Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 99:1271-1277 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0188
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, G.
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, G.
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, G.
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Management
Right arrow Tobacco

Irrigation to Maximize Vaccine Antigen Production in Genetically Modified Tobacco

G. Stevensa,*, E. Voriesb, M. Muleskyc, M. Rhinea and D. Dunna

a Univ. of Missouri-Delta Research Center, P.O. Box 160, Portageville, MO 63873
b USDA Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit, Portageville, MO 63873
c Chlorogen, Inc., 893 North Warson Road, St. Louis, MO 63141


Figure 1
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Diagram of the arrangement of each plot for the irrigation experiment with soil in a glasshouse at Portageville, MO. Rainbird (Azusa, CA) XS-090 irrigation sprinklers were placed in opposite ends of each plot and adjusted to distribute water evenly without over-spraying plots. A narrow trench/dike was constructed around the border to contain run-off water and discourage root encroachment from neighboring plots. Watermark (Irrometer, Inc., Riverside, CA) soil moisture sensors were buried 10 cm deep in the center of each plot.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Soil water weight loss from evapotranspiration during 5 d without watering from pots growing protective antigen tobacco and Petite Havana (nontransgenic parent) plants. Bars indicate standard error mean.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Transpiration rate per leaf area during 5 d without watering from pots growing protective antigen tobacco and Petite Havana (nontransgenic parent) plants. Measurements were made with a portable photosynthesis system. Bars indicate standard error mean.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. SPAD chlorophyll meter readings from youngest developed leaf (fourth from apex) of protective antigen tobacco as affected by irrigation threshold based on soil water potential. Leaf measurements were made before both harvests. Points are means from four replicated plots with tobacco grown on Tiptonville sandy loam soil. Bars indicate standard error mean.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.