Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 91:934-939 (1999)
© 1999 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isse, A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Isse, A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Isse, A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Agricultural Systems
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Ground Water Quality
Agronomy Journal 91:934-939 (1999)
© 1999 American Society of Agronomy

INTEGRATED SOIL AND CROP MANAGEMENT

Cover Crops and Nutrient Retention for Subsequent Sweet Corn Production

A.A. Issea, Angus F. MacKenziea, Katrine Stewarta, Daniel C. Cloutierb and Donald L. Smitha

a Dep. of Plant Sci., Macdonald Campus of McGill Univ., 21,111 Lakeshore Rd., Ste. Anne de Bellevue, QC, H9X 3V9, Canada
b Inst. de Malherbologie, P.O. Box 222. Ste. Anne de Bellevue, QC, Canada

afm{at}nrs.mcgill.ca


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
The use of high rates of N fertilizer in intensive sweet corn (Zea mays L.) production may result in leaching losses and contamination of adjacent waterways and ground water. Cover crops planted after sweet corn harvest could absorb residual soil N and minimize losses of fertilizer in gravitational water. Field experiments were conducted on a Ste. Rosalie heavy clay (fine, mixed, frigid, Typic Humaquept) and a St. Bernard sandy clay loam (fine loamy, mixed, nonacid, frigid Typic Eutrochrept). Cover crop effects on nutrient uptake, subsequent N release, loss of N, P, and K in leaching water, and denitrification rates were measured. Fertilizer N rates were 0, 75, and 150 kg ha-1. Cover crops were red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), forage radish (Raphanus sativus L.), canola (Brassica rapa L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.). A control treatment with no cover crop was also included. Three replicates were used in a split-plot arrangement of a randomized complete block design. Fall residual soil NO-3–N levels were higher in control plots than cover crop plots. Gravitational water NO-3–N was greater in control plots and ranged from 17 to 76 kg N yr-1 N, compared with cover crop plot values of 1 to 55 kg N yr-1. Cover crops had no effect on denitrification rates, or on NH+4–N, P, or K concentrations in gravitational water. Forage radish, canola, and barley were effective cover crops in reducing soil NO-3–N. Cover crop effects on subsequent sweet corn were found only in grain N uptake.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
NUTRIENT LOSS

from the soil during crop production has adverse effects on soil properties and is an economic loss. Ground and surface water contamination can be caused by plant nutrients applied in excess of crop uptake. Nitrogen management goals are to promote N uptake and maximize crop yield while minimizing N losses. Losses of mineral N are a result of immobilization, volatilization of NH3, leaching, and denitrification (Bock, 1984). These last two processes are of concern as potential sources of contaminants of ground and surface waters and of the atmosphere. Sweet corn in eastern Canada may be a problem crop due to high N fertilizer rates.

Growing cover crops after sweet corn harvest may minimize residual soil NO-3–N level and reduce NO-3–N content of gravitational water (Karlen and Doran, 1991; Miller et al., 1992; Brandi-Dohrn et al., 1997). Legumes are difficult to study as they are both a sink and a source of N. Nitrogen supplied by hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) and crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) in cover crop experiments ranged from 72 to 149 kg N ha-1 (Ebelhar et al., 1984; Hargrove, 1986; Holderbaum et al., 1990; Clark et al., 1995; McVay et al., 1989). Nonlegume cover crops have been associated with reducing N leaching loss, but the equivalent fertilizer N retained against leaching is estimated with difficulty. Studies of legume vs. nonlegume cover crops are needed in order to compare their capacity to decrease soil NO-3–N and release N to the subsequent crop.

The denitrification process in agricultural soils is affected by NH+4–N and NO-3–N concentrations (De Klein and van Logtestijn, 1994), water content (Davidson, 1992), available C content (Rolston, 1981), and temperature (Mancino et al., 1988). Incorporation of available C from cover crops can increase denitrification rates (Aulakh et al., 1983). Production of crops such as sweet corn, which have high N rates and early maturity, might benefit from the use of cover crops to absorb excess fertilizer N in the late summer and fall growth. The objectives of the study were to quantify the effect of N fertilizers and cover crop species on subsequent sweet corn yield, N uptake, potential nutrient losses in gravitational water, and denitrification.


    Materials and methods
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
The experiments were conducted at two sites, the Ste. Rosalie site at the Lods Experimental Agronomy Centre and the St. Bernard site at the Horticulture Centre, both on the Macdonald Campus of McGill University (45°25'45'' N, 73°56'00'' W) (Table 1) . Average precipitation is 929 mm yr-1 and mean annual temperature is 6.2°C.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Experimental soil physical and chemical properties at a depth of 0 to 20 cm at two sites in Quebec

 
The experimental design was a randomized complete block using three replicates in a split-plot design, with N rate as the main plot and cover crops as the subplots. Subplot size for both sites was 3 by 3 m. Sweet corn (Zea mays L. cv. Combo Hybrid Bicolor), a 63-d midseason hybrid, was selected as the main crop. Initial soil samples were taken in each replicate for determination of chemical and physical soil properties (Table 1). Sweet corn was seeded at 53000 seeds ha-1 on 25 May 1994, 10 May 1995, and 6 May 1996. Fertilizer N rates were 0, 75, and 150 kg ha-1 as NH4NO3, with 44 kg P ha-1 as triple superphosphate and 125 kg K ha-1 as muriate of potash. Fertilizers were broadcast on 2 June 1994 and 16 May 1995, a few days after sweet corn emergence. No fertilizer was applied to the cover crops and no fertilizer was applied to sweet corn in 1996 in order to determine sweet corn residual nutrient uptake.

Two liters per hectare of Basagran [480 g L-1 bentazon; 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] was applied on 22 June 1994, to control nut sedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) on the Ste. Rosalie site. In April 1995 and June 1996, the Ste. Rosalie plots were sprayed with 5 L ha-1 Roundup [356 g L-1 glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] directed between the rows, 2.8 L ha-1 Hoe-grass 284 {284 g L-1 diclofop-methyl; methyl ester of (±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy]propanoic acid}, 1 L ha-1 Pardner (280 g L-1 bromoxynil; 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile), and 2.25 L ha-1 Basagran Fort (480 g L-1 bentazon). Herbicides were applied post emergence. No herbicides were used in the St. Bernard site. Corn was harvested by hand on 5 Aug. 1994, 24 July 1995, and 20 July 1996; 25 ears were randomly harvested from the central two rows and a five-plant subsample was taken from each plot to assess yield components. Samples were dried at 70°C and ground to pass a 1-mm sieve (18 mesh) prior to analyses.

Experimental areas were cultivated with a tractor-mounted rototiller before seeding cover crops. Six cover crops and a control treatment (no cover crop) were used. Cover crops were seeded on 8 and 10 Sept. 1994 and 5 and 6 Sept. 1995, using a 5-row, 76-cm small-plot forage seeder. Cover crop seeding rates were 12 kg ha-1 for red clover, 22 kg ha-1 for crimson clover, 10 kg ha-1 in 1994 and 20 kg ha-1 in 1995 for forage radish, 10 kg ha-1 for canola, 142 kg ha-1 for barley, and 35 kg ha-1 for annual ryegrass. Forage radish seeding rate was increased to 20 kg ha-1 in 1995, due to low plant populations in 1994.

Harvesting of cover crop biomass was completed on 28 October in 1994 and on 25 October in 1995, using a 53.4- by 53.4-cm quadrat. Due to unusual conditions, the cover crop continued to grow in 1994 after sampling. Ten plants were dug from each plot to estimate root and shoot biomass and NPK concentrations. Plant roots were removed with help of a small shovel, and washed carefully to remove the soil. All plant samples were dried at 70°C and weighed. Plots were plowed after sampling. Treatments were repeated in time in the same plots throughout the study.

Soil NO3 and gravitational water measurements were carried out only on high N rate plots, on forage radish, red clover, ryegrass, and control plots. Samples for NO3–N were obtained before sweet corn seeding in spring and in late fall when cover crop growth ceased. Samples at the Ste. Rosalie site were taken to a depth of 100 cm in 20-cm increments; samples at the St. Bernard site were taken to a depth of 60 cm in 20-cm increments.

Zero-tension lysimeters were installed to collect gravitational water in November and removed in early May. Sampling cylinders (6.0 cm i.d. by 90 cm) with one closed end and three holes (0.3 cm diam.) were installed in the selected treatment plots, with three replicates, after sweet corn harvest for both sites in 1994 and 1995. Cylinders were pushed into the soil to 55 cm below the soil surface after removing soil with hydraulically inserted sampling tubes of the same diameter. The open end of the cylinder was covered with a glass jar to prevent precipitation entry and evaporation. Soil water at zero tension could enter but not leave the cylinder. Soil solution samples were collected periodically whenever water was found from the cylinder with a rubber hose connected to a 60-mL syringe. Both rubber hose and syringe were washed with distilled water after each sample and rinsed with the next sample to minimize contamination. At each sampling, approximately 70 mL of soil solution was collected from each cylinder for determination of NO-3–N, NH+4–N, P, and K on 28 Mar. 1995, 22 Jan. 1996, 2 May 1996, and 8 May 1996.

Denitrification measurements were made during the corn growing season using the technique of Aulakh et al. (1983). Soil cores (2.5 cm i.d. by 15 cm) were collected from the 0- to 15-cm depth from forage radish, red clover, ryegrass, and control plots and were incubated in 2-L bottles at ambient temperatures. The concentration of N2O was determined on gas samples from incubated soil by gas chromatography.

Soil samples were extracted using the Mehlich 3 procedure (Tran and Simard, 1993); P and K were determined with an automated analyzer. Organic matter analyses used the Walkley–Black procedure (Nelson and Sommers, 1982). Soil particle size distribution was measured by hydrometer (McKeague, 1976, p. 16–26).

The mineral N lost from the profile during the fall and winter of 1994–1995 and 1995–1996 was calculated using changes in soil NO3 and estimated leaching losses from gravitational water assuming leaching losses of 215 to 236 mm of excess water (Zhang and MacKenzie, 1997). Ammonium and NO-3–N were extracted from approximately 10 to 15 g of soil from each depth by shaking in 100 mL of 1 M KCl for 1 h. Suspensions were filtered and filtrates analyzed colorimetrically (Keeney and Nelson, 1982). Plant total N, P, and K were determined by digesting 0.250 g of oven-dry plant tissue using H2SO4 and H2O2 and determining N and P colorimetrically and K by flame photometry (Thomas et al., 1967).

Statistical analyses were conducted using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and General Linear Model (GLM) procedures of Windows SAS Version 6.11 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Comparisons among treatments were made using orthogonal contrasts. Polynomial trend comparisons were used to examine N treatment effects.


    Results
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Sweet Corn Dry Matter Production and Grain N Uptake
The effect of N and cover crop treatments on sweet corn was limited to grain N contents (Table 2) . Cover crops did not affect sweet corn dry matter production (data not shown). Block effects were found at one location year due to variation in site properties.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Sweet corn yield at 150 kg N ha-1 and N uptake at two sites in Quebec in 1995 and 1996

 
In 1995, treatment residual effects on grain N were found (Table 2) at the St. Bernard site where forage radish and ryegrass plots had a higher N contribution than red clover to subsequent sweet corn grain N and with control plots lower than the cover crop plots. In 1996, no residual treatment effects on sweet corn grain and stover N were noted at either site.

Cover Crop Dry Matter Production
Cover crop root and shoot yields varied with species, except for the Ste. Rosalie shoot biomass in 1994 (Table 3) . Shoot biomass at the St. Bernard site in 1994 was highest from barley and ryegrass, followed by forage radish, canola, and red and crimson clover. Estimated root biomass in 1994 was highest for ryegrass at both sites. In 1995, shoot biomass ranged from 255 to 3120 kg ha-1. Cover crop species effects were similar across both sites. Forage radish produced the highest shoot and root biomass; red clover produced the lowest aboveground biomass.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Root and shoot biomass of six cover crops at two sites in Quebec in November, 1994 and 1995

 
Fertilizer N for sweet corn subsequently increased only cover crop shoot biomass at the St. Bernard site in 1994, and the effect of added N was linear (Table 3). At the Ste. Rosalie site, no significant trend comparisons at the three N rates were found (data not shown).

Cover Crop N Uptake
Cover crop N uptake paralleled dry matter production at both sites for both years. There was no effect of N fertilizer in either year at either site (Table 4) . Root and shoot N uptake was affected by cover crop species excepted for shoot N in 1994 at the Ste. Rosalie site. At the St. Bernard site, shoot N uptake was higher with barley, ryegrass, forage radish, and canola and lower with crimson and red clover. In 1995, forage radish had the highest total shoot and root N at both sites, followed by canola at the Ste. Rosalie site, and canola and barley shoot values at the St. Bernard site.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Root and shoot N uptake of six cover crops at two sites in Quebec in November, 1994 and 1995

 
Soil Nitrate Levels in Sweet Corn Plots as Influenced by Cover Crops
Soil NO-3–N levels were influenced by the time of the year and cover crops in both sites (Table 5) . Cover crop plots had higher NO-3–N than control plots at both sites in May 1995, while in November 1995 the control plots had higher NO-3–N levels than cover crop plots at both sites. Decreases in NO-3–N levels over winter were greater for control plots than cover crop plots at both sites. During the winter of 1994–1995, cover crop plots increased in NO-3–N levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5 Extractable soil nitrate as influenced by six cover crops at two sites in Quebec

 
Leaching Water N, P, and K Contents
At both sites and both years, control plots had higher mean NO3–N levels in gravitational water than cover crop plots, with higher values at the St. Bernard site (Table 6) . Assuming 215 to 236 mm of percolating water per year, control plots at the Ste. Rosalie site lost about 30 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and cover crop plots from 1.2 to 27 kg N ha-1 yr-1 over the winters of 1994–1995 and 1995–1996. At the St. Bernard site, control plot maximum possible N losses were 64 to 76 kg N ha-1 yr-1 and cover crop maximum losses were 30 to 55 kg N ha-1 yr-1. Among cover crops, red clover plots had the highest gravitational NO-3–N levels, followed by ryegrass and forage radish.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6 Gravitational water nitrate content (GWNC) at two sites in Quebec as affected by cover crops

 
There were no treatment effects on NH4 or P concentrations in soil gravitational water (data not shown). Values of NH+4–N ranged from 0.3 to 2.4 mg L-1 N at the Ste. Rosalie site, and from 0.4 to 5 mg L-1 N at the St. Bernard site. Maximum losses were estimated at 6 to 12 kg N ha-1 yr-1. Values of P ranged from 0.3 to 7.7 mg L-1 P at the Ste. Rosalie site, and from 0.075 to 5.0 mg L-1 P at the St. Bernard site. Maximum losses were estimated at 12 to 18 kg ha-1 P yr-1. At both sites, there were no effects of cover crops on K content of gravitational water, with one exception: on 22 Jan. 1996, control plots at the St. Bernard site had higher K than did the cover crop plots. Values of K ranged from 1 to 15 mg L-1 K at the Ste. Rosalie site, and from 1 to 27 mg L-1 K at the St. Bernard site. Maximum estimated losses per year would be 35 kg ha-1 K at the Ste. Rosalie site and up to 64 kg ha-1 K at the St. Bernard site.

Denitrification Values
Denitrification was not influenced by cover crops at either site, at any sampling date (data not shown). Seasonal variations were noted, and values ranged from lows in October of 0 to 21 g ha-1 N d-1 to highs in June of 8 to 95 g ha-1 N d-1.


    Discussion
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Cover crops had the capacity to deplete soil NO-3–N in the fall relative to the control treatment. Gravitational soil solution NO-3–N concentrations are within the range found by Brandi-Dohrn et al. (1997). With cover crops, values of soil solution NO-3–N did not always fall below 10 mg L-1. However, the improvement in soil NO-3–N levels with cover crops was significant. Cover crop plots increased in NO-3–N through net mineralization and nitrification during this period, but this higher soil mineral N value in the spring was not reflected in higher corn yields. Values are within the range of equivalent N fertilizer found by Ebelhar et al. (1984), Hargrove (1986), McVay et al. (1989), Holderbaum et al. (1990), and Clark et al. (1995). Cover crop contribution to subsequent sweet corn was found to a limited extent in grain N uptake. This supports the Hargrove (1986) observation that grain N content seemed to be a better parameter to estimate cover crop contribution to subsequent corn. This lack of yield response indicated that 40 to 60 kg ha-1 of NO3–N in plots with cover crops was sufficient N for sweet corn growth. However, in situations where the background N levels are low, yield increases with cover crops could be found (Holderbaum et al., 1990). In general, cover crops had no negative effect on sweet corn growth and yield.

Both methods for estimating NO-3–N leaching losses showed similar overall trends between soils. Estimated losses of NO-3–N were higher at the St. Bernard site than Ste. Rosalie site using either method. This could be due to reduced movement of NO-3–N over the winter due to a higher clay content in Ste. Rosalie soil than in St. Bernard soil, or due to rapid surface water movement down fissures in the high-clay Ste. Rosalie soil, reducing N levels in the leaching water.

Differences in estimates of NO-3–N loss between methods varied with the year. In the winter of 1994–1995, at the Ste. Rosalie site, losses of NO-3–N calculated by each method were similar for control plots, but at St. Bernard, soil losses estimated using the soil gravitational solution method were higher than when using the sequential soil core sample method. In both soils, losses during winter 1995–1996 calculated from soil solution were less than those obtained from the sequential soil core sample method. This difference could be due to rapid surface preferential flow of water through soil macropores or fissures diluting gravitational soil solution NO-3–N levels (Francis et al., 1994). Amount and distribution of over-winter precipitation was similar for both years, at 396 and 386 mm (November to March, inclusive), and was probably not a major cause of difference between years. Francis et al. (1994) stated that the sequential soil core sample method could overestimate losses if denitrification was significant during the fall to spring period. However, our denitrification rates were low in this period. Thus, denitrification is not considered to have been a significant component of the N cycle in the fall to spring time of the year.

In 1994, species differences were not pronounced, due to low dry matter production. In 1995, when the cover crop dry matter yields were higher, species effects were large. Barley, forage radish, and canola generally produced the highest shoot and root dry matter at both sites.

Root uptake N tended to parallel shoot N uptake but was only 10 to 20% of the total N uptake. Our results support previous observations of percentage of N contained in the cover crop shoots. Jensen et al. (1944) and Mitchell and Teel (1977) reported that more than 80% of the N in several forage species was contained in the shoots. Touchton et al. (1982) concluded that no more than 30% of N can be expected in the root system.

Losses of NH+4–N, P, and K were not affected by cover crop, due to their low mobility in soils or retention on cation exchange complexes. With adequate cation exchange capacity in these soils, cations such as NH+4–N and K+ would remain largely adsorbed. Phosphorus was largely immobile, due to fixation in the soils.

The highest denitrification values occurred during growth of the sweet corn, because residual N levels in the soil were high (De Klein and van Logtestijin, 1994) and temperature was high (Mancino et al., 1988) compared with the period of cover crop growth, when the temperature was low. The hypothesis that denitrification would be increased with cover crop (Aulakh et al., 1983) use was not supported, and cover crops following sweet corn had no apparent effect on denitrification.

Criteria for cover crop selection should include ease of establishment, effective absorption of excess fertilizer N, reduction of nutrient loss by leaching, and subsequent release of N for growth of a following crop. Under these criteria, establishment was most successful with forage radish, barley, and canola. In contrast, legumes and ryegrass resulted in disappointing stands and their effectiveness was limited under the short-term period of growth used in the experiment. Cover crops achieved the objectives of reducing potential fall leaching and ensuring adequate soil N levels the following spring.Jensen Frith 1944


    NOTES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Funded by Auxiliary Canada–Quebec Entente, Contract Research Program.

Received for publication June 11, 1998.
    REFERENCES
 TOP
 NOTES
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
J. E. Dean and R. R. Weil
Brassica Cover Crops for Nitrogen Retention in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain
J. Environ. Qual., February 6, 2009; 38(2): 520 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Liu, B. L. Ma, and A. A. Bomke
Effects of Cover Crops on Soil Aggregate Stability, Total Organic Carbon, and Polysaccharides
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 27, 2005; 69(6): 2041 - 2048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isse, A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Isse, A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Isse, A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Agricultural Systems
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Ground Water Quality


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome