Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Westfall, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Westfall, D. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Westfall, D. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Other Soil Management
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Dryland Cropping Systems
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Soil Analysis
Agronomy Journal 94:944-954 (2002)
© 2002 American Society of Agronomy

DRYLAND CROPPING SYSTEMS

Residue Accumulation and Changes in Soil Organic Matter as Affected by Cropping Intensity in No-Till Dryland Agroecosystems

Rodrigo A. Ortegaa, Gary A. Peterson*,b and Dwayne G. Westfallb

a Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
b Dep. of Soil and Crop Sci., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523

* Corresponding author (gary.peterson{at}colostate.edu)

Received for publication September 14, 2001.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Crop residue is a valuable resource in Great Plains dryland agroecosystems because it aids in water conservation and soil erosion control. The objectives of our research were to (i) determine the effect of cropping intensity, climate gradient, and soil depth on levels and changes in soil C, soil N, and residue parameters after 8 yr of no-till management in dryland cropping systems and (ii) relate soil and residue parameters to soil C and N levels. Surface soil properties and residue parameters were compared in two cropping systems, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–fallow (WF) and wheat–corn (Zea mays L.) or sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]–proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)–fallow (WCMF). The effects were examined on the summit position of a catenary sequence of soils across three environments representing an evapotranspiration (ET) gradient. Soils at the low- and medium-ET sites are classified as Argiustols, and the soil at the high-ET site is an Ustochrept. There was 3.0 Mg ha-1 of residue in the surface 10 cm of soil compared with 2.7 Mg ha-1 of residue on the soil surface averaged over ET gradient and cropping systems. About 90% of the residue in the soil was found within the 2.5-cm soil depth. The highest soil organic C (SOC) and soil organic N (SON) were observed in the surface 0- to 2.5-cm depth. There was a trend (P <= 0.16) for the more intense WCMF cropping system to have higher SOC and SON contents than the traditional WF system (C = 6.6 g kg-1 for WF compared with 7.5 g kg-1 for WCMF and N = 0.70 g kg-1 for WF compared with 0.74 g kg-1 for WCMF). From 1985 to 1993, gains in SOC (967 kg ha-1) and SON (74 kg ha-1) occurred in the surface 0- to 2.5- and 2.5- to 5-cm depths while losses were observed in the 5- to 10-cm depth (SOC = -694 kg ha-1; SON = -44 kg ha-1). Climate strongly modified these effects but did not reflect a clear ET gradient effect. The results suggest that higher levels of surface SOC and SON can be attained by increasing cropping intensity under no-till management.

Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration • SOC, soil organic carbon • SON, soil organic nitrogen • WCMF, wheat–corn (or sorghum)–millet–fallow • WF, wheat–fallow


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
SINCE VIRGIN SOILS of the Great Plains were put under cultivation, their productivity has decreased as a consequence of organic matter losses associated with extensive tillage and extended summer fallow periods. Research has shown that soil C and N levels decline with years of cultivation (Haas et al., 1957; Young et al., 1960; Tiessen et al., 1982) and that this tendency can be minimized or eliminated by converting to soil conservation practices such as no-till or stubble mulch (Dick, 1983; Lamb et al., 1985). Conversion to no-till or stubble mulch practices also greatly influences physical, chemical, and microbiological properties of the soil (Lamb et al., 1985; Mielke and Wilhelm, 1998). Distribution of soil C and N in the surface of soils under no-till management is highly affected because of residue accumulation on the soil surface and the enhancement of microbial activity close to it (Doran, 1980).

Several research projects have focused on the long-term effects of soil management practices on soil characteristics, particularly tillage management (Dick, 1983; Follett and Peterson, 1988; Ismail et al., 1994) and concluded that reduced tillage usually results in improvements in both chemical and physical soil properties. Reeves (1997), in a review of long-term experiments, reported that conservation tillage maintained or even increased soil organic C (SOC) when coupled with more intensive cropping. Summer fallow with intensive tillage, a common practice in more arid environments, results in larger soil organic matter losses than continuous cropping in these same environments (Haas et al., 1957; Ridley and Hedlin, 1968). However, little research has been done to address the effect of cropping intensity on residue accumulation and on soil characteristics under no-till conditions in soils previously managed under conventional tillage practices. Wood et al. (1991), working in the Great Plains of eastern Colorado, found that imposing no-till management on soils previously managed under tilled wheat–fallow (WF) systems altered the depth distribution and contents of SOC and soil organic N (SON) after only 4 yr. They found that surface soil (0–10 cm) SOC and SON contents were maintained at higher levels by more intense cropping systems (less summer fallow time) and were decreased by the less intense WF system. They concluded that higher equilibrium levels of organic C and N can be established in no-till soils through the return of greater amounts of plant residues that accompany greater cropping intensity. Work by Campbell et al. (1990)( 2000) in Saskatchewan, Canada, supports the concept that frequent fallow depletes SOC, and they report that increased crop residue returned to the soil with continuous cropping is the major means of replenishing soil organic matter.

Crop residue production (nonharvested plant parts) and decomposition in the central Great Plains are controlled by water availability. Extrapolation of results to climatic regions beyond local experiments can best be accomplished if linked to climatic factors that control water availability, specifically, climatic precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (ET). Climate in the central Great Plains can be characterized as a grid with two variables: annual precipitation, which ranges from 250 to 450 mm, and open pan evaporation (index of potential ET), which ranges from 1600 to 2000 mm for a growing season (Farnsworth and Thompson, 1982; Peterson and Westfall, 1999). One expects residue accumulation and decomposition rates to vary with these two parameters; therefore, they are a key for interpreting results related to crop residues found on and in the soil.

Time itself can be a major variable when assessing the effects of management changes on soil organic matter levels. Switching from tilled to no-till management practices represents a dramatic change in how C is added to the soil. Intensifying cropping also changes C inputs relative to a WF system. Soil organic matter contents reported by Wood et al. (1991) are a benchmark to which we can compare C and N contents at any following date.

The objectives of this study were to (i) determine the effect of cropping intensity, climate gradient, and soil depth on levels and changes in soil C, soil N, and residue parameters after 8 yr of no-till management in dryland cropping systems and (ii) relate soil and residue parameters to soil C and N levels.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The study was conducted within a long-term experiment located in the Great Plains of eastern Colorado that has the objective of identifying crop and soil management systems that maximize water use and economic return (Peterson et al., 1988, 1993). This experiment includes four driving variables: (i) climate regime, (ii) soils, (iii) management systems, and (iv) time. The climate variable consists of three locations that have approximately the same long-term annual precipitation but have different levels of potential ET, as measured by open pan evaporation: Sterling (low ET, 1016 mm yr-1; 40.37° N, 103.13° W), Stratton (medium ET, 1270 mm yr-1; 39.18° N, 102.26° W), and Walsh (high ET, 1900 mm yr-1; 37.23° N, 102.17° W). The soil variable also has three levels, represented by three slope positions—summit, sideslope, and toeslope—common to a given geographic area that vary in several properties and which are reported in Peterson et al. (1993).

All three sites chosen had been cultivated, mainly in dryland WF or sorghum for more than 50 yr until 1985 when no-till management was established. Management systems (rotations) were placed across the soil sequences at each site and represent the third variable: increased cropping intensity with decreasing summer fallow time. No-till cropping systems are WF, wheat–corn (or sorghum)–fallow, wheat–corn (or sorghum)–proso millet–fallow (WCMF), opportunity crop, and perennial grass, all managed with no-till techniques to maximize water storage potential. Grain sorghum replaces corn at the high-ET site, Walsh. All phases of each cropping system are present every year. For this residue study, only the WF and WCMF systems were sampled. If the reader desires information on the other cropping systems, details are provided by Peterson et al. (1993). The fourth driving variable, time, is present in the sense that the experiment was planned with a minimum time horizon of 20 yr (five cycles of the 4-yr rotation) (Peterson et al., 1988, 1993).

An experimental unit is an individual soil area within a site and within a cropping system. All units are 6.1 m wide but vary in length, depending on the length of the soil catena (ranging from 185–305 m). The experimental design is a split block that includes location (Sterling, Stratton, and Walsh), slope position (summit, sideslope, and toeslope), and cropping system (WF, wheat–corn–fallow, WCMF, opportunity, and grass) variables in two blocks (Peterson et al., 1988, 1993).

Fertilizer N is applied to each experimental unit according to soil tests performed for each soil, within each rotation and specific for the crop present in a given year (Peterson et al., 1988, 1993).

Selected Plots and Sampling Procedure
We selected two of the no-till cropping systems, WF and WCMF on one slope position (summit) across the three locations (ET gradient), for the residue reported herein. Table 1 contains a summary of initial soil properties measured in 1986 and the average amount of N fertilizer applied. We chose the fallow phase preceding wheat planting, in both the WF and WCMF systems, as the experimental unit for sampling. Thus, by our sampling time in June 1993, WF had produced four wheat crops and had approximately 56 mo of fallow during the 8-yr period. The WCMF system had produced two wheat crops, two corn (sorghum) crops, two millet crops, and had approximately 24 mo of fallow during the same period.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Soil classification, initial (1986) soil organic C (SOC) and soil organic N (SON) and annual N fertilizer application by location.{dagger}

 
Three intact soil cores (5-cm-diam. and 2.5-cm-long aluminum cylinders) were obtained from each selected plot from the 0- to 10-cm depth in 2.5-cm depth increments. Surface residue was excluded from the 0- to 2.5-cm depth samples. Bulk density was determined using these same samples. The bulk density values for 1985 and 1989 were taken from Wood (1990).

An area of 30 by 75 cm was excavated in each plot to a depth of 10 cm, in 2.5-cm increments, to determine soil residue distribution. Surface plant residues and residues from soil layers were collected separately. Plant residues were separated from each soil layer using water under high pressure and a 0.6-mm sieve. Remaining soil particles were then separated from residues by flotation of the residue.

Sample Preparation and Laboratory Analysis
Soil cores were air-dried, finely ground (0.2 mm), and analyzed for organic C and N. We measured SOC by wet oxidation (Nelson and Sommers, 1982). Total soil N was determined colorimetrically, following a micro-Kjeldahl procedure (Bremmer and Mulvaney, 1982), with a Lachat autoanalyzer (Lachat QuickChem Syst., Mequon, WI). The total soil N procedure did not include NO3–N, and extractable NH4–N was subtracted from total soil N to obtain SON.

Plant residues were oven-dried at 70°C, finely ground (0.2 mm), and analyzed for total C and N. Carbon was determined by the diffusion method (Snyder and Trofymow, 1984).

Total N in the residues was determined colorimetrically, following a micro-Kjeldahl procedure (Bremmer and Mulvaney, 1982). Residues from the surface and residues from the 0- to 2.5-cm soil depth also were analyzed for acid detergent fiber (ADF), cellulose, and lignin (Goering and Van Soest, 1970).

Experimental Design and Data Analysis
The treatment arrangement was a 3 x 2 x 4 factorial in a split-split block experimental design, with two replications, that included location [Sterling (low ET), Stratton (medium ET), and Walsh (high ET)] as main plots, cropping system (WF and WCMF) as split-blocks, and soil depth (0–2.5, 2.5–5, 5–7.5, and 7.5–10 cm) as the split-split block. At each field location, cropping systems were randomly assigned to strips within each block. Depths in our analysis were treated as parallel to cropping systems within each block. The assumption is that the correlation between all depths is the same for all pairs of depths, and although this may result in some inaccuracy, it is still a commonly used procedure (P. Chapman, personal communication, 1999). An example of the basic analysis of variance (ANOVA) is given in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Analysis of variance considering location, cropping system, and depth.

 
Changes in SOC, SON, and C/N ratio from 1985 to 1993 and from 1989 to 1993 were analyzed. The values for 1985 and 1989 were taken from Wood (1990). We averaged the three observations per selected plot before the statistical analysis.

Analyses of variance were performed using the procedure GLM of Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (SAS Inst., 1991), testing for all main effects and interactions. A paired t-test procedure (Ott, 1993) was performed to compare SOC and SON gains from 1985 to 1989 and from 1989 to 1993. Correlation and regression analyses among soil and residue parameters were performed using procedures CORR and REG in SAS (SAS Inst., 1991).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Soil Variables
Surface soil properties are highly affected by conversion to no-till systems and by the amount of residues left on the soil surface, which in turn directly depends on cropping intensity. The effects of cropping intensity on the levels and changes of some surface soil properties after 8 yr of no-till practices are discussed below.

Soil Organic Carbon, Soil Organic Nitrogen, and Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio
Carbon and Nitrogen Contents
Surface soils (0–2.5 cm) had the highest organic C and N contents, ranging from 4.5 to 13.3 g C kg-1 and from 0.4 to 1.2 g N kg-1. The C/N ratio also was larger for this surface soil layer. Soil organic C, SON, and soil C/N ratio all decreased with depth across locations and cropping systems. For SOC and SON, however, the degree to which they were affected depended on the location because the location x depth interaction was significant (Table 3). The interaction occurred because the stratification of SOC and SON was more pronounced at the low- and medium-ET locations (Sterling and Stratton, respectively) than at the high-ET location (Walsh).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Soil organic C (SOC), soil organic N (SON), and soil C/N ratio in 1993 as affected by location [evapotranspiration (ET) gradient], cropping system, and depth increment.

 
At the low- and medium-ET locations (Sterling and Stratton, respectively), significant accumulations of both SOC and SON occurred in the surface 5-cm depth, with no differences from 5 to 10 cm while at the high-ET location (Walsh), significant accumulations occurred only in the surface 2.5 cm (Fig. 1) . This effect can be explained by larger amounts of residue being produced at the low- and medium-ET locations than at the high-ET location. Accumulation of SOM in surface soil under no-till conditions has also been observed by other researchers (Doran, 1980; Dick, 1983; Wood et al., 1991; Franzluebbers et al., 1994). The influence of no-till practices on SOM seemed to reach no deeper than the 5-cm depth at our sites after 8 yr of no-till management.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Soil organic C (SOC) and N (SON) content averaged over cropping systems as affected by the interaction of location [evapotranspiration (ET) gradient] and soil depth.

 
There was a trend (P <= 0.16) for the more intense WCMF cropping system to have higher SOC and SON contents than the traditional WF system (Table 3). Franzluebbers et al. (1994) reported that SOC and total Kjeldahl N increased with increasing C input associated with more intensive cropping systems over the long term. Even in conventionally tilled systems, cropping intensification can increase SOC, as reported by Varvel (1994).

Changes in Soil Carbon and Nitrogen (1985–1993)
Changes in SOC, SON, and soil C/N ratio in the surface soil (0–10 cm) were calculated for two periods, 1985 to 1993 and 1989 to 1993. The changes that occurred during the first 4 yr after conversion to no-till (1985–1989) were reported by Wood et al. (1991). Since conversion to no-till management in 1985, gains in SOC, SON, and C/N ratio generally occurred in the surface 0- to 2.5- and 2.5- to 5-cm soil depths (Table 4). Losses were observed in the 5- to 10-cm soil depth, irrespective of cropping intensity. However, the magnitude of these effects depended on location because the location x depth interaction was significant for SOC and SON (Table 4). There were gains in SOC and SON down to the 5-cm soil depth at the medium- and high-ET sites (Stratton and Walsh, respectively) while at the low-ET site (Sterling), gains occurred just in the surface 0- to 2.5-cm soil. Moreover, SOC and SON losses in the 5- to 10-cm soil depth were larger at the low-ET site (Sterling) compared with the medium- and high-ET sites (Stratton and Walsh, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Changes in soil organic C (SOC), soil organic N (SON), and soil C/N ratio, from 1985 to 1993, as affected by location [evapotranspiration (ET) gradient], cropping system, and depth increment.

 
The largest increase in C/N ratio occurred in the 0- to 2.5-cm depth, independent of location or cropping system. Net increases in the whole 0- to 10-cm soil depth were observed at the medium- and high-ET locations (Stratton and Walsh, respectively) while a net loss occurred at the low-ET site (Sterling) when averaged over cropping systems. We had expected that gains in SOC and SON would be greatest at the low-ET site (Sterling) and lowest at the high-ET location (Walsh) because of the greater biomass additions at the low-ET site. We cannot explain the results of the low-ET location. Precipitation records showed that at the three locations, 4 out of the 7 yr previous to our sampling year (1993) had precipitation above the long-term average. Considering the period January 1986 to May 1993, annual precipitation was 2, 4, and 10% higher than the long-term average at low-, medium-, and high-ET locations (Sterling, Stratton, and Walsh, respectively). Woods et al. (1991), working at these locations, reported gains of SOC and SON in the 0- to 2.5-cm layer, small gains or losses in the 2.5- to 5-cm depth, and losses in the 5- to 10-cm layer after 4 yr of no-till. At that time, they suggested that the experiment had not had sufficient time for location (ET gradient) to have a consistent effect on depth distribution of SOC and SON.

After 8 yr of no-till, the more intense cropping system (WCMF) tended (P <= 0.25) to gain SOC and SON and have a wider C/N ratio while the less intensive WF appeared to lose SOC and SON and have a narrower C/N ratio. Because of its larger biomass production, we expected that WCMF would gain more SOC and SON and would have a wider gain in soil C/N ratio than WF in the first 0- to 2.5-cm layer and that these differences would be evident, even in deeper layers in the WCMF system. Wood et al. (1991) found that more intense cropping increased SOC more in the 0- to 2.5-cm layer than the less intensive WF on summit positions.

Changes in Soil Carbon and Nitrogen (1989–1993)
There were gains in SOC and SON in the 0- to 2.5- and 2.5- to 5-cm depths and losses in the 5- to 10-cm layer during the period of 1989 through 1993. The magnitudes of these changes were 0 to 2.5–>2.5 to 5–>5- to 10-cm soil depths (Table 5). For SON, these effects depended on location and cropping system because the corresponding three-way interaction was significant. The interaction is explained by differences in the magnitude of the changes in SON among soil depths, across locations and cropping systems, although we observed no definite pattern.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Changes in soil organic C (SOC), soil organic N (SON), and soil C/N ratio, from 1989 to 1993, as affected by location [evapotranspiration (ET) gradient], cropping system, and depth increment.

 
The surface 0- to 2.5-cm soil depth increased in C/N ratio only at the high-ET site (Walsh). Differences in the magnitude of the change in C/N ratio among soil depths were significant at only this location (Table 5). We expected the 4-yr rotation to gain more SOC and SON and have a wider gain in C/N ratio than WF, at least in the first 0 to 2.5 cm, but the effect of cropping system was not significant (Table 5).

Changes in Soil Carbon and Nitrogen by Rotational Period
When comparing the gains in SOC and SON, at three soil depths and for the rotational periods 1985 to 1989 and 1989 to 1993, we found that equal gains in SOC occurred in the 0- to 2.5-cm depth during both rotational periods. A larger gain in SON occurred in this soil layer during the second rotational period (1989–1993) compared with the first 4 yr after conversion to no-till (Fig. 2) . A net gain in SOC and SON was observed in the 2.5- to 5-cm layer during the second rotational period compared with a net loss during the first period. In the 5- to 10-cm layer, similar net losses in SOC and SON were observed in both periods.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Change in soil organic C (SOC) and N (SON) by soil depth for the first 5-yr period (1985–1989) and the second 5-yr period (1989–1993) averaged over locations [evapotranspiration (ET) gradient] and cropping systems.

 
Considering the whole 0- to 10-cm soil layer, we only observed net gains in SOC during the second rotational phase. There was only a trend (P < 0.35) for an increase in SON during the second rotational phase. It is likely that changes in C and N in the second rotational phase may be a consequence of cumulative effects of no-till management. Furthermore, soil changes that occur because of lack of tillage, like formation of more stable and larger aggregates, may have begun to influence the direction and magnitude of C and N accumulation.

Residue Variables
The amount of residue found on the soil surface and within the surface soil is directly affected by the factors controlling biomass production and microbial decomposition. In our case, these factors are represented by location (ET gradient) and cropping system. From this point on, we will define surface residue as that on the soil surface, and residue in the soil layers will be identified as soil residue. Residue quality also is a function of the crop types in a particular cropping system and of the degree of decomposition undergone by the residue before the sampling time. Differences between residue located on the soil surface and the residue present within soil layers are expected because of their possible different nature (shoots vs. roots) and opportunity for decomposition.

Soil and Surface Residue Quantity and Carbon and Nitrogen in Residue
Quantity of soil residue decreased dramatically with depth and interacted with cropping system (Fig. 3) . We found maximum residue levels in the 0- to 2.5-cm depth in the WCMF system, but only in the surface soil did WCMF have more residues than WF. Differences in residue quantity between the first soil layer and following depths were larger for WCMF than for WF, which was mirrored by the amount of residue C (Fig. 4) . Residue N decreased with depth as one would expect, but there was no interaction between soil depth and cropping system for N (Fig. 4).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Soil residue quantity as affected by the interaction of soil depth and cropping system. WF, wheat–fallow; WCMF, wheat–corn (or sorghum)–millet–fallow.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Carbon and N quantities in the soil residue as affected by the interaction of soil depth and cropping system. WF, wheat–fallow; WCMF, wheat–corn (or sorghum)–millet–fallow.

 
When comparing cropping system, on the average, WCMF had 256% more surface residue than WF, but systems did not differ in soil residue (Table 6). We found larger differences between cropping systems at the high-ET location (Walsh) compared with the low- and medium-ET locations (Sterling and Stratton, respectively). Interestingly, the average amount of soil residue in the surface 10 cm of soil was similar to the amount on the soil surface averaged over locations and cropping systems (Table 6). These effects probably occurred because of larger crop biomass production with WCMF as a result of greater cropping intensity (Peterson et al., 1993).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Surface and soil residue (0–10 cm depth) as affected by location and cropping system.

 
Soil Residue Carbon and Nitrogen Contents and Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio
Various authors (Doran, 1980; Staley et al., 1988; Wood et al., 1990) have found that under no-till conditions, a larger microbial biomass and greater C and N mineralization potentials are found near the soil surface. Therefore, changes in residue composition are expected in surface soil layers.

Neither cropping system nor ET gradient affected the soil residue composition in this study. Only soil depth had a significant effect on residue C and N content and C/N ratio (Table 7). Residue C and N content increased with depth as did the residue C/N ratio. The lowest contents for C and N were generally observed in residues found nearest the surface (0–2.5 cm), which occurs because of greater C and N mineralization in this layer.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Soil residue C and N content and C/N ratio as affected by soil depth averaged over evapotranspiration (ET) gradient (location) and cropping system.

 
Comparison of Surface Residue and Residue Found within the Surface 0 to 2.5 cm of Soil
Little information is available regarding the amount and quality of residue in shallow soil layers under no-till conditions. Comparisons of surface residue with soil residue also are scarce. The impact of cropping intensity on residue amount and quality is even less well known. A comparison of surface residue with soil residue in the surface 0 to 2.5 cm of soil is presented below.

Residue Carbon and Nitrogen Contents and Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio
Residue C and N contents and C/N ratio were highly dependent on residue position (Fig. 5) regardless of location (ET gradient). Surface residue had a higher C content but smaller N content than the residue found in the first 0 to 2.5 cm of soil. Consequently, the C/N ratio for surface residue was wider than for residue in the 0- to 2.5-cm soil depth. Differences in residue as related to position were probably due to differences in age. Surface residue is younger than that found in the 0- to 2.5-cm soil depth, which had been continually accumulating in this layer since the experiment started. Age determines the degree of microbial decomposition. Rate of decomposition would be faster for residue that was in the soil (soil residue) compared with surface residue. The different composition of surface residue compared with soil residue is another reason for residues being different. At the soil surface, a straw-like residue was found while in the 0- to 2.5-cm soil depth, we identified a mixture of partially decomposed residue coming from the surface and crop roots.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Carbon and N content and C/N ratio of the residue as affected by position averaged over location [evapotranspiration (ET) gradient] and cropping system.

 
Amount of Residue and Amounts of Carbon and Nitrogen in Residue
The amounts of residue present in the soil and on the soil surface and the amounts of C and N contained in them were larger for WCMF than for WF. This was evident by the significant cropping system x residue position interaction. Surface residue quantity was larger than the amount in the first 0- to 2.5-cm soil layer in the WCMF cropping system but not in the WF rotation (Fig. 6) . The same situation occurred with C in residue, but the opposite occurred for N in residue where the 0- to 2.5-cm soil residue had a larger amount of N than surface residue just in the WF cropping system (Fig. 7) . We explain these results by differences between cropping systems in above- and/or belowground biomass production, and/or surface residue losses by wind or other means, and/or opportunity for residue decomposition. Further research would be needed to elucidate which are the most important factors controlling the accumulation of surface and soil residue.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Quantity of surface and soil (0–2.5 cm depth) residue averaged over location [evapotranspiration (ET) gradient] as affected by the interaction of cropping system and residue position. WF, wheat–fallow; WCMF, wheat–corn (or sorghum)–millet–fallow.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Carbon and N in surface and soil (0–2.5 cm depth) residue averaged over location [evapotranspiration (ET) gradient] as affected by the interaction of cropping system and residue position on quantity. WF, wheat–fallow; WCMF, wheat–corn (or sorghum)–millet–fallow.

 
Acid Detergent Fiber, Cellulose, and Lignin Contents of the Residue, and Lignin/Nitrogen Ratio
The ADF and lignin contents are measures of the amount of recalcitrant material present in residue. On the other hand, cellulose content is an indication of the amounts of C and N that are more easily available for decomposition. In our case, these different components are indices of both the degree of decomposition and residue quality. Tian et al. (1995) have shown that lignin content was more highly correlated with residue resistance to decomposition than any other single organic component and that its importance was equivalent to C/N ratio. Thus, a high lignin and low cellulose content may indicate that a particular residue has undergone decomposition and/or its initial quality in terms of potential nutrient mineralization is low. Residue position relative to the soil surface affected ADF, cellulose, and lignin contents of the residue (Fig. 8) . The ADF and lignin contents were higher in soil residue than in surface residue, but cellulose content was lower in the soil residue than in the surface residue. Position of residue also tended (P <= 0.07) to affect the lignin/N ratio but was not significant at the 5% probability level (Fig. 8). These results reflect the degree of residue decomposition as lignin content was greatest for residue found in the 0- to 2.5-cm soil depth.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Surface and soil residue (0–2.5 cm depth) characteristics, averaged over location [evapotranspiration (ET) gradient] and cropping system. ADF = acid detergent fiber; * = significant at 0.05 probability level; NS = not significant at the 0.05 probability level.

 
Location had a significant effect on ADF, lignin content, and lignin/N ratio but not on cellulose. The high-ET location (Walsh) had the smallest contents of ADF and lignin and also a smaller lignin/N ratio compared with the low- and medium-ET locations (Sterling and Stratton, respectively). This could be the consequence of lower decomposition rates at Walsh resulting from less water availability and/or of differences in plant species because sorghum replaces corn at this location. Based on published values for lignin, cellulose, and ADF in sorghum, millet, and corn, it is not likely that the difference was caused by plant species because the range in lignin, cellulose, and ADF values for these crops overlap to a great extent (Bilbro et al., 1991; Tian et al., 1995; Lamm and Ward, 1981).

Cropping system did not affect cellulose content of residues but did affect their lignin and ADF content (P <= 0.1). According to these findings, WCMF would potentially mineralize more N than WF because of its lower ADF and lignin content. However, these results also could mean that WF had undergone more decomposition than WCMF, which is reflected by its higher lignin content.

Relationship between Some Selected Soil and Residue Variables
Considering All Soil Depths
Correlation analysis showed that SOC, SON, and soil C/N ratio were all related (P <= 0.01) to the amount of residue present in all soil layers (Table 8). When using a linear model, the amount of residue in the soil explained 35, 22, and 30% of the variability in SOC, SON, and soil C/N ratio, respectively. These results are in general agreement with those of many authors (Larson et al., 1972; Black, 1973; Rasmussen et al., 1980; Rasmussen and Parton, 1994). Generally, however, surface residue has been used instead of soil residue to study crop residue influence on SOC and SON.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8. Relationship between amount of residue in all soil layers{dagger} and some selected soil properties (n = 48).

 
Relationship between Surface Residue and Soil (0- to 10-cm Depth) Variables
Surface residue was positively correlated (P <= 0.05) with soil residue in the 0- to 10-cm depth (r = 0.53) and the amounts of C (r = 0.69) and N (r = 0.59) in the residue. Soil residue increased linearly as surface residue increased. Theoretically, when no residue was present on the surface, there was almost 2000 kg ha-1 of residue remaining in the 0- to 10-cm soil layer. Every 100 kg ha-1 increase in surface residue increased the amount of residue in the 0- to 10-cm soil layer by 40 kg ha-1.

No significant relationship (P >= 0.05) existed between surface residue and SOC or SON in any soil depth. These results do not agree with those of Wood et al. (1990), who reported that after 4 yr of no-till, a quadratic relationship existed between added residues and surface (0–5 cm depth) SOC concentration. The different conclusion probably occurred because we correlated measured soil surface residue with SOC while they correlated SOC with the total amounts of residue produced or added by the crops over time.


    SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Eight years after establishing the no-tillage treatments, a clear stratification of SOC and SON in the upper 0 to 10 cm of soil was observed. We found the highest SOC and SON contents and the widest C/N ratio in the surface 0- to 2.5-cm depth. Climate strongly modified these effects but did not reflect a clear ET gradient (location) effect. There was a trend (P <= 0.16) for the more intense WCMF cropping system to have higher SOC and SON contents than the traditional WF system.

From 1985 to 1993 and from 1989 to 1993, gains in SOC, SON, and C/N ratio occurred in the surface 0 to 2.5 cm and in the 2.5 to 5 cm of soil while losses were observed in the 5- to 10-cm soil depth. However these effects depended on ET gradient (location) in the former case and on ET gradient (location) and cropping system in the latter period. Also, the direction of the ET gradient effect was not consistent in either case.

Soil organic C and SON buildup was directly related to the amount of residue present in each soil layer, but no relationship was observed between the amount of surface residue and SOC and SON.

There were differences in amount and quality between surface residue and 0- to 2.5-cm soil residue. In some cases, cropping system modified this effect. Potentially, WCMF would mineralize more N than WF because of its larger amounts of C and N and average better residue quality in terms of ADF and lignin content compared with WF. However it is possible that by the sampling time, WF could have undergone more decomposition than WCMF, as evidenced by its narrower C/N ratio and larger ADF and lignin contents.

The results of this study suggest that the production of greater amounts of above- and belowground plant residues promoted by greater cropping intensity under no-till management can create higher levels of organic C and N in the surface soil. Results also demonstrate the need for a permanent monitoring of changes in soil properties when studying the effects of cropping intensity under no-till conditions and indicate that the residue found within surface soil layers is an important factor to consider when interpreting these effects.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
U. M. Sainju, A. Lenssen, T. Caesar-Thonthat, and J. Waddell
Carbon sequestration in dryland soils and plant residue as influenced by tillage and crop rotation.
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1341 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. E. Clay, C. G. Carlson, S. A. Clay, C. Reese, Z. Liu, J. Chang, and M. M. Ellsbury
Theoretical Derivation of Stable and Nonisotopic Approaches for Assessing Soil Organic Carbon Turnover
Agron. J., April 11, 2006; 98(3): 443 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
U. M. Sainju, A. Lenssen, T. Caesar-Tonthat, and J. Waddell
Tillage and Crop Rotation Effects on Dryland Soil and Residue Carbon and Nitrogen
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 668 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. A. Sherrod, G. A. Peterson, D. G. Westfall, and L. R. Ahuja
Soil Organic Carbon Pools After 12 Years in No-Till Dryland Agroecosystems
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 25, 2005; 69(5): 1600 - 1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
C. A. Campbell, H. H. Janzen, K. Paustian, E. G. Gregorich, L. Sherrod, B. C. Liang, and R. P. Zentner
Carbon Storage in Soils of the North American Great Plains: Effect of Cropping Frequency
Agron. J., March 1, 2005; 97(2): 349 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. L. Wright and F. M. Hons
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Storage in Aggregates from Different Tillage and Crop Regimes
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2005; 69(1): 141 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
K. F. Bronson, T. M. Zobeck, T. T. Chua, V. Acosta-Martinez, R. S. van Pelt, and J. D. Booker
Carbon and Nitrogen Pools of Southern High Plains Cropland and Grassland Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2004; 68(5): 1695 - 1704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. L. Wright and F. M. Hons
Soil Aggregation and Carbon and Nitrogen Storage under Soybean Cropping Sequences
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2004; 68(2): 507 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
L. A. Sherrod, G. A. Peterson, D. G. Westfall, and L. R. Ahuja
Cropping Intensity Enhances Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen in a No-Till Agroecosystem
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2003; 67(5): 1533 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Westfall, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Westfall, D. G.
Agricola