Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 99:1710-1718 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0314s
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walley, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lafond, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Walley, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lafond, G. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Walley, F. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lafond, G. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Legumes
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Dryland Cropping Systems
Right arrow Symbiosis
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Crop Systems
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity

Nitrogen Economy of Pulse Crop Production in the Northern Great Plains

Fran L. Walleya,*, George W. Claytonb, Perry R. Millerc, Patrick M. Carrd and Guy P. Lafonde

a Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada
b Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
c Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, 334 Leon Johnson Hall, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-3120
d Dickinson Res. Ext. Ctr., North Dakota State University, 1041 State Avenue, Dickinson, ND 58601
e Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Indian Head Research Farm, Box 760, Indian Head, SK S0G2K0


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Boxplots representing the proportion of N derived from N2 fixation according to published estimates of %Ndfa. Numbers reported for each pulse crop indicate the total number of published means comprising the estimates. The thick dark line indicates the median value, the box represents 50% of all data and the whiskers contain the remaining 50% of the data.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Fig. 2. Relationship between N2 fixation (%Ndfa) and the N increment (kg N ha–1). The overall relationship is described by a linear equation as follows: Ninc = 1.27 x %Ndfa – 60.5, r2 = 0.63, P ≤ 0.01. For individual crops, linear relationships are described as follows: pea Ninc = 1.78 x %Ndfa – 83.3, r2 = 0.47, P ≤ 0.05; lentil Ninc = 1.18 x %Ndfa – 56.4, r2 = 0.47; P ≤ 0.05; desi chickpea Ninc = 0.82 x %Ndfa – 45.3, r2 = 0.55, P ≤ 0.05; kabuli chickpea Ninc = 0.66 x %Ndfa – 37.5, r2 = 0.57, P ≤ 0.01; bean Ninc = 0.66 x %Ndfa – 34.4, r2 = 0.52, P ≤ 0.01; faba bean Ninc = 3.67 x %Ndfa – 240.2, r2 = 0.65, P ≤ 0.01.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Relationship between the accumulation of fixed N (kg N ha–1) and total N increment.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Boxplots representing the calculated N increment based on published estimates of grain yield and N2 fixation. Numbers reported for each pulse crop indicate the total number of calculated means comprising the estimates. The thick dark line indicates the median value, the box represents 50% of all data, and the whiskers contain the remaining 50% of the data. Outliers and extreme outliers (together with their numeric values) are indicated by open circles and asterisks, respectively.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Relationship between pulse grain yield (kg ha–1) and total N increment (kg N ha–1).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Relationship between pulse grain yield (kg ha–1) and shoot dry matter (kg ha–1). Only data for which either harvest index or both shoot and straw biomass yield were reported are included.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Boxplots representing total residue N inputs (kg N ha–1) (straw, roots, and rhizosphere exudates) based on published estimates. Numbers reported for each pulse crop indicate the total number of calculated means comprising the estimates. The thick dark line indicates the median value, the box represents 50% of all data, and the whiskers contain the remaining 50% of the data. Outliers (together with their numeric values) are indicated by open circles.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.