Published in Agron J 100:352-360 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agrojnl2007.0060
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
WHEAT
Changes in Yield and Carbon Isotope Discrimination of Italian and Spanish Durum Wheat during the 20th Century
C. Royoa,*,
V. Martosb,
A. Ramdania,
D. Villegasa,
Y. Rharrabtib and
L. F. García del Moralb
a IRTA, Durum Wheat Breeding, Centre UdL-IRTA, Rovira Roure, 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain
b Dep. de Fisología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Biotecnología, Univ. de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
* Corresponding author (conxita.royo{at}irta.es).
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
This study evaluates the breeding of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) during the 20th century with respect to yield and grain carbon isotope discrimination (
), and their relationship with plant height, harvest index (HI), days from sowing to anthesis, and days from anthesis to maturity. Twenty-four cultivars released before 1945 (old), between 1950 and 1985 (intermediate), and between 1988 and 2000 (modern), and previously characterized by whether dwarfing genes were present (semidwarf) or absent (tall), were selected from germplasm obtained in Italy and Spain. Experiments were conducted in six environments with average yields ranging from to 2113 to 4827 kg ha–1. The total absolute genetic gain in yield across countries from before 1945 to 2000 was 20 kg ha–1 yr–1 (51% of increase), which represents a relative genetic gain of 0.61% yr–1. Yield gains led to a loss of stability. The mean increase in
13C was 6% (0.014
yr–1 or 0.09% yr–1). Early heading and a long grain-filling period were correlated with high yields in the tall cultivars. Increased plant height and low
13C values were associated with high yields for the semidwarf cultivars, while a long grain-filling period was not advantageous for semidwarf cultivars.
Abbreviations:
13C, grain carbon isotope discrimination CIMMYT, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center HI, harvest index PDB, Pee Dee belemnite
 |
NOTES
|
|---|
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Received for publication February 12, 2007.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
AN UNDERSTANDING OF CHANGES in yield and associated traits is critical for improving the knowledge of yield-limiting factors and designing future breeding strategies. Breeding activities during the second half of the 20th century allowed the release of cultivars that responded well to new agronomic practices. For example, the introduction of dwarfing genes increased N utilization without lodging, resulting in high yields. However, Boyer (1982) has pointed out that only part of the genetic potential for yield has been realized, due partially to the poor understanding of the essential mechanisms of adaptation of the plants to unfavorable environments.
Many studies have sought to evaluate the advances made by breeding in bread wheat (T. aestivum L.) and other cereals (Austin et al., 1980; Cox et al., 1988, Perry and D'Antuono, 1989; Brancourt-Hulmel et al., 2003; Shearman et al., 2005), but durum wheat has been analyzed in only a few studies. Although Italy and Spain are the main durum wheat producers in the Mediterranean basin (Royo, 2005), information on the changes in yield and related traits attributed to breeding activities in the region is scarce. In Canada, McCaig and Clarke (1995) reported yield increases of 0.81% yr–1 from 1960 to date, while the genetic gain in durum wheat yield among CIMMYT germplasm between 1960 and 1984 is 3% yr–1 (Waddington et al., 1987). Past genetic gains in yield have been associated largely with decreased plant height (Berger and Planchon, 1990) combined with increased HI and grains per m2 in bread wheat (Austin et al., 1989; Reynolds et al., 1999) as well as in durum wheat (De Vita et al., 2007; Royo et al., 2007).
Carbon isotope discrimination (
13C) is a measure of the 13C to 12C ratio in plant material compared to the same ratio in the atmosphere (Farquhar and Richards, 1984). It has been used to estimate transpiration efficiency or intrinsic water use efficiency (WUE, the ratio of biomass accumulated to water transpired) of the crop, since the isotope signature is based on the integration of plant–water status over a period of time (Condon et al., 1993). When measured in plant dry matter, carbon isotope discrimination integrates transpiration efficiency, the ratio of net photosynthesis (biomass production) to water transpired, over the period during which the dry matter is assimilated (Araus et al., 2003a). Selection of low
13C of leaf–lamina samples collected at the beginning of the stem elongation of wheat has been recommended for yield increases in environments where crop growth depends strongly on subsoil moisture stored from out-of-season rains (Condon et al., 2002; Rebetzke et al., 2002). Carbon isotope discrimination determined in seedling leaves has been used successfully to release Drysdale, a new bread wheat cultivar with improved transpiration efficiency, by the CSIRO Plant Industry (http://www.csiro.au/files/files/p2hh.pdf; verified 29 Dec. 2007) in Australia (Condon et al., 2002; Rebetzke et al., 2002).
A different approach is used when
13C is assessed in mature grains since positive associations between yield and
13C of grains have been reported previously for different cereal species growing under favorable environments (Condon et al., 1987; Richards, 1996; Araus et al., 1998) and from moderate water-stressed to fully irrigated Mediterranean conditions (Villegas et al., 2000; Richards et al., 2002; Royo et al., 2002; Araus et al., 2003a). Several reports on durum wheat (Villegas et al., 2000; Royo et al., 2002; Araus et al., 2003b) have highlighted the usefulness of
13C assessed on mature grains for durum wheat selection under Mediterranean conditions. Phenological differences among genotypes may affect yield and also
13C, especially in drought-prone environments.
This study analyzes the changes in yield and
13C in mature grains attributed to breeding during the 20th century in Italy and Spain. Plant height, HI, and season length were also included in the analysis because of their strong relationship with yield and
13C. The effect of the presence of dwarfing genes on these traits and their relationships was also investigated.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Six field experiments (hereafter referred to as environments) were performed in two different temperature regimes in Spain (Gimenells and Foradada in the Ebro Valley in the north, and Chimeneas in eastern Andalusia in the south). Sites were chosen to represent contrasting environmental conditions within Spain. The southern area has a Mediterranean climate, with mild winters and hot, dry summers. The northern area has a more continental climate, with lower temperatures in winter and spring (Table 1
). Each experiment consisted of a randomized complete block design with three replications and plots of 6 m2 (eight rows 0.15 m apart and 5 m length). Experimental details are given in Table 1. The three experiments located in the south and the one in Foradada in 2002 in the north were conducted under rainfed conditions. Experiments at Gimenells in 2001 and 2002 had supplementary irrigation.
Twenty-four durum wheat cultivars, 12 Italian and 12 Spanish, were selected to represent the germplasm grown in Italy and Spain during the 20th century. Based on the year of release, the cultivars were assigned to three periods, namely old (released before 1945), intermediate (released between 1950 and 1985), and modern (released from 1988 to 2000). The presence of dwarfing genes on this germplasm was tested in a previous study (Royo et al., 2007). Based on this study cultivars were classified as semidwarf (dwarfing genes present) or tall (dwarfing genes absent) (Table 2
).
The number of days from sowing to anthesis and to physiological maturity were recorded in each plot when 50% of the plants reached the stages 65 and 87 in the Zadoks scale (Zadoks et al., 1974). Harvest index was determined on a dry weight basis as the ratio between grain and plant weights of the plants contained in a 1-m-long section of the central row of each plot at ripening (stage 92 of the Zadoks scale). Plant height was measured from the soil to the top of the main spike excluding the awns on 10 randomly sampled plants per plot. Plots were mechanically harvested at ripening and grain yield was adjusted to 120 g kg–1 moisture level. A sample of about 2 g of matured kernels from each plot was finely ground (to pass a 0.5-mm sieve) for carbon isotope analysis. The 13C to 12C ratios were determined by mass spectrometry at Isotope Services Inc., Los Alamos, NM. Stable carbon isotope composition was expressed as
13C values (Farquhar et al., 1989a), where
13C (
) = [(Rgrain/Rstandard)-1] x 1000, and R was the 13C to 12C ratio. Secondary standards of graphite, sucrose, and polyethylene foil calibrated against Pee Dee belemnite (PDB) carbonate were used for comparison. The accuracy of the
13C measurements was ±0.1
. Carbon isotope discrimination was further computed as
13C = (
a–
s)/(1+
s), where
a and
s refer to
13C of air and plant, respectively (Farquhar et al., 1989b). On the PDB scale, free atmospheric CO2 has a current deviation,
a, of approximately –8
(Farquhar et al., 1989a).
Combined ANOVA over latitudes, environments, countries, periods, and cultivars were performed with the SAS–STAT package (SAS Institute, 2000). Means were compared by Duncan's test at P = 0.05. Absolute and relative genetic gains—that is changes due exclusively to plant breeding—were computed for yield and
13C as the slope of the linear regression between the absolute or relative value of the trait and the year of cultivar release. Relative values were computed for each cultivar as a percentage of the average value of all the cultivars for a given country. Genetic correlations were calculated for tall and semidwarf cultivars separately. Correlations were estimated from the genetic variances and covariances, following the method described by Hanson et al. (1956), as follows:
where
p1p2 is the genetic covariance component for two traits, and
p12 and
p22 are the respective genetic variance components.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Changes in Yield and
13C
The ANOVA showed important environmental effects on both yield and
13C (Table 3
), which were higher in the north than in the south (Table 4
). The environmental means for yield ranged between 2879 kg ha–1 (Foradada in 2002) and 4827 kg ha–1 (Gimenells in 2001) in the north, and between 2113 kg ha–1 (in 2001) and 3130 kg ha–1 (in 2002) in the south. The environments with the minimum (15.52
) and maximum (16.78
) values for
13C coincided with those in which the minimum and maximum yields were registered in the north. In the south,
13C means were 14.5, 15.2, and 16.1
, while mean yields were 2228, 2113, and 3130 kg ha–1 in 2000, 2001, and 2002, respectively. The Italian and Spanish cultivars had similar average yields, but the former had slightly higher mean
13C values. Italian genotypes outyielded Spanish ones in the north, while the opposite was true in the south. Italian cultivars showed more
13C variation (from 15.0 for Balilla Falso to 16.4 for Zenit and Flavio) than Spanish cultivars (Table 5
). Old Spanish cultivars were much more uniform in
13C than were the intermediate and modern ones.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 3. Mean squares of the combined analyses of variance for grain yield, carbon isotope discrimination ( 13C), harvest index (HI), plant height (PH), days from sowing to anthesis (DSA), and days from anthesis to maturity (DAM) for 24 durum wheat cultivars (Cv) released in Italy and Spain in three periods and grown on three environments (Env) at each of two latitudes (Lat).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 4. Mean values of grain yield, carbon isotope discrimination ( 13C), harvest index (HI), plant height (PH), days from sowing to anthesis (DSA) and days from anthesis to maturity (DAM) for the set of 24 durum wheat cultivars. Figures in parenthesis indicate the percentage of change from old to modern cultivars. Means for each trait within latitudes, countries and periods followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 5. Mean values across environments of grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination ( 13C), harvest index (HI), plant height (PH), days from sowing to anthesis (DSA), and days from anthesis to maturity (DAM) for each durum wheat cultivar. Data are means of six environments.
|
|
Yield and
13C were significantly higher in intermediate and modern cultivars than in the old cultivars (Table 4). Yield and
13C gains of modern cultivars compared with the old ones were 51 and 5.9%, respectively (Table 4). The absolute yield gain per year was 16.9 kg ha–1 in Italy and 23.6 kg ha–1 in Spain (Fig. 1
). In relative terms these gains were 0.51% yr–1 in Italy and 0.72% yr–1 in Spain. Changes in
13C were 0.016
yr–1 (equivalent to 0.10% yr–1) in Italy and 0.012
yr–1 (equivalent 0.08% yr–1) in Spain. Mean values calculated separately for cultivars carrying or not carrying dwarfing genes showed that semidwarf cultivars had 38.4% higher yield and 4.6% higher
13C than taller cultivars (Table 6
).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Absolute changes in (a) grain yield and (b) grain carbon isotope discrimination of 12 Italian and 12 Spanish durum wheat cultivars released during the 20th century. Each point was obtained by averaging data of six environments and three blocks per environment. Solid dots indicate overlapping of two points.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 6. Mean values of grain yield, carbon isotope discrimination ( 13C), harvest index (HI), plant height (PH), days from sowing to anthesis (DSA) and days from anthesis to maturity (DAM) for the durum wheat cultivars with or without dwarfing genes.
|
|
A significant positive association was found between yield and
13C when the data from all genotypes were pooled (R2 = 0.65, P > 0.001). However, the correlation tended to be positive for the old and intermediate cultivars, but negative for the modern set (Fig. 2
). Phenotypic stability was assessed for yield and
13C. The slope of the linear regression, fitted to the relationship between cultivar yield in each experiment on the experiment mean yield, was used as a measure of yield stability according to Finlay and Wilkinson (1963). The relationship between the slopes of these regressions and the cultivar mean across environments is shown in Fig. 3
. The horizontal line in Fig. 3a separates input responsive cultivars adapted to favorable environments (slope >1) and cultivars with the highest stability (slope <1). The slope values for yield ranged from 0.32 (Senatore Cappelli) to 1.70 (Astigi). All the tall cultivars except Capeiti were located in the bottom left part of Fig. 3a, corresponding to the region of low yield but high stability. Astigi, Boabdil, and Simeto were the most input-responsive cultivars. The slopes of the regression analysis for
13C varied less than slopes for yield [0.62 (Capeiti 8)–1.34 (Ariesol)] (Fig. 3b).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Relationship between carbon isotope discrimination of kernels and grain yield for durum wheat cultivars released in Italy and Spain in three periods during the 20th century: (solid circle) old, (plus sign) intermediate, and (circle) modern. Each point was obtained by averaging data of six environments and three blocks per environment. The arrow indicates two overlapped dots.
|
|
The increase in the slope values for yield with the year of release (Fig. 4a
) indicates that selection enhanced the potential for genotypes to respond to more productive environments. The slopes of the Italian cultivars increased significantly at a rate of 1.12% yr–1, while this increase was 1.39% yr–1 for the Spanish cultivars (Fig. 4a). For
13C, the slopes increased at a rate of 0.6% yr–1 for the Italian germplasm and the slopes remained constant for Spanish cultivars (Fig. 4b).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Absolute changes in the slopes of the joint regressions over the year of release of 12 Italian (circle) and 12 Spanish (plus sign) durum wheat cultivars released during the 20th century. The dotted line corresponds to Spanish cultivars.
|
|
Changes in Harvest Index, Plant Height, and Phenology
Harvest index was higher in the south and increased significantly over time in both the Italian and Spanish cultivars (Tables 3 and 4). Among the old cultivars, the Italian cultivars had greater HI than did the Spanish cultivars, and the opposite was true for the modern genotypes. Genetic variability for HI existed for all sets of cultivars (Table 5). A 36% reduction in plant height occurred between old and modern genotypes (Table 4). Plants were taller in experiments conducted in northern environments than in southern ones.
The largest changes in phenological stages occurred between old and intermediate cultivars in both countries (Table 4). The period from sowing to anthesis was longer in the Spanish cultivars than the Italian ones, but the latter had a longer grain-filling period. The period to anthesis decreased in modern Spanish cultivars and was shortest in the intermediate group of Italian cultivars. The longest grain-filling period was recorded on intermediate Italian cultivars. However, grain filling lasted 1 and 3 d more in modern Italian and Spanish cultivars, respectively, than in the old ones. All old Spanish cultivars had a similar grain-filling duration (Table 5). Semidwarf cultivars were 33% shorter, had a higher HI, flowered earlier, and had a longer grain-filling period than the tall ones (Table 6).
Genetic Correlations
The relationship between traits due to pleiotropy or linkage was assessed for tall and semidwarf cultivars separately by means of genetic correlations (Table 7
). A strong relationship was found between yield and
13C in both sets of cultivars, but it was positive for tall cultivars and negative for semidwarf cultivars. The opposite was true for the genetic correlation between yield and plant height, with semidwarf cultivars having a positive relationship and tall cultivars having a negative relationship. Yield was negatively associated with the number of days to anthesis in both tall and semidwarf cultivars, but a very strong and positive relationship was found between yield and grain-filling duration in tall genotypes.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 7. Genetic correlations between grain yield, carbon isotope discrimination ( 13C), harvest index (HI), plant height (PH), days from sowing to anthesis (DSA) and days from anthesis to maturity (DAM) for the set of 24 durum wheat cultivars. Data above the diagonal correspond to cultivars without dwarfing genes (tall) and below the diagonal to cultivars with dwarfing genes (semidwarf, shaded data).
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Environmental Effects
The latitude effect explained most of the variability of the traits studied. Lower temperatures in the north, compared with the south, may have been partially responsible for the longer season length and the greater plant height,
13C values and yields obtained in the northern experiments. A previous study demonstrated that differences in the temperature regimes between the north and the south of Spain accounted for greater durum wheat yields obtained in northern environments (García del Moral et al., 2003). Higher HI obtained in the south may be associated with the shorter plants that were probably the result of warmer temperatures and water stress compared with the north.
Genetic Improvement of Yield and Associated Traits
The total absolute genetic gain in grain yield throughout the two Mediterranean countries was 20 kg ha–1 yr–1 (51% of increase), which amounts to a relative genetic gain of 0.61% yr–1. These values are similar to the genetic yield gain of 19.9 kg ha–1 yr–1 recently reported for durum wheat in Italy (De Vita et al., 2007), and values of 0.4 to 0.6% yr–1 reported for bread wheat (Deckerd et al., 1985; Austin et al., 1989; Perry and D'Antuono, 1989; Canevara et al., 1994). However, evaluations of genetic gains by the durum wheat breeding program of International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) reached much higher values. Pfeiffer et al. (1996) found that the gain in yield increase in durum wheat between 1967 and 1994 was 1.7% yr–1 and a yield increase of almost 3% yr–1 over the 1960 to 1984 period was reported by Waddington et al. (1987). Differences between our results and those reported by CIMMYT may be partially due to the testing environments. Yield improvements at CIMMYT were achieved under optimal environments (Worland and Snape, 2001), while our experiments were conducted in Mediterranean environments with moderate stress. The differences in yield improvements may also reflect the impact of a substantial breeding investment at international centers compared to national programs.
Of the 51% of total yield increase during the period under study, 36% was gained from old to intermediate cultivars and only 15% from intermediate to modern ones. This result suggests that recent genetic gains have been more difficult to achieve than they were in the past, when the introduction of dwarfing genes dramatically raised the yield potential (Rajaram, 2001; Reynolds et al., 1996; Donmez et al., 2001). However, this effect was much more noticeable in the Italian cultivars than in the Spanish cultivars. The yield increase between old and intermediate cultivars was 32% in Italy and 41% in Spain, whereas from intermediate to modern cultivars the increase was much lower, but still higher in Spain (4 and 17% in Italy and Spain, respectively).
The stability analysis for yield showed that the ability of durum wheat cultivars to respond to favorable environments (determined through the slopes of the joint regression models), increased significantly over time. Modern cultivars were better adapted to productive environments, but they lost yield stability. This loss of yield stability over time was more pronounced among Spanish than Italian cultivars (Fig. 4a).
Changes in
13C of mature grains through time, despite being lower than 6% in both countries, could be a consequence of a greater contribution to grain filling of nonstructural carbohydrates accumulated before anthesis in modern cultivars when compared with the old ones. Unpublished results of our group, with the same set of cultivars used in this study, indicate that the translocation of assimilates accumulated in preanthesis accounted for 25, 27, and 33% of grain weight in old, intermediate, and modern cultivars, respectively.
The results demonstrated that high HI and short duration to anthesis were favorable traits for achieving high yields under Mediterranean conditions. Though they attained similar yields, Italian and Spanish cultivars differed significantly in other traits. The greatest differences in HI and season length between Italian and Spanish germplasm arose from old cultivars, which in Italy probably resulted from breeding programs started at the beginning of the 20th century (Maliani, 1979). By contrast, the limited tradition of durum wheat breeding in Spain before 1970 led to a reliance on foreign germplasm. The substantial increase in yield observed in the Spanish cultivars released in the intermediate period compared to the old one was a direct consequence of the introduction of semidwarf cultivars developed at CIMMYT during the 1970s.
The results indicate that durum wheat yield improvements in Spain and Italy have been associated with a decrease in the number of days from sowing to anthesis and a slight increase in the grain-filling duration. However, the total season length remained unaltered, as has been pointed out for Italian durum wheat by Pecetti and Annicchiarico (1998). Earliness in reaching anthesis of modern cultivars allowed them to avoid unfavorable conditions during the most sensitive phases of kernel growth (Royo et al., 2006). The introduction of dwarfing genes accounted for a large part of the yield increases. This was probably due to the pleiotropic effect of dwarfing genes on plant traits affecting yield formation, such as biomass partitioning to the growing spikes (Youssefian et al., 1992; Borner et al., 1993).
Effect of Dwarfing Genes on Phenology, Harvest Index, Yield, and
13C
When all cultivars were considered together, and within the group of tall cultivars, a strong positive association between yield and
13C was observed (Fig. 2). It has been suggested that positive relationships between
13C and yield are attained when cereals are grown under favorable conditions, while negative relationships have been found in very poor environments (Araus et al., 2002). Moreover, a positive relationship between
13C and yield may appear when the differential ability of the genotypes for taking up available water is the main determinant of yield gaps (Richards, 1996) or when constitutive or stress-adaptive traits allow the crop to escape or resist drought stress (Araus et al., 2002). This latter case seems to apply to tall cultivars in which the early heading were the most productive. A long grain-filling duration was a positive trait in tall cultivars, since it led to high HI and yield. The negative associations between plant height and yield, HI and
13C indicate that, among the tall cultivars, the tallest ones had the lowest
13C values and the lowest productivity.
The scenario differed sharply for the modern group of cultivars in which negative and significant phenotypic (r = –0.89, P < 0.001) and genetic (rg = –0.99, P < 0.001) correlations between yield and
13C were found. This indicates that cultivars with high yield had low
13C. Negative relationships between yield and
13C in young leaves have been extensively reported in the literature for environments in which the water available is exhausted during the crop cycle (Condon et al., 2002; Richards et al., 2002). Our study demonstrated that within the semidwarf group of cultivars the most productive were the tallest, earliest to anthesis, with low
13C values and with superior HI.
 |
CONCLUSIONS
|
|---|
Grain yield, plant height, and HI were the traits most affected by durum wheat breeding in Italy and Spain during the 20th century, while
13C and season length were slightly modified. The incorporation of dwarfing genes led to greater yields due to the response of improved cultivars to favorable environments. High HI and early flowering are traits associated with high durum wheat yield under Mediterranean conditions. The change in the trend of the relationship between yield and
13C in modern cultivars, when compared with the old and intermediate, may indicate that differences may exist between these groups regarding their ability for taking up available water, but this assumption needs further investigation.
Early heading and a long grain-filling period were positively correlated with yield within tall cultivars, while increased plant height was a negative trait. Among the semidwarf cultivars, low
13C conferred an adaptive advantage that resulted in greater yields. However, unlike plant height, a long grain-filling period was not advantageous among the semidwarf cultivars.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
The present research was partially funded by Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (CICYT), under projects AGL-2002-04285 and AGL-2006-09226. The skilled technical assistance of the Cereal Breeding staff at Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA) in Lleida, Spain, is gratefully acknowledged.
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Araus, J.L., T. Amaro, J. Casadesús, A. Asbati, and M.M. Nachit. 1998. Relationships between ash content, carbon isotope discrimination and yield in durum wheat. Aust. J. Plant Physiol.
25
:835–842.[Web of Science]
- Araus, J.L., G.A. Slafer, M.P. Reynolds, and C. Royo. 2002. Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: What should we breed for? Ann. Bot.
(London) 89
:925–940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Araus, J.L., G.A. Slafer, M.P. Reynolds, and C. Royo. 2003a. Physiology of yield and adaptation in wheat and barley breeding. p. 1–49. In H.T. Nguyen and A. Blum (ed.) Physiology and biotechnology integration for plant breeding. Marcel Dekker, New York.
- Araus, J.L., D. Villegas, N. Aparicio, L.F. García del Moral, S. El Hani, Y. Rharrabti, J.P. Ferrio, and C. Royo. 2003b. Environmental factors determining carbon isotope discrimination and yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Crop Sci.
43
:170–180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Austin, R.B., J. Bingham, R.D. Blackwell, L.T. Evans, M.A. Ford, C.L. Morgan, and M. Taylor. 1980. Genetic improvements in whinter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. J. of Agric Sci (Cambridge)
94
:675–689.
- Austin, R.B., M.A. Ford, and C.L. Morgan. 1989. Genetic improvement in the yield of winter wheat: A further evaluation. J. Agric. Sci.
(Cambridge) 112
:295–302.
- Berger, M., and C. Planchon. 1990. Physiological factors determining yield in bread wheat- effects of introducing dwarfism genes. Euphytica
51
:33–39.[Web of Science]
- Borner, A., A.J. Worland, J. Plaschke, E. Schumann, and C.N. Law. 1993. Pleiotropic effects of genes for reduced height (Rht) and day-length insensitivity (Ppd) on yield and its components for wheat grown in middle Eur. Plant Breed.
111
:204–216.
- Boyer, J.R. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science (Washington, DC)
218
:443–448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Brancourt-Hulmel, M.D., G. Doussinault, C. Lecomte, P. Berard, B. Le Buanec, and M. Trottet. 2003. Genetic improvement of agronomic traits of winter wheat cultivars released in France from 1946 to 1992. Crop Sci.
43
:37–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Canevara, M.G., M. Romani, M. Corbellini, M. Perenzin, and B. Borghi. 1994. Evolutionary trends in morphological, physiological, agronomical and qualitative traits of Triticum aestivum L. cultivars bred in Italy since 1900. Eur. J. Agron.
3
:175–185.
- Condon, A.G., R.A. Richards, and G.D. Farquhar. 1987. Carbon isotope discrimination is positively correlated with grain yield and dry matter production in field-grown wheat. Crop Sci.
27
:996–1001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Condon, A.G., R.A. Richards, and R.A. Farquhar. 1993. Relationship between carbon isotope discrimination, water use efficiency and transpiration efficiency for dryland wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res.
44
:1693–1711.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Condon, A.G., R.A. Richards, G.J. Rebetzke, and G.D. Farquhar. 2002. Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci.
42
:122–131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cox, T.S., R. Shroyer, L. Ben-Hui, R.G. Sears, and T.J. Martin. 1988. Genetic improvement in agronomic traits of hard red winter wheat cultivars from 1919 to 1987. Crop Sci.
28
:756–760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Deckerd, E.L., R.H. Busch, and K.D. Kofoid. 1985. Physiological aspects of spring wheat improvement. p. 45–54. In J.E. Harper et al.(ed.) Exploitation of physiological and genetic variability to enhance crop productivity. Am. Soc. Plant Physiol., Rockland, MD.
- De Vita, P., O.L.D. Nicosia, F. Nigro, C. Platani, C. Riefolo, N. Di Fonzo, and L. Cattivelli. 2007. Breeding progress in morpho-physiological, agronomical and qualitative traits of durum wheat cultivars released in Italy during the 20th century. Eur. J. Agron.
26
:39–53.[CrossRef]
- Donmez, E., R.G. Sears, J.P. Shroyer, and G.M. Paulsen. 2001. Genetic gain in yield attributes of winter wheat in the Great Plains. Crop Sci.
41
:1412–1419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Farquhar, G.D., J.R. Ehleringer, and K.T. Hubick. 1989a. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.
40
:503–537.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Farquhar, G.D., and R.A. Richards. 1984. Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use-efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol.
11
:539–552.[Web of Science]
- Farquhar, G.D., S.C. Wong, J.R. Evans, and K.T. Hubick. 1989b. Photosynthesis and gas exchange. p. 47–69. In H.G. Jones et al. (ed.) Plants under stress. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
- Finlay, K.W., and G.N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res.
14
:742–754.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- García del Moral, L.F., Y. Rharabti, D. Villegas, and C. Royo. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions: An ontogenic approach. Agron. J.
95
:266–274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hanson, C.H., H.F. Robinson, and R.E. Comstock. 1956. Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Korean Lespedeza. Agron. J.
48
:268–272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Maliani, C. 1979. Nazareno Strampelli, a fore-runner in green revolution. Genet. Agrar.
33
:1–4.
- McCaig, T.N., and J.M. Clarke. 1995. Breeding durum wheat in western Canada. Historical trends in yield and related variables. Can. J. Plant Sci.
75
:55–60.
- Pecetti, L., and P. Annicchiarico. 1998. Agronomic value and plant type of Italian durum wheat cultivars from different eras of breeding. Euphytica
99
:9–15.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Perry, M.W., and M.F. D'Antuono. 1989. Yield improvement and associated characteristics of some Australian spring wheat cultivars introduced between 1860 and 1982. Aust. J. Agric. Res.
40
:457–472.[Web of Science]
- Pfeiffer, W.H., K.D. Sayre, and M. Mergoum. 1996. Enhancing genetic grain yield potential in durum wheat and triticale. p. 90–100. In M.P. Reynolds et al. (ed.) Increasing yield potential in wheat: Breaking the barriers. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F.
- Rajaram, S. 2001. Prospects and promise of wheat breeding in the 21st century. Euphytica
119
:3–15.[Web of Science]
- Rebetzke, G.J., A.G. Condon, R.A. Richards, and G.D. Farquhar. 2002. Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat. Crop Sci.
42
:739–745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Reynolds, M.P., S. Rajaram, and K.D. Sayre. 1999. Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post-green revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Sci.
39
:1611–1621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Reynolds, M.P., J. Van Beem, M. Van Ginkel, and D. Hoisington. 1996. Breaking the yield barriers in wheat: A brief summary of the outcomes of an international consultation. p. 1–10. In M.P. Reynolds et al.(ed.) Increasing yield potential in wheat: Breaking the barriers. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.
- Richards, R.A. 1996. Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regul.
20
:157–166.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Richards, R.A., G.J. Rebetzke, A.G. Condon, and A.F. Van Herwaarden. 2002. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Sci.
42
:111–121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Royo, C. 2005. Durum wheat improvement in Spain. p. 883–906. In C. Royo et al.(ed.) Durum wheat breeding: Current approaches and future strategies. Food Products Press, New York.
- Royo, C., F. Álvaro, V. Martos, A. Ramdani, J. Isidro, D. Villegas, and L.F. García del Moral. 2007. Genetic changes in durum wheat yield components and associated traits in Italian and Spanish cultivars during the 20th century. Euphytica
155
:259–270.[Web of Science]
- Royo, C., D. Villegas, L.F. García del Moral, S. El Hani, N. Aparicio, Y. Rharrabti, and J.L. Araus. 2002. Comparative performance of carbon isotope discrimination and canopy temperature depression as predictors of genotype differences in durum wheat yield in Spain. Aust. J. Agric. Res.
53
:561–570.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Royo, C., D. Villegas, Y. Rharrabti, R. Blanco, V. Martos, and L.F. García del Moral. 2006. Grain growth and yield formation of durum wheat grown at contracting latitudes and water regimes in a Mediterranean environment. Cereal Res. Commun.
34
:1021–1028.
- SAS Institute. 2000. SAS Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
- Shearman, V.J., R. Sylvester-Bradley, R.K. Scott, and M.J. Foulkes. 2005. Physiological processes associated with wheat yield progress in the UK. Crop Sci.
45
:175–185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Villegas, D., N. Aparicio, M.M. Nachit, J.L. Araus, and C. Royo. 2000. Photosynthetic and developmental traits associated with genotypic differences in durum wheat yield across the Mediterranean Basin. Aust. J. Agric. Res.
51
:891–901.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Waddington, S.R., M. Osmanzai, M. Yoshida, and J.K. Ransom. 1987. The yield of durum wheats released in Mexico between 1960 and 1984. J. Agric. Sci.
(Cambridge) 108
:469–477.
- Worland, T., and J.W. Snape. 2001. Genetic basis of worldwide wheat varietal improvement. p. 59–100. In A.P. Bonjean and W.J. Angus (ed.) The world wheat book, a history of wheat breeding. Lavoisier Publ., Paris.
- Youssefian, S., E.J.M. Kirby, and M.D. Gale. 1992. Pleiotropic effects of the GA-insensitive Rht dwarfing genes in wheat. 2. Effects on leaf, stem, ear and floret growth. Field Crops Res.
28
:191–210.[CrossRef]
- Zadoks, J.C., T.T. Chang, and C.F. Konzak. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stage of cereals. Weed Res.
14
:415–421.[CrossRef]