Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 99:1514-1520 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0371
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Soder, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Soder, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Soder, K. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Grazing Management

Soil Seed Bank Composition in Pastures of Diverse Mixtures of Temperate Forages

Matt A. Sandersona,*, Sarah C. Gosleea, Keith D. Klementb and Kathy J. Sodera

a USDA-ARS Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Bldg. 3702 Curtin Rd., University Park, PA 16802-3702
b USDA-ARS U.S. Sheep Experiment Station, Dubois, ID 83423


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. (a) Number of germinated seeds from all species and (b) from annual nonleguminous forbs in the soil seed bank of four pasture mixtures compared in an experiment at University Park, PA. Data are averaged for two replicates and five sampling periods. Means with different letters above the bars differ (P = 0.04). Significance tests were based on analysis of square-root transformed data. Analysis of untransformed data yielded approximately the same results; thus, untransformed means are presented along with an overall standard error for clarity.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. (a) Number of germinated seeds from all species (solid line) and from annual nonleguminous forbs (dashed line) in the soil seed bank at five sampling times at University Park, PA. (b) Density of perennial forbs, biennial forbs, perennial grasses, and perennial legumes. (c) Density of yellow woodsorrel, common chickweed, and white clover seeds during the same sampling times [bars indicate ±1 SE). Data are averaged for two replicates and four mixtures. There was a significant sampling period effect (P = 0.04) for each species group in (a), for the biennial forb and perennial grass groups in (b), and each species in (c). Significance tests were based on analysis of square-root transformed data. Analysis of untransformed data yielded approximately the same results; thus, untransformed means are presented.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Number of germinated seeds of shepherd's-purse and yellow woodsorrell in the soil seed bank of four pasture mixtures at University Park, PA. Bars with different letters differ at P < 0.05. Significance tests were based on analysis of square-root transformed data. Analysis of untransformed data yielded approximately the same results; thus, untransformed means are presented along with standard errors for clarity.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.