Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 99:999-1008 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0237
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tewolde, H.
Right arrow Articles by Adeli, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tewolde, H.
Right arrow Articles by Adeli, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tewolde, H.
Right arrow Articles by Adeli, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Animal Waste

Phosphorus Extraction by Cotton Fertilized with Broiler Litter

H. Tewoldea,*, K. R. Sistanib, D. E. Rowec and A. Adelic

a AWMRU, USDA-ARS, 810 Hwy. 12 East, Mississippi State, MS 39762
b AWMRU, USDA-ARS, 230 Bennett Ln., Bowling Green, KY 42104
c WMFRU, USDA-ARS, 810 Hwy. 12 East, Mississippi State, MS 39762


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Relationship between applied total plant available N and bulk leaf P concentration on selected dates in cotton grown with broiler litter with or without supplemental N as urea ammonium nitrate solution at Cruger (conventional-till) and Coffeeville (no-till) in Mississippi. Each data point is an average of three or four replications.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Amount of extracted phosphorus in plant parts of cotton grown with broiler litter with or without supplemental N as urea ammonium nitrate solution at Cruger (conventional-till) and Coffeeville (no-till) in Mississippi. Each data point is an average of three or four replications, 10 treatments, two locations, and 3 yr (2002–2004).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Total P extracted by cotton grown with broiler litter with or without supplemental N as urea ammonium nitrate solution (UAN-N) at Cruger (conventional-till) and Coffeeville (no-till) in Mississippi in 2002 to 2004. Each bar segment is an average of three or four replications. {dagger} Applied UAN-N rates in 2004 under the conventional-till were 67 and 135 kg ha–1 instead of the 34 and 67 kg ha–1 applied in 2002 and 2003. STD = farm standard fertilization.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Relationship of P partitioning to plant parts with applied total plant available nitrogen (NTPA) of cotton grown with broiler litter with or without supplemental N as urea ammonium nitrate solution at Cruger (conventional-till) and Coffeeville (no-till) in Mississippi in 2003.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.