Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (56)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aparicio, N.
Right arrow Articles by Royo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aparicio, N.
Right arrow Articles by Royo, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Aparicio, N.
Right arrow Articles by Royo, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Crop Genetics
Agronomy Journal 92:83-91 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy

AGROCLIMATOLOGY

Spectral Vegetation Indices as Nondestructive Tools for Determining Durum Wheat Yield

Nieves Aparicioa, Dolors Villegasa, Jaume Casadesusb, José Luis Arausc and Conxita Royoa

a Centre UdL-IRTA, Alcalde Rovira Roure 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain
b Servei de Camps Experimentals, Barcelona, Spain
c Unitat de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultat de Biologia, Univ. de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

conxita.royo{at}irta.es


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Remote sensing measurements may be a useful tool for quantifying crop development and yield. Our objective was to study the potential of using spectral reflectance indices to provide accurate and nondestructive estimates of physiological traits determining yield in durum wheat [Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum (Desf.) Husn.]. Twenty-five genotypes were grown under rainfed and irrigated conditions in northeastern Spain. Reflectance from the vegetation at different growth stages was measured and the following spectral indices calculated: simple ratio (SR), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and photochemical reflectance index (PRI). Crop dry mass (CDM), leaf area index (LAI), and green area index (GAI) were measured. All the indices and grain yield were greater under irrigated than rainfed conditions. LAI was the crop growth trait that most closely correlated with the spectral reflectance indices, with SR and PRI being the best and the worst indices, respectively, for the assessment of crop growth and yield. In rainfed conditions, the spectral reflectance indices measured at any crop stage were positively correlated (P < 0.05) with LAI and yield. Under irrigation, correlations were only significant during the second half of the grain filling. The integration of either NDVI, SR, or PRI from heading to maturity explained 52, 59, and 39% of the variability in yield within genotypes in rainfed conditions and 39, 28, and 26% under irrigation. Our results suggest that for durum wheat, the usefulness of the SR and NDVI for calculating green area and grain yield is limited to LAI values < 3.

Abbreviations: CDM, crop dry mass • GAI, green area index • GAP, green area per plant • GDD, growing degree-days • LAI, leaf area index • NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index • NIR, near-infrared radiation • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • PRI, photochemical reflectance index • RUE, photosynthetic radiation-use efficiency • SR, simple ratio. **, Significant at the 0.01 probability level


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
DURING THIS CENTURY, wheat breeders have made extensive use of the classical empirical approach, evaluating grain yield per se as the main selection criterion (Loss and Siddique, 1994). However, different rates of breeding progress have been achieved in different environments. Whereas the genetic gain under high-yielding environments has been particularly successful, in other areas such as the Mediterranean region where durum wheat is one of the main cereal crops, progress has been much slower (Slafer et al., 1993). Indeed, the empirical breeding approach has obtained only modest yield increases in this region, where drought during the last part of the crop cycle is a major factor in limiting cereal yield (Ceccarelli and Grando, 1996).

The use of morphological and physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for grain yield is an alternative breeding approach. This has come to be known as analytical breeding (Richards, 1982), and implies a better understanding of the factors controlling development, growth, and grain yield (Shorter et al., 1991). In recent years, many selection criteria based on morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits have been suggested (see, for example, in relation to durum wheat: Dib et al., 1994; Loss and Siddique, 1994; Nachit et al., 1992), but rarely adopted in any breeding program. The limited success to date of the analytical approach may be due to a lack of understanding of the physiological factors most directly involved in determining yield, in addition to the absence of proper methods for evaluating them in a rapid, routine manner (Blum, 1988, p. 223; Loss and Siddique, 1994; Richards, 1996). Among the most promising screening methods are those that allow a quick screening of physiological traits that can integrate the performance of the crop either over time (i.e., during plant cycle) or at the organizational level (i.e., whole plant, canopy) (Araus, 1996; Richards, 1996).

While productivity is determined by reference to many processes, the factors determining yield can be divided, in a simple approach, into a small number of integrative physiological traits. For example, the potential yield of a crop over a given period of time and under particular growing conditions is determined by three major processes or integrative traits (Hay and Walker, 1989, p. 250): first, the interception of incident solar irradiance by the canopy; second, the conversion of the intercepted radiant energy to potential chemical energy; and third, the harvest index. Whereas harvest index has to date been the only trait successfully used to improve yield primarily under optimum conditions (Slafer et al., 1993, and references therein), the other two processes, which are responsible for the overall crop biomass, are particularly affected by drought and other related stresses (Sinclair, 1988).

The first of these processes (interception of incident solar radiation) depends on the photosynthetic area of the canopy, while the second (conversion to potential chemical energy) relies on the overall photosynthetic efficiency of the crop. The measurement of spectra reflected by crop canopies at different wavelengths through the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and near-infrared radiation (NIR) regions of the electromagnetic spectrum can estimate simultaneously, and in a rapid nondestructive manner, photosynthetic traits such as canopy green area and radiation-use efficiency (RUE), important attributes in determining yield (Araus, 1996; Field et al., 1994; Peñuelas, 1998). Such estimations are made using spectral reflectance indices, which are formulations based on simple operations between the reflectances at given wavelengths (e.g., ratios and differences).

The most widespread application of these indices is in the assessment of those characteristics related to the total photosynthetic area of the canopy. The most widely used spectral vegetation indices are the SR and the NDVI (see Materials and Methods for their calculation). These indices have been correlated positively (either on a linear or a logarithmic basis) with CDM, LAI, GAI, and the fraction of PAR radiation absorbed by the canopy in small-grain cereals such as bread wheat and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) (Bellairs et al., 1996; Fernández et al., 1994; Field et al., 1994; Peñuelas et al., 1997). However, these studies have been carried out in a small number of genotypes, which restricts the use of such techniques for breeding purposes. Besides, no results have been published on durum wheat until now (Carlson and Ripley, 1997; Peñuelas, 1998). Nevertheless, the ordinary methods of measuring biomass in cereal plots involve a destructive and tedious sampling, which is not suitable for routine assessment in plant breeding. In this context, the spectral vegetation indices have the potential to provide a nondestructive and fast estimate of plant biomass production. Moreover, the photosynthetic radiation-use efficiency (RUE, the second component in the above identity) of the PAR absorbed by the canopy has been correlated with the PRI (Filella et al., 1996; Gamon et al., 1992, 1997; Peñuelas et al., 1994, 1995). This highlights the potential interest of spectroradiometrical techniques for agronomical and plant breeding purposes.

Although spectral reflectance indices have been used to assess yield in cereals such as bread wheat, barley, rice (Oryza satira L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], information on the performance of these indices for durum wheat is needed. Such assessment is particularly relevant under Mediterranean conditions, where most of the durum wheat is grown. In addition, the lack until recently of field portable spectroradiometers has restricted the application of this technique to breeding programs, where the routine assessment of large amounts of germplasm is necessary. In this context, our objective was to study the performance of the NDVI, SR, and PRI, assessing changes (during the second half of the crop cycle) in biomass and green area, as well as in the final yield of durum wheat. Since drought stress is the main constraint on durum wheat production in Mediterranean conditions, the evaluation of these spectral reflectance indices was carried out, in this study, in environments with contrasting water availability. As Wiegand et al. (1991) point out, if most uncertainty in yield prediction by spectral reflectance indices is site-dependent, then it is necessary to relate yield vs. these indices across good and poor environments within the production area. In addition, Daughtry et al. (1983) suggested that when the correlation between grain yield and spectral indices is obtained on a single observation date, it must be used with caution. Therefore, the additive effect of the vegetative indices (SR and NDVI) during the crop cycle, which account for differences in yield, was further evaluated. Indeed, it has been reported that yield can be calculated from successive measurements of spectral vegetation indices during the growing season (Daughtry et al., 1992; Rudorff and Batista, 1990; Wiegand and Richardson, 1990; Wiegand et al., 1991).


    Materials and methods
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Experimental Setup
Two field experiments were done in 1997 under irrigated and rainfed conditions in Lleida, northeastern Spain. The irrigated site (41°39' N, 0°51' E) was medium-high in fertility with a fine-loamy, calcareous, mesic Aquic–Xerofluvent soil, with a pH of 8.4. The rainfed site (41°41' N, 1°12' E) was a Fluventic–Xerochrept soil, deep alluvial of moderately fine texture and high water-holding capacity, with a pH of 8.2.

Twenty-five durum wheat genotypes, including four Spanish commercial cultivars (Altar-Aos, Jabato, Mexa, and Vitrón), and 21 cultivars and advanced lines from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)–International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) durum wheat breeding program (Awalbit, Bicrecham-1, Chacan, Chahra-1, Haurani, Korifla, Krs/Haucan, Lagost-3, Lahn/Haucan, Massara-1, Moulchahba-1, Mousabil-2, Omlahn-3, Omrabi-3, Omruf-3, Quadalete//Erp/Mal, Sebah, Stojocri-3, Waha, Zeina-1, and Zeina-2), representing a wide range of genetic variability, were sown in an {alpha}-lattice design, with four replicates. Both trials were sown on 3 Dec. 1996 in 12-m2 plots (six rows, 20 cm apart). The experimental plots were divided into two 5-m-long subplots. One of these was used for successive destructive samplings of biomass; the other half remained intact for radiometric and grain yield determinations. Sowing density was 550 viable seeds m-2 .

Before sowing, the irrigated trial was fertilized with 50 kg N ha-1, 120 kg P ha-1, and 165 kg K ha-1 and the rainfed trial with 32 kg N ha-1, 60 kg P ha-1, and 60 kg K ha-1. The trials were top-dressed at the onset of jointing with 100 kg N ha-1 at the irrigated site and with 84 kg N ha-1 at the rainfed site. Climatic data during the growing season are summarized in Table 1 . The water available for the crop from seedling to the onset of jointing (mid-March, when irrigation began) was similar under both irrigated and rainfed environments. Under irrigated conditions, the crop was flooded–irrigated three times (50 mm of water on each occasion) at monthly intervals during the spring. The total amount of water available for the crop was 462 and 257 mm for irrigated and rainfed trials, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Monthly means of daily maximum (Tmax), minimum (Tmin), and mean (Tmean) temperatures, and total water (rainfall + irrigation) received by the crop (P) under irrigated (I) and rainfed (R) conditions in the 1997–1998 crop season (Lleida, Spain)

 
Biological and radiometric measurements were carried out at Stages 45 (booting), 55 (heading), 65 (anthesis halfway), 75 (medium milk-grain), and 87 (hard dough grain, which hereafter will be referred to as physiological maturity), of the Zadoks decimal code (Zadoks et al., 1974).

Growth Indices and Grain Yield
Zadoks stage was determined weekly for each plot. For biomass determinations, at each sampling the plants contained in 0.5 m row length (40–50 plants) were pulled up at random from a central row in each plot, and five representative plants per plot were taken at random and separated into leaves, culms and spikes. The leaf area (one side) was measured using a leaf-area meter (DIAS II, Delta-T Devices, Cambridge, UK). Yellow and dry leaves were excluded from the measurement. The samples were oven-dried at 80°C for 48 h and weighed. Crop dry mass (g m-2), green LAI, and total GAI were calculated for each plot as follows: , where N = number of plants m-2 of soil and M = mass (g of the aerial part) plant-1; LAI = N x LAP, where LAP = leaf area plant-1, and GAI = N x GAP, where GAP = green (leaf plus culm and projection of the spike) area plant-1. Thermal time was calculated in growing degree-days (GDD) by summing the daily values of mean temperature, with a base temperature of 0°C (Gallagher, 1979).

Plots were mechanically harvested on 8 July and 25 June 1997 for irrigated and rainfed trials, respectively. Grain yield (kg ha-1) was determinated on a plot basis, and is reported at a 100 g kg-1 moisture level.

Spectral Reflectance Measurements
Canopy reflectance was detected with a narrow-bandwidth visible–near-infrared portable field spectroradiometer fitted with an 18° field-of-view optic (Model FieldSpec UV/VNIR, Analytical Spectral Devices, Boulder, CO). The instrument detects 512 continuous bands (with a sampling interval of 1.4 nm) from 350- to 1050-nm wavelengths, thereby covering the visible and near-infrared portion of the spectrum. Individual scans were remotely triggered from a portable computer and saved to disk for subsequent analysis. The measurements were made at midday under cloudless conditions. All spectral measurements were taken with the sensor at a zenith angle of 60°, with the field of view optic mounted on a tripod 1.5 m above the soil and with the radiometer in a nadir orientation. Three spectral reflectance measurements (1–2 s each) were taken at each plot, each being the average of five scans. The reflectance spectrum was calculated in real time as the ratio between the reflected and the incident spectra on the canopy, where the incident spectrum was periodically obtained from the light reflected by a white reference panel (Spectralon, Labsphere, North Sutton, NH). The Spectralon is very close to a lambertian surface. Reflectance standard measurements were made on each of the five plots. Further, radiometric indices were calculated from spectral reflectance measurements. Vegetation indices were calculated from the comparison between visible and near-infrared reflectance. Thus, the NDVI was calculated as (R900 - R680)/(R900 + R680) and the SR as R900/R680, following Peñuelas et al. (1997). The PRI is given as (R531 - R570)/(R531 + R570) (Gamon et al., 1992; Peñuelas et al., 1995). In all cases, Rn is the reflectance at the wavelength (in nm) indicated by the subscript. The reflectance values used in the calculation of SR, NDVI, and PRI include reflection by the canopy as well as reflection by the soil background. The reflection spectrum of the soil background was homogeneous in each site and similar in the two sites.

Statistical Analysis
{alpha}-Lattice analysis was used to analyze biomass, reflectance indices, and grain yield data; the least square means were obtained by the MIXED procedure of the SAS/STAT statistical package (SAS Inst., 1987). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to study the relationship between radiometric indices and biological variables. The percentage of grain yield variation explained by the progressive addition of each spectral reflectance index measured at different growth stages was assessed by means of the coefficient of determination of a multilineal fitting.


    Results
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Genotype Performance
Grain yield showed significant differences (P < 0.001) across genotypes, but the two groups of germplasm used in this study (Spanish and CIMMYT–ICARDA genotypes) did not differ in their productivity. Grain yield ranged from 3371 to 5927 kg ha-1 under irrigation and from 1647 to 2955 kg ha-1 under rainfed conditions. Mean yield values across genotypes were 5064 and 2063 kg ha-1 for the irrigated and rainfed trials, respectively (Table 2) . The best genotype under irrigated conditions was Bicrecham-1, with a yield 75% higher than Mousabil-2, the least productive genotype; under rainfed conditions, Zeina-1 outyielded Omlahn-3 by 80%. Genotypic performance for grain yield was not consistent across environments, since there was no relationship (P > 0.05) between grain yield under irrigated and rainfed conditions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Genotypic means for durum wheat grain yield (kg ha-1) and the vegetation spectral indices normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), simple ratio (SR), and photochemical reflectance index (PRI), measured at anthesis under irrigated and rainfed conditions

 
Differences among genotypes for LAI and the spectroradiometrical indices within both environments were statistically significant (Table 2). Leaf area index at anthesis ranged from 1.6 (Omlahn-3) to 3.1 (Quadalete//Erp/Mal) under irrigation, and from 0.9 (Lagost-3) to 2.2 (Chacan) under rainfed conditions (Table 2). Regarding spectroradiometrical indices, under irrigation Altar-Aos showed the highest values for NDVI, SR, and PRI and Omlahn-3 had the lowest values for NDVI and SR, but the lowest PRI was recorded for Stojocri-3. Under rainfed conditions, Zeina-1 had the highest values for the three spectroradiometrical indices and Lagost-3, Omlahn-3, and Mousabil-2 showed the lowest values for NDVI, SR, and PRI, respectively. Genotypic ranking for those traits was different in the two environments. No differences were found for LAI or any of the spectroradiometrical indices between the two groups of genotypes studied. Significant differences across genotypes and between environments were also found for the biomass indices CDM and GAI (data not shown).

Effect of Environment and Ontogeny on Crop Growth and Spectral Reflectance Indices
All the crop growth indices (CDM, LAI, and GAI) and spectral reflectance indices (NDVI, SR, and PRI) studied were higher under irrigated than under rainfed conditions. However, significant G x E interactions appeared for some of them. Except for CDM, the differences between environments for all these parameters were already significant at booting and remained so until maturity (Table 3) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Mean values (± 1 SD) for the growth indices crop dry matter (CDM, g m-2), leaf area index (LAI), green area index (GAI), and the vegetation spectral indices normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), simple ratio (SR), and photochemical reflectance index (PRI), measured for durum wheat at different growth stages under irrigated (I) and rainfed (R) conditions (Lleida, Spain)

 
Changes in CDM from booting to maturity, however, followed different patterns under irrigated and rainfed conditions (Table 3). In both environments, CDM increased from booting to heading. However, while under rainfed conditions CDM seemed to reach a plateau during grain filling, under irrigation it continued to increase from anthesis to physiological maturity. These patterns of CDM indicate that, under rainfed conditions, increases in grain mass compensated for losses in vegetative dry mass due to plant senescence; under irrigation, grain mass accumulation largely surpassed plant senescence losses (Table 3). The maximum LAI was recorded at booting for both irrigated and rainfed environments. Thereafter, LAI under rainfed conditions decreased progressively until maturity, whereas LAI in the irrigated environment remained fairly steady until about mid-grain filling, when it decreased sharply. Green area index under irrigation increased from booting to anthesis, coinciding with ear emergence, and maintained similar values during the first half of the grain filling, only to decrease dramatically after the milk-grain stage. Under rainfed conditions, GAI was at its highest point at booting, thereafter decreasing until maturity was attained.

Simple ratio in both environments showed a fairly similar pattern to that of LAI during grain filling, decreasing progressively after anthesis (Table 3). The pattern of changes in SR from booting to anthesis resembled closely those of GAI; thus, while SR increased under irrigation, it decreased under rainfed conditions. Normalized difference vegetation index also diminished during grain filling, although more slowly, and showed the same pattern of changes as SR, although not to such an extreme extent. Photochemical reflectance index decreased in both environments from anthesis to maturity.

Relationship between Crop Growth and Spectral Reflectance Indices
Significant (P < 0.05) positive correlations between CDM and the vegetation indices NDVI and SR were observed only at milk-grain stage in the irrigated environment and at physiological maturity in the rainfed environment (Table 4) . Crop dry mass was positively correlated with PRI only at physiological maturity under irrigation. Spectral reflectance indices correlated better with the photosynthetic (leaf and total) area of the canopy than with CDM, particularly in the rainfed environment. In this environment, LAI, and to a slightly lesser extent GAI, showed significant positive correlations with SR and NDVI (and to a lesser degree with PRI) measured at any of the growth stages assayed. In the irrigated environment, the relationships were lower and only significant during the second half of the grain filling period.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Pearson correlation coefficients of the relationship across genotypes between durum wheat crop dry mass (CDM), leaf area index (LAI), and green area index (GAI), and the vegetation spectral indices normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), simple ratio (SR), and photochemical reflectance index (PRI), at different growth stages under irrigated and rainfed conditions at Lleida, Spain) (n = 25)

 
When all the genotypes, growth stages, and environments measured were considered together, a positive linear relationship between SR and LAI was observed (Fig. 1a) . In contrast, the relationship between NDVI and LAI was exponential, with NDVI increasing rapidly, reaching LAI values of about 3 (Fig. 1b). At this point, NDVI tended to reach an asymptote at values between 0.8 and 0.9. Photochemical reflectance index also tended to show an exponential relationship with LAI, with a plateau attained at an LAI of about 3 (Fig. 1c).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Relationship between (a) simple ratio (SR), (b) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and (c) photochemical reflectance index (PRI) as a function of leaf area index (LAI) under rainfed (crosses) and irrigated (circles) conditions. Data from the 25 durum wheat genotypes and the five growth stages are considered together

 
Relationship between Grain Yield and Spectral Reflectance Indices
Within the rainfed environment, yield was positively correlated (P < 0.05) with SR, NDVI, and PRI measured at any of the growth stages studied. Nevertheless, the coefficients of correlation were highest for the spectral reflectance indices measured at anthesis (Fig. 2) . Under irrigation, the coefficients of correlation between grain yield and the spectral reflectance indices increased progressively from booting to maturity, although (except for the PRI) the relationships were significant (P < 0.05) only at maturity (Fig. 2). For the three spectral reflectance indices, significant correlations with grain yield were attained only when these indices were measured at crop stages with LAI < 2.5 (Fig. 3) . Nevertheless, any further addition by means of a multilineal fitting of the PRI mean from anthesis to maturity (as an indicator of the RUE during grain filling) to either SR or NDVI, measured at any crop stage, did not significantly improve the coefficient of the linear correlation between yield and any of the vegetation indices. This lack of improvement in the relationship was also observed when yield was correlated with the mean value from anthesis to maturity of any of these spectral reflectance indices. The progressive addition (from heading to maturity) by means of a multilineal fitting of any of these indices increased the performance of the assessment only from heading to milk-grain stage under rainfed conditions. The coefficients of determination (r2) for the relationships of SR, NDVI, and PRI with yield within this environment were 0.59**, 0.51**, and 0.37, respectively (Fig. 4) . Further addition of the indices measured at maturity did not improve r2. Under irrigation, r2 values of the multilineal fittings were always lower than under rainfed conditions and increased markedly only with the addition of the measurements made at maturity. Thus, values of r2 for the relationship between SR, NDVI, and PRI measured from heading to maturity and yield were 0.28, 0.39, and 0.26, respectively.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Correlation coefficient across genotypes between grain yield and the spectral reflectance indices simple ratio (SR), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and photochemical reflectance index (PRI), as a function of growing degree-days (GDD) for irrigated and rainfed conditions. Levels of significance are indicated in the right-hand margin. B (booting), H (heading), A (anthesis), MG (milk grain), M (physiological maturity)

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Relationship between leaf area index (LAI), from booting to physiological maturity and the coefficient of correlation of the relationships between grain yield and (a) simple ratio (SR), (b) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and (c) photochemical reflectance index (PRI). Each point corresponds to a growth stage either under rainfed (open square) or irrigation (solid circle)

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Percentage of grain yield variation (r2) through the 25 genotypes of durum wheat under irrigated and rainfed conditions, explained by the progressive addition of the spectral reflectance indices: (a) simple ratio (SR), (b) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and (c) photochemical reflectance index (PRI) measured at heading (H), anthesis (A), milk grain (MG), and physiological maturity (M)

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Genotypic variability for growth, grain yield, and the spectroradiometrical indices was measured among the genotypes within both environments. Differences between the irrigated and rainfed environments in growth and spectral reflectance indices, as well as in final grain yield, were found to be due to the different water status of the two environments. The wide range of genotypic and environmental variability under Mediterranean conditions for yield and LAI was properly illustrated in this study, as shown by the extreme differences in values recorded for these traits between environments and genotypes (ICARDA, 1996; Royo et al., 1998). From jointing to maturity, the irrigated trial received 174 mm of water, but the rainfed trial received only 63 mm (Table 1). As for the spectral reflectance-based vegetation indices (NDVI and SR), it has been widely reported that, as a consequence of lower amounts of green biomass, vegetation under stress shows a decrease in reflectance in the near-infrared bands (>750 nm), an increased red reflectance in the chlorophyll active band ({approx}680 nm), and a consequent blue shift on the red edge (Gamon et al., 1992; Peñuelas et al., 1997). Such changes in the spectral signature lead to a decrease in either NDVI and SR. Ontogenetic changes in the spectral vegetation indices also reflect the pattern of changes during the crop cycle in green area (see Table 3). Differences in the PRI were produced by a differential reflectance in the zeaxanthin carotenoid active band (531 nm) (Gamon et al., 1992; Peñuelas et al., 1995), which suggests that the RUE of plants was higher in the irrigated than in the rainfed environment (Filella et al., 1996). Similarly, the reduction that occurred in the two environments in PRI from anthesis to maturity was probably associated with a progressive senescence of photosynthetic organs during grain filling.

The weaker relationships recorded between the spectral reflectance indices and GAI, compared with those for LAI, might have been the result of the difficulties encountered in measuring properly the green area of organs other than leaf laminae (e.g., the spike and the stem). Similarly, problems associated with the particular architecture of these nonlaminar green organs when spectral reflectance indices are measured should not be forgotten. In wheat, the relationship between spectral vegetation indices and canopy parameters has been reported as being disturbed by the presence of the spike (Shibayama et al., 1986).

The exponential pattern of the relationship between NDVI and LAI (Fig. 1b) agrees with that reported previously in bread wheat (Curran, 1983), where an LAI value of {approx}3 for the beginning of the asymptotic region was found. Indeed, the NDVI is a highly sensitive index for crops with LAI between 0 and 2. For crops with LAI > 3, the addition of more canopy layers has little effect on the relative interceptance or reflectance of red and near-infrared radiation, and thus little effect on difference to NDVI (Sellers, 1987). This in itself suggests a potential limitation of the use of NDVI as a crop area indicator, since beyond a certain value of LAI the changes in NDVI with LAI become insignificant (Carlson and Ripley, 1997). The NDVI is ideally suited for detecting subtle differences in cover in sparse canopies, however, and as such constitutes a sensitive growth index either in early crop stages or under stress conditions (Bellairs et al., 1996; Gallo et al., 1985; Peñuelas et al., 1997). Similarly, our results (see the initial part of the relationship in Fig. 1b) with durum wheat indicate that, even under adequate growing conditions, NDVI may also be useful in the later crop stages (i.e., during grain filling), when LAI decreases to values around 2 (Table 3). This observation agrees with that previously reported in bread wheat under Mediterranean conditions by Fernández et al. (1994). Therefore, the pattern of the relationship between NDVI and LAI supports the better performance of NDVI in the rainfed environment than under irrigation when assessing differences in green area and grain yield. In addition, other factors such as the kind of vegetation, developmental stage, and leaf water content may be involved (Paltridge and Barber, 1988).

Among the vegetation indices, SR correlated better with crop growth (measured as total biomass or photosynthetic area) and grain yield than NDVI, specially under rainfed conditions. The linear nature of the relationship between SR and LAI (Fig. 1a) compared with the exponential relationship between NDVI and LAI (Fig. 1b) supports this fact. This linear relationship between SR and LAI has been widely reported (see references in Araus, 1996; Field et al., 1994; Peñuelas, 1998). Nevertheless, under irrigation, the SR values for LAI beyond 2.5 were highly dispersed (Fig. 1a), which is consistent with the absence in this environment of significant correlations between SR and LAI at heading and anthesis (Table 4). At increasing LAI, due to the algebraic definition of each vegetation index, NDVI would tend asymptotically to 1, while SR would tend to infinity. However, due to saturation of the reflectance, vegetation index becomes insensitive at LAI {approx} 3. At higher LAIs, therefore, SR shows large scattering due to the noise of the measurement, while NDVI fluctuates slightly below 1.

Photochemical reflectance index showed an exponential relationship pattern with LAI (Fig. 1c). This may be due to the normalized nature of this index, which has a mathematical formula similar to that of NDVI. The weaker correlations of PRI with grain yield compared with those of SR and NDVI may be explained by the fact that any reduction in the RUE (due to drought and associated stresses or just to plant ontogeny) is generally less significant than that in total biomass or intercepted PAR (Sinclair, 1988). Alternatively, the relationship between PRI and green area, as well as the absence in PRI of any effect independent of that of SR or NDVI to explain differences in yield, suggests that PRI assesses similar characteristics of the crop to those that are assessed by vegetation indices. Thus, for example, during grain filling, the effect of drought and plant ontogeny on senescence will simultaneously affect leaf area duration and the RUE.

In conclusion, our results, based on a wide range of genetic variability, suggest that for durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions, the usefulness of SR and NDVI for predicting green area and grain yield is limited to environments or crop stages in which the LAI values are <3 (Fig. 3). Thus, for example, in the semiarid conditions typical of rainfed Mediterranean environments, a major breeding trait such as the LAI attained at anthesis (Loss and Siddique, 1994) could be assessed by means of these vegetation indices. Indeed, in the rainfed environment, the best correlation between these spectral reflectance indices and yield was attained at anthesis. In the more favorable irrigation environment (with an LAI > 3 for most of the crop cycle), the usefulness of these indices is less evident and restricted to the later stages of the crop. Indeed, our results for the rainfed environment concerning the percentage variability in yield across genotypes explained by the integration of the spectral vegetation indices during the crop cycle agree with previous results in bread wheat (Fig. 4). Thus, Wiegand and Richardson (1990) reported an r2 of 0.50 for the prediction of grain yield from spectral vegetation indices measured at four dates during vegetative growth. Similarly, Rudorff and Batista (1990) reported an r2 of 0.66 between yield and integrated spectral vegetation indices from booting to completely senesced plants. The present study extends to durum wheat the potential validity of spectral vegetation indices in assessing genotypic differences in yield and biomass under Mediterranean conditions, especially for environments with low and medium yield potential.SAS Institute 1987


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was partially funded by CICYT, Spain, under project AGF96-1137-CO2-01, and by INIA, under project SC-97-039-C02-01. Nieves Aparicio and Dolors Villegas were recipients of grants from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (MEC) and the Commissionat per Universitats i Recerca (Generalitat de Catalunya), respectively. The skilled technical assistance of the staff of the Area de Cultius Extensius is gratefully acknowledged.

Received for publication January 4, 1999.
    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. S. Carley, D. L. Jordan, L. C. Dharmasri, T. B. Sutton, R. L. Brandenburg, and M. G. Burton
Peanut Response to Planting Date and Potential of Canopy Reflectance as an Indicator of Pod Maturation
Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 376 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
B. Prasad, B. F. Carver, M. L. Stone, M. A. Babar, W. R. Raun, and A. R. Klatt
Genetic Analysis of Indirect Selection for Winter Wheat Grain Yield Using Spectral Reflectance Indices
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1416 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
B. Prasad, B. F. Carver, M. L. Stone, M. A. Babar, W. R. Raun, and A. R. Klatt
Potential Use of Spectral Reflectance Indices as a Selection Tool for Grain Yield in Winter Wheat under Great Plains Conditions
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1426 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. G. Sullivan and C. C. Holbrook
Using Ground-Based Reflectance Measurements as Selection Criteria for Drought- and Aflatoxin-Resistant Peanut Genotypes
Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1040 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. E. Board, V. Maka, R. Price, D. Knight, and M. E. Baur
Development of Vegetation Indices for Identifying Insect Infestations in Soybean
Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 650 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. A. Babar, M. P. Reynolds, M. van Ginkel, A. R. Klatt, W. R. Raun, and M. L. Stone
Spectral Reflectance to Estimate Genetic Variation for In-Season Biomass, Leaf Chlorophyll, and Canopy Temperature in Wheat
Crop Sci., March 27, 2006; 46(3): 1046 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. A. Babar, M. P. Reynolds, M. van Ginkel, A. R. Klatt, W. R. Raun, and M. L. Stone
Spectral Reflectance Indices as a Potential Indirect Selection Criteria for Wheat Yield under Irrigation
Crop Sci., February 1, 2006; 46(2): 578 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. E. Board and H. Modali
Dry Matter Accumulation Predictors for Optimal Yield in Soybean
Crop Sci., August 1, 2005; 45(5): 1790 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K.-W. Chang, Y. Shen, and J.-C. Lo
Predicting Rice Yield Using Canopy Reflectance Measured at Booting Stage
Agron. J., May 13, 2005; 97(3): 872 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
B. L. Ma, K. D. Subedi, and C. Costa
Comparison of Crop-Based Indicators with Soil Nitrate Test for Corn Nitrogen Requirement
Agron. J., March 1, 2005; 97(2): 462 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
N. Aparicio, D. Villegas, J. L. Araus, J. Casadesus, and C. Royo
Relationship between Growth Traits and Spectral Vegetation Indices in Durum Wheat
Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1547 - 1555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. L. ARAUS, G. A. SLAFER, M. P. REYNOLDS, and C. ROYO
Plant Breeding and Drought in C3 Cereals: What Should We Breed For?
Ann. Bot., June 15, 2002; 89(7): 925 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. F. Shanahan, J. S. Schepers, D. D. Francis, G. E. Varvel, W. W. Wilhelm, J. M. Tringe, M. R. Schlemmer, and D. J. Major
Use of Remote-Sensing Imagery to Estimate Corn Grain Yield
Agron. J., May 1, 2001; 93(3): 583 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (56)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aparicio, N.
Right arrow Articles by Royo, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aparicio, N.
Right arrow Articles by Royo, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Aparicio, N.
Right arrow Articles by Royo, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Crop Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome