Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lory, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lory, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lory, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Maize Management
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Remote Sensing
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Plant Nutrition
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Nitrogen
Agronomy Journal 94:397-404 (2002)
© 2002 American Society of Agronomy

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT

Calibrating Corn Color from Aerial Photographs to Predict Sidedress Nitrogen Need

Peter C. Scharf* and John A. Lory

Dep. of Agron., 210 Waters Hall, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

* Corresponding author (scharfp{at}missouri.edu)

Received for publication January 17, 2001.

    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Supplemental N need of corn (Zea mays L.) and other crops can vary substantially within and among fields. Corn color is sensitive to N status and may provide a means to accurately match N fertilizer rates to spatially variable N needs. Our objective was to calibrate the relationship between corn color measured in aerial photographs and sidedress N need. Economic optimum N rate (EONR) at sidedress was determined in 18 yield response experiments located in production cornfields. Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial photographs were taken at growth stage V6 or V7 with two types of film: color positive and color infrared. The EONR ranged from 0 to 336 kg N ha-1. For both types of film, corn color was a significant predictor of EONR at sidedress but only when expressed relative to the color of well-fertilized corn in the same field and when no N had been applied at planting. Predictions were more accurate using color film than color-infrared film. Removal of soil pixels from the true-color aerial images greatly strengthened the relationship between measured color and EONR: R2 values ranged from 0.27 to 0.31 for single colors measured from the entire image and from 0.60 to 0.79 after the removal of soil pixels. Our results demonstrate that corn color measured in aerial photographs can be used to predict sidedress N need. Obstacles to practical use in guiding variable-rate sidedressing include: no N can be applied at planting, a high-N reference strip is needed, and soil pixels must be removed from the image.

Abbreviations: EONR, economic optimum nitrogen rate • NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index • NIR, near infrared


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
NITROGEN RATE EXPERIMENTS have demonstrated that, under existing corn production conditions in the midwestern USA, N fertilizer need of corn can vary widely, both among fields (Schmitt and Randall, 1994; Bundy and Andraski, 1995) and within fields (Malzer et al., 1996; Blackmer and White, 1998). This variation may be caused by variations in both N supply and N demand. Producers, however, almost always apply the same N fertilizer rate to whole fields and vary N fertilizer rates minimally, if at all, over whole farms. Matching N fertilizer rates to spatially varying N needs could produce both economic and environmental benefits.

Economic benefits would result from N fertilizer savings in areas that would otherwise be overfertilized and from yield increases in areas that would otherwise be underfertilized. The net benefit is not likely to be large after paying technology and management costs.

Environmental benefits would result from a reduction in the amount of surplus N in the production system. Overfertilization as a form of insurance is common. The difference between the applied N rate and the economic optimum N rate (EONR) is a strong predictor of soil water NO-3 concentration and residual soil NO-3 after harvest (Andraski et al., 2000). Net percolation in humid regions of the midwestern USA occurs primarily between harvest and the following spring; NO-3 or labile N present in the soil after harvest will be susceptible to movement out of the root zone with the percolating water. This N can then move to ground water, or it can move to surface water via drainage (Fenelon and Moore, 1998; David et al., 1997) or base flow (Steinheimer et al., 1998). Nitrogen rates in excess of crop need can radically increase postharvest NO3–N accumulation in soil (Schuman et al., 1975; Rice et al., 1995) and the amount of N entering streams via subsurface base flow (Burwell et al., 1976). Nitrate in drinking water is a human health concern, and N in surface water has been implicated in coastal and estuarine eutrophication, including a hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico (Turner and Rabalais, 1994).

Corn color is related to its N status. Nitrogen-deficient corn reflects more light over the entire visible spectrum than N-sufficient corn (Al-Abbas et al., 1974; Blackmer et al., 1994) and usually reflects less near-infrared (NIR) radiation than N-sufficient corn (McMurtrey et al., 1994). Differences in reflectance are usually greatest for wavelengths 550 to 600 nm (Blackmer et al., 1994; McMurtrey et al., 1994). These reflectance differences are associated with differences in chlorophyll concentrations in leaves (Hong et al., 1997).

Minolta chlorophyll meters have been widely used to quantify corn color and N status (e.g., Piekielek and Fox, 1992; Sims et al., 1995). Research has shown that they can be used to translate corn color into N management decisions, including sidedress N rate recommendations (Piekielek et al., 1997; Blackmer and Schepers, 1995; Varvel et al., 1997). However, collecting enough data to adequately characterize field-scale or sub-field-scale N status is labor intensive. A large number of readings is required because each reading represents only a small leaf area (<2 mm diam.). These readings must be spatially well distributed over the field or subfield, and each reading requires hand-clamping the meter on a leaf.

Information about corn color from aerial photographs or satellite images is potentially cheaper, more robust (because the leaf area being sampled is many orders of magnitude greater), and more spatially detailed than information collected with chlorophyll meters. Pioneering research has shown that corn color (especially the red and green regions) measured in late-season aerial photographs is quantitatively related to N stress and yield (Blackmer et al., 1996; Blackmer and White, 1998; Blackmer and Schepers, 1996). Beatty et al. (2000) showed a high correlation (R2 > 0.90) between midseason (near silking) chlorophyll meter measurements of corn and airborne hyperspectral radiance measurements over a wide range of wavelengths, about 510 to 630 nm. This type of information is most useful if it can be obtained when there is still time to respond to deficiencies with a N fertilizer application—tasseling at the latest and preferably at a time when sidedress N applications can be made without requiring high-clearance equipment.

The large proportion of soil that is visible in a nadir (straight down) view of corn at normal times of N sidedressing presents a major technical obstacle to measuring corn color from aerial or satellite images. Walburg et al. (1982), using ground-based radiometers to measure canopy reflectance, found that they were able to clearly distinguish extreme N deficiencies by the eight-leaf stage but apparently no sooner. Although many indices have been developed to correct for soil color in mixed soil–plant views, their aim has almost universally been to accurately assess plant cover—with little concern for the color of the plants—despite variations in soil color. Only very recently have attempts been made to develop indices that are sensitive to plant color in a mixed soil–plant scene (Daughtry et al., 2000; Gitelson et al., 1996; Baret and Fourty, 1997; Clarke et al., 2000). We hypothesized that pixel sorting in very high resolution images (to discard soil pixels) would be a viable alternative to indices for accurately measuring corn color at stages V6 to V7 (growth stages described by Ritchie et al., 1993), despite the presence of a large proportion of soil in the images.

Our objective was to extend earlier work in three ways: (i) to calibrate corn color measured from aerial photographs not only to detect N stress, but also to predict the amount of N needed in response to the stress; (ii) to do so at a time when sidedressing can still be accomplished without high-clearance equipment; and (iii) to do so across a broad range of production environments. We anticipate that these calibrations could be used to transform aerial photographs into maps to direct variable-rate sidedress N applications.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Field Procedures
Experiments were established in production cornfields in Missouri in 1997 and 1998, with a total of 18 site-years. Experiments were located in all four major corn-producing regions of Missouri (Fig. 1) and represented a broad cross section of soils, hybrids, climate, and management practices that are typical for corn production in Missouri (Table 1). Our findings should thus apply to a broad population of cornfields in the region.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Locations of on-farm small-plot N rate experiments in corn.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Background information for on-farm small-plot N rate and timing experiments.

 
Treatments were rates and timing of N fertilizer. Plots were four rows wide and 12 m long. Ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) was surface-applied with a custom-built hand-push Gandy spreader, which was calibrated for all N rates immediately before treatment application. At Locations 1 through 16, rates ranged from 0 to 336 kg N ha-1. Timing was either (i) at planting (0, 28, 56, 84, 112, 140, 168, 196, 224, 280, or 336 kg N ha-1), (ii) at sidedress (growth stage V6 to V7, same rates as at planting), or (iii) 112 kg N ha-1 at planting followed by sidedress rates ranging from 0 to 224 kg N ha-1 in 28 kg N ha-1 increments. The latter set of treatments was not included at manured sites. Treatment Groups ii and iii allow independent measurement of optimum sidedress N rate with 0 N at planting and optimum sidedress N rate with 112 kg N ha-1 at planting. The experimental design was completely randomized with two replications. Three zero-N plots were used because of the importance of this point in the regression. Treatments for Locations 17 and 18 are described by Scharf et al. (2000). All cultural practices other than N fertilizer application and harvest were performed by cooperating producers.

Experiments also contained additional treatments that received 0, 112, or 224 kg N ha-1 at planting and additional N at times later than V7. Yield results from these treatments are not reported here. These treatments were also intended to be used to characterize the average V6–V7 color associated with these three planting N rates at each location. At V6 to V7, each location had 16 plots that had received zero N at planting, 10 plots that had received 112 kg N ha-1 at planting, and 10 plots that had received 224 kg N ha-1 at planting available for color measurements.

Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter readings were taken from the uppermost collared leaf at V6 or V7. Readings were taken from 10 plots with each of three planting N rates (0, 112, or >=224 kg N ha-1) at each site. Readings were taken on 20 plants per plot in 1997 and 10 plants per plot in 1998, except at Locations 1, 4, 8, and 9 where only five plants per plot were measured due to time constraints.

The center two rows of each plot were hand-harvested (1.5 by 6 m). Harvest population was also determined in this area. Grain was shelled and weighed, and grain moisture was determined with a hand-held moisture meter. Yields were corrected to a moisture of 150 g kg-1.

Determination of Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rate
When population effects on yield were observed, yields were corrected to the mean population for the location. Grain yield response to N rate was modeled as a quadratic-plateau function using PROC NLIN in SAS. An F-test was used to compare a single model vs. separate models for the different timing treatments at each location. Economic optimum N rate was calculated for each location using a N/grain price ratio of 5:1. PROC UNIVARIATE in SAS was used to compute the probability that EONR was distributed normally.

Photograph Acquisition and Color Measurements
Aerial photographs were taken from an altitude of approximately 150 m at growth stage V6 or V7. The low altitude of the photographs was selected to achieve very fine pixel size, which we anticipated would be critical for differentiating between soil and plant. We used both color-positive (Kodak Elite Chrome 100, Kodak, Rochester, NY) and color-infrared (Kodak Color-IR) film in 35-mm format. A yellow filter was used with the color-infrared film. Some photographs were taken in sunny weather and some in overcast conditions. Severe overexposure of color-infrared images for Locations 10, 11, and 16 precluded their use in our analyses.

All scanning and image analysis procedures were identical for both film types. Photographs were digitized with a slide scanner (Nikon LS-10E, Nikon, Tokyo) at 1064 cm-1 resolution. Pixel size of the digitized images was typically 2.5 to 3 cm. Each pixel was associated with 8-bit (i.e., ranging from 0–255) values for red, green, and blue. With the color-infrared film, these values corresponded to the intensity of NIR, red, and green light, respectively, striking the film. (In the Results section, reference will be made to the color of light exposing the film rather than to the color of the pigment developed on the film.)

Adobe Photoshop was used to extract color measurements from the digitized images. Median values for red, green, and blue were recorded for the center two rows of each measured plot and also for the plant pixels selected from the center two rows of each plot (Fig. 2) . Plant pixels were selected using the color range selection procedure in Adobe Photoshop. The input parameters for this procedure are typical plant color and fuzziness. Higher fuzziness values select pixels with colors farther from the chosen color, but we do not know the algorithm used by the Photoshop program to make this selection. Parameter values were selected independently for each image that successfully, in the judgement of the person analyzing the image, separated plant pixels from soil pixels over the range of plant and soil colors encountered in that image. Plant pixels selected in this way usually represented about 50% of the total pixels in a given area. We feel that this sorting was relatively conservative and erred on the side of retaining some nonplant pixels in preference to discarding any plant pixels. Our analysis of nadir-view photographs taken from about 2 m above the canopy usually scores only 25 to 40% of the pixels as plant material at V6 to V7.



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Close-up view of a single four-row plot showing an example of plant pixel selection in the center two rows.

 
Color measurements were taken for three sets of plots at each experiment: plots receiving no N fertilizer at planting, plots receiving 112 kg N ha-1 at planting (except in manured experiments), and plots receiving >=224 kg N ha-1 at planting. We observed vignetting, or concentric gradients of brightness, in our aerial photographs. Vignetting was probably exacerbated by the low altitudes at which the photographs were taken and by the relatively short (50 mm) focal-length lenses used, resulting in different angles from camera to target to sun at different points in the photograph. We did not expect absolute color measured from the aerial photographs to be very useful due to variations in light conditions, camera settings, and film processing between locations; the observed vignetting is one more reason why absolute color would not be useful. In order to minimize the effect of vignetting on relative color measurements, readings were taken from closely grouped sets of three plots (0, 112, and >=224 kg N ha-1 at planting). At most locations, we were able to identify about eight such sets of three plots from which to take readings. Relative color was then calculated as the color value from a 0 or 112 kg N ha-1 plot divided by the value for the same color from the nearby >=224 kg N ha-1 plot. If a zero-N plot was in a brighter-than-average part of the photograph, the nearby high-N plot would also be brighter than average, and relative colors should be fairly accurate.

Relating Color Measurements to Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rate
Experiments were designed to determine the EONR for each experiment with zero N at planting and also, independently, with 112 kg N ha-1 at planting and to measure plant color at V6 on plots that had received these planting N rates. Regression analysis was used to identify color measurements that would be useful to predict optimum sidedress N fertilizer rate. Because EONR is a property of an experimental location, all color measurements used in these regressions were location averages. Thus, for a given color measurement, each nonmanured experiment produced two data points (one for zero N at planting and one for 112 kg N ha-1 at planting) relating color to optimum sidedress N rate, and each manured experiment produced only one data point (for zero N at planting because the treatments with 112 kg N ha-1 at planting followed by sidedress N rates were omitted, as were sidedress color measurements from plots receiving 112 kg N ha-1 at planting).

In addition to absolute and relative red, green, and blue values from color film, absolute and relative red/blue, green/blue, and red/green ratios were tested. The ratios with blue in the denominator were based on the idea that blue might serve as a normalization factor because blue reflectance of individual corn leaves has been reported to be relatively insensitive to leaf N status (McMurtrey et al., 1994; Blackmer et al., 1994). The red/green ratio was suggested by results reported by Daughtry et al. (2000). From color-infrared film, absolute and relative NIR, red, green, green/NIR (Bausch and Duke, 1996; Schepers et al., 1996), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI; Tucker, 1979), and green NDVI (Gitelson et al., 1996) were tested along with an approach suggested by Daughtry et al. (2000) in which NIR/green is plotted against NIR/red and the slope is indicative of chlorophyll concentration. The best single-variable predictors of EONR were tested in combination with all other color variables from the same film type.

Relative colors from photographs were also regressed against relative SPAD chlorophyll meter readings as an indicator of the quality of the color measurements obtained from the photographs. Experimental unit was again location, and location averages were used for all color measurements in this analysis. Relative SPAD meter values were thus based on a minimum of 50, and more commonly 100 or 200, readings per location.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rates
Yield responses to N fertilizer are presented graphically in Fig. 3 . We concluded that there was no evidence of a timing effect on N response functions in these experiments, and all N timings were used in calculating a single yield-response model for each location. Only at one location (Location 10) was yield response to N better described ({alpha} = 0.05) by separate models for the different timing treatments than by a single model across all timings; this would be expected by random chance with this {alpha} and population size. Economic optimum N rate ranged from 0 to 336 kg N ha-1 in these experiments, with a mean of 156 kg N ha-1, a standard deviation of 96 kg N ha-1, and no evidence of nonnormality.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Corn yield response to N rate and timing in 18 on-farm small-plot experiments. EONR, economic optimum N rate.

 
Predicting Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rate from Corn Color in Aerial Photographs
No absolute color values, absolute color ratios, or absolute indices from either type of film were significant predictors of EONR. With color film, red, green, and blue relative to high-N plots were highly significant predictors of EONR; with color-infrared film, infrared, red, green, and NDVI relative to high-N plots were highly significant predictors of EONR (Table 2). No other ratios or indices were significant predictors of EONR. This suggests that a high-N reference area will be necessary to predict N need from aerial photographs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Ability of selected color measurement from V6–V7 stage aerial photographs to predict optimum N rate at sidedress.

 
Accuracy of EONR prediction was optimized using relative color measured from color film, on plant pixels only, with no N applied at planting (Table 2; Fig. 4) . With 112 kg N ha-1 applied at planting, none of the color measurements significantly predicted EONR at sidedress, and relative color varied little from 1.0.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between corn color measured in aerial photographs and economic optimum N rate (EONR) at sidedress. Only data with zero N at planting are shown. The two best predictors of EONR among all color measurements tested were (a) green and (b) blue light radiance relative to high-N plots after removal of soil pixels from images. The circled data point is discussed in the text.

 
The quality of EONR prediction from color film was greatly improved by removing soil pixels from the images and taking color measurements only from plant pixels; this was not true for color-infrared film (Table 2). With color film, R2 values were 0.31, 0.27, and 0.27 for blue, green, and red, respectively, measured from the entire image, and 0.79, 0.70, and 0.60, respectively, measured after the removal of soil pixels. The quality of the prediction for blue light was at least equal to the quality for green and red light. This is in contrast to the findings of Blackmer et al. (1996), who reported that blue light reflectance was more weakly correlated with N status (as reflected in grain yield) than red and green reflectance. The relatively lower correlation for red light in our data may be due to high red reflectance by soil and a high proportion of soil background in our images. Soil background would not have been a factor for Blackmer et al. (1996), whose images were acquired well into the reproductive stage. Developmental stage may also influence which wavelengths are most affected by N deficiency.

Removing soil pixels from the images also improved the correlations between relative corn color from aerial photographs and relative chlorophyll meter readings (Table 3). Though our pixel-sorting algorithm was poorly defined, this provides evidence that it did in fact result in better estimates of plant color.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Relationship between relative color (zero N/high N) from aerial photographs and relative color from a Minolta SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter.

 
The higher R2 for blue as a predictor of EONR, relative to green, appears to be an artifact of one unusual location, Location 15. We observed a large difference in greenness between unfertilized and high-N corn but a modest EONR at this location; the data point is circled in Fig. 4a. This site-year was highly unusual in that we found <1 kg ha-1 mineral soil N to 90 cm at planting but about 80 kg N ha-1 at sidedress time. Our interpretation is that the low availability of N early in the season greatly reduced or delayed pigment development (green light absorption more than blue), but relatively high in-season net mineralization resulted in a modest EONR. When this location is removed, R2 values for blue and green are 0.80 and 0.81, respectively. Neither relationship was significantly improved by the addition of any other color measurements.

Color measurements from color-infrared film were less useful for predicting EONR. For 15 locations for which we have data, relative green was the best predictor of EONR, with R2 = 0.50 when measured from the whole image with either 0 or 112 kg N ha-1 at planting. Unlike color film, discarding soil pixels or eliminating plots that had received 112 kg N ha-1 at planting did not improve the quality of prediction. However, the locations where planting N caused the most difficulties with predicting N need from color film (10 and 11) were missing from this analysis.

Implications for Use in Nitrogen Fertilizer Management
Timing is a critical question for N management based on corn color measurements. Chlorophyll meter readings have mainly, in nonirrigated production, been calibrated for corn growth stage V6 to maximize ease of N application. A majority of the nadir view of a corn field at this stage is soil—which, if corn color is to be remotely sensed, represents noise masking the information contained in crop color. We regard our results as proof of concept that pixel sorting in high-resolution images (Fig. 2) is a viable solution to this problem and can be used to obtain crop color measurements that are predictive for N need. Though color measurements were significantly related to N need without pixel sorting, the quality of that relationship was greatly improved by sorting.

Application of this concept to produce variable-rate N recommendation maps for whole fields would require much larger film size (to produce comparable resolution in whole-field images) and the development of a consistent and known pixel-sorting algorithm. Both acquisition and processing of extremely high resolution images at a commercial scale present substantial technical obstacles. The vignetting problems that we experienced might be minimized or eliminated with longer focal lengths.

The index approaches (Gitelson et al., 1996; Baret and Fourty, 1997; Clarke et al., 2000) to assessing plant color in a mixed scene have a great advantage over our approach in that they do not require ultra-high resolution images. However, these indexes have to date only been tested via laboratory measurements and computer simulation (Gitelson et al., 1996; Daughtry et al., 2000) or ground-based spectroradiometry (Baret and Fourty, 1997; Clarke et al., 2000). Green NDVI (Gitelson et al., 1996) did not prove to be well related to corn N need in our data set. Nor did there appear to be any relationship between optimum N rate and position on a NIR/red vs. NIR/green grid as proposed by Daughtry et al. (2000). We were unable to test the other two approaches due to the need for middle-infrared (Baret and Fourty, 1997) or far-red (Clarke et al., 2000) bands. Baret and Fourty (1997) acknowledge that "for low leaf area indices, the discrimination between different levels of chlorosis will be difficult."

Even when soil pixels were removed from images, variations in soil color within an experiment were reflected in the measured plant colors—plots with lighter soil gave lighter plant color measurements (data not shown). This may be due to transmission of soil-reflected light through the leaves or at the edges of leaves. Thus, large variations in soil color in a field are likely to reduce the quality of plant color–based sidedress N rate recommendations that can be produced from aerial photographs for that field.

One potential weakness in extrapolating from our results to field-scale recommendations is the distance between the high-N reference area and the area to be fertilized. In these experiments, the distance was very short, in particular because of the way that we compensated for vignetting in the photographs. With greater distances, the quality of the N rate recommendations could go down.

In addition to the technical obstacles to sidedressing N based on aerial photographs, there are major management and risk obstacles. Few producers currently use sidedress N management for corn. Those who do usually have finished applying N by growth stage V6, which is probably the earliest stage at which color can reliably predict N need. To wait until stage V6 to obtain photographs and then process the photographs to produce variable-rate application maps leaves a very narrow window of time to apply the N before the corn is too tall for conventional sidedressing equipment. Having high-clearance N application equipment available would be necessary to avoid an unacceptably high risk of not being able to apply N fertilizer to the field. Even with the capability for high-clearance N application, an extended wet period could preclude application or delay it enough to reduce yields. Insurance policies have been suggested as a possible way to manage this kind of risk (Green, 1999).

Making a modest N application at planting and then sidedressing based on corn color from aerial photographs would present several advantages over sidedress-only management: The amount of yield loss associated with being unable to sidedress due to weather would be much lower, and probably not all fields would need to be sidedressed. Unfortunately, when 112 kg N ha-1 had been applied at planting, we were not able to find any significant relationships between corn color in aerial photographs at stage V6–V7 and EONR.

Inability to relate corn color to EONR when N had been applied at planting might suggest that color would also poorly predict EONR for manured fields. However, the five manured site-years (of which two were N responsive) in this study followed very much the same relationship between color and EONR as the nonmanured experiments.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
A wide range of optimum sidedress N rates was observed in this group of 18 on-farm experiments. Corn color measured in aerial photographs at sidedress time (stage V6–V7) could accurately predict optimum sidedress N rate but only when the following conditions were met: (i) no N applied at planting, (ii) soil pixels removed from the image, and (iii) color expressed relative to the color of well-fertilized corn in the same field. These conditions represent obstacles to the practical application of this research. Nonetheless, our results demonstrate the potential for making accurate variable-rate sidedress applications of N for corn based on information from aerial photographs.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Emmett and Jim Burke, John Waggoner, David Bentley, Russell Flair, Fred and Ryland Utlaut, Bob Zeysing, Melvin Keehart, David Copeland, Johnny Haer, Max Kurtz, Duane Biermann, Karl Noellsch, Dale Goers, Randall Smoot, Alan Adam, Larry Abell, Kenny Brinker, and Tom, Bill, and John Becker for their interest, cooperation, comments, and generosity in allowing us to work on their farms. For help with field work, data collection from aerial photos, and data organization, we are grateful to Tom Anderson, Dave Hoehne, Pieter Los, Eric Feutz, Andrea Peltzer, Vicky Hubbard, and Bettina Coggeshall. For manuscript review and suggestions, we thank Craig Roberts, Craig Daughtry, and Jim Schepers. This work was made possible by financial support from the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, the Missouri Commercial Agriculture Program, Farmland Industries, and the Missouri Precision Agriculture Center.


    NOTES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Contrib. from the Missouri Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Ser. no. 13086.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. P. Sripada, R. W. Heiniger, J. G. White, and A. D. Meijer
Aerial Color Infrared Photography for Determining Early In-Season Nitrogen Requirements in Corn
Agron. J., June 5, 2006; 98(4): 968 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. C. Scharf, S. M. Brouder, and R. G. Hoeft
Chlorophyll Meter Readings Can Predict Nitrogen Need and Yield Response of Corn in the North-Central USA
Agron. J., May 3, 2006; 98(3): 655 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. P. Sripada, R. W. Heiniger, J. G. White, and R. Weisz
Aerial Color Infrared Photography for Determining Late-Season Nitrogen Requirements in Corn
Agron. J., September 19, 2005; 97(5): 1443 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. R. Raun, J. B. Solie, M. L. Stone, D. L. Zavodny, K. L. Martin, and K. W. Freeman
AUTOMATED CALIBRATION STAMP TECHNOLOGY FOR IMPROVED IN-SEASON NITROGEN FERTILIZATION
Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 338 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
K. F. Bronson, T. T. Chua, J. D. Booker, J. W. Keeling, and R. J. Lascano
In-Season Nitrogen Status Sensing in Irrigated Cotton: II. Leaf Nitrogen and Biomass
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2003; 67(5): 1439 - 1448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. A. Lory and P. C. Scharf
Yield Goal versus Delta Yield for Predicting Fertilizer Nitrogen Need in Corn
Agron. J., July 1, 2003; 95(4): 994 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lory, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lory, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lory, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Maize Management
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Remote Sensing
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Plant Nutrition
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Nitrogen


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome