defoliated at the 15-cm height (more biomass) provided more shade when compared with swards defoliated at the 7.5-cm height, reducing daytime and increasing nighttime soil temperature.

The differences in soil temperature between crested and tall wheatgrass may be related to soil–water–plant dynamics. With the onset of drought, grass species adapted to semiarid environments (e.g., crested wheatgrass) deplete soil water, and become dormant faster than less adapted grasses (e.g., tall wheatgrass) (Bittman and Simpson, 1987; Bleby et al., 1997; Wilman et al., 1997). Roots of crested wheatgrass are distributed mostly in the upper soil level (Caldwell et al., 1981), whereas tall wheatgrass has a deep root system (Bleby et al., 1997); therefore, water would be depleted from the upper soil level faster by crested than tall wheatgrass swards (Eissenstat and Caldwell, 1988; Bittman and Simpson, 1989). This could explain the higher daytime soil temperature in crested vs. tall wheatgrass swards in the second growing season when trace amounts of precipitation occurred during summer drought, and tall wheatgrass might have benefitted from water reserves in deeper soil levels. In the first growing season, however, daytime soil temperature was lower in crested than tall wheatgrass swards, except for the defoliation regime of 6-wk interval at the 15-cm height. Apparently, weather patterns in each growing season can modify responses of soil temperature to defoliation regimes differently in each wheatgrass species.

The relationship between defoliation regimes and soil temperature on tiller survival was not consistent in our experiment. In the first growing season, tiller survival of crested wheatgrass was greater in swards defoliated at the 7.5- vs. 15-cm height and tall wheatgrass did not respond to defoliation intensity. More tillers, therefore, survived in crested wheatgrass swards with higher vs. lower daytime, but lower vs. higher nighttime soil temperatures. Perhaps nighttime soil temperatures may affect tiller survival of some wheatgrass species more than daytime soil temperatures during summer drought. Higher nighttime soil temperatures accelerate plant respiration in dense grass swards when compared with short or loose swards and may have a more detrimental effect on plant survival than daytime soil temperatures (Feldhake et al., 1996).


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
These experiments confirm that frequent or intensive defoliation has no detrimental effect on productivity of introduced wheatgrasses in the first growing season, but reduces persistence during summer drought and productivity in subsequent growing season. Species responses should be considered in managing wheatgrass pastures. In the first growing season, crested and pubescent wheatgrass may be defoliated more intensively without significant reduction in productivity and persistence, whereas tall wheatgrass should be defoliated less intensively.

Precipitation patterns during summer drought interact with defoliation regimes in determining the persistence of introduced wheatgrasses in semiarid environments of the Texas Rolling Plains. Defoliation regimes affected soil temperature during summer drought, suggesting nighttime soil temperature be related to tiller survival to a greater extent that daytime soil temperature. With some occasional precipitation during summer drought, all wheatgrass species could persist and their productivity could be maintained in the subsequent growing season. With unusually low precipitation during summer drought, wheatgrass persistence rapidly declined and productivity was low in the subsequent growing season. None of the evaluated wheatgrass species was adapted to prolonged and severe summer drought. In semiarid regions of the Texas Rolling Plains, introduced wheatgrasses are probably limited in their potential to complement forage base for dual-purpose wheat and perennial warm-season grass pastures.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Michelle Armstrong, Kelly Barnett, Matt Angerer, and Scott Showers (Texas A&M Univ., Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Vernon, TX) for technical support. We appreciate comments by Dr. David P. Belesky (USDA-ARS, Appalachian Farming Systems Res. Center, Beaver, WV) and Dr. David D. Briske (Texas A&M Univ., Dep. Rangeland Ecology and Management, College Station, TX) on an earlier version of the manuscript.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. P. Malinowski, J. Kigel, and W. E. Pinchak
Water Deficit, Heat Tolerance, and Persistence of Summer-Dormant Grasses in the U.S. Southern Plains
Crop Sci., October 22, 2009; 49(6): 2363 - 2370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. D. Volesky and B. E. Anderson
Defoliation Effects on Production and Nutritive Value of Four Irrigated Cool-Season Perennial Grasses
Agron. J., March 12, 2007; 99(2): 494 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. A. Hopkins and M. W. Alison
Stand Persistence and Animal Performance for Tall Fescue Endophyte Combinations in the South Central USA
Agron. J., August 3, 2006; 98(5): 1221 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. J. Butler and J. P. Muir
Dairy Manure Compost Improves Soil and Increases Tall Wheatgrass Yield
Agron. J., June 27, 2006; 98(4): 1090 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. A. R. Mian, J. C. Zwonitzer, Y. Chen, M. C. Saha, and A. A. Hopkins
AFLP Diversity within and among Hardinggrass Populations
Crop Sci., October 27, 2005; 45(6): 2591 - 2597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. R. Hendrickson, J. D. Berdahl, M. A. Liebig, and J. F. Karn
Tiller Persistence of Eight Intermediate Wheatgrass Entries Grazed at Three Morphological Stages
Agron. J., September 19, 2005; 97(5): 1390 - 1395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. L. Gillen and W. A. Berg
Response of Perennial Cool-Season Grasses to Clipping in the Southern Plains
Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 125 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. P. Malinowski, H. Zuo, B. A. Kramp, J. P. Muir, and W. E. Pinchak
Obligatory Summer-Dormant Cool-Season Perennial Grasses for Semiarid Environments of the Southern Great Plains
Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 147 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. A. Hopkins, D. P. Malinowski, H. Zhang, and D. W. Walker
Russian Wildrye Seedlings Are Sensitive to Acidic Soil
Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 2187 - 2192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malinowski, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Malinowski, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Malinowski, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ansley, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome