Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 99:921-930 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0129
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krupinsky, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Krupinsky, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Krupinsky, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, J. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Dryland Cropping Systems
Right arrow Residue management

Crop Residue Coverage of Soil Influenced by Crop Sequence in a No-Till System

Joseph M. Krupinskya,*, Steven D. Merrilla, Donald L. Tanakaa, Mark A. Liebiga, Michael T. Laresb and Jonathan D. Hansona

a USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Lab., Box 0459, Mandan, ND 58554-0459
b Univ. of Mary, 7500 University Dr., Bismarck, ND 58504


Figure 1
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Growing season precipitation and average air temperature on a monthly basis over the course of the crop sequence project and 22 yr average. (A) Monthly precipitation. (B) Monthly average air temperature.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Crop residue coverage of soil surface (Project Year 2) measured after seeding spring wheat into the residue of 10 crops during the establishment of the crop matrix at two sites. Bars with the same letter do not differ significantly at P ≤ 0.05.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Crop residue coverage (Project Year 3) of selected groups of crop sequence treatments measured after seeding spring wheat into the residue of the crop matrix. * = crop sequence treatments with statistically less residue coverage than the continuous spring wheat treatment according to Dunnett's one-tailed t test (P < 0.05).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Summary of crop residue coverage of soil (Project Year 3) for 36 crop sequence combinations of three crops with higher residue coverage the following year (proso millet, grain sorghum, and spring wheat) and three crops with lower residue coverage the following year (lentil, chickpea and sunflower). Bars with the same letter do not differ significantly with Student-Newman-Keuls' test analyses (P ≤ 0.05). Low = lower crop residue coverage of soil surface, High = higher crop residue coverage of soil surface.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.