Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 3 October 2006
Published in Agron J 98:1551-1558 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0045
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sparrow, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sparrow, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sparrow, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Oat
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Solid and Liquid Cattle Manure Application in a Subarctic Soil

Bromegrass and Oat Production and Soil Properties

M. Zhanga,*, R. Gavlakb, A. Mitchellb and S. Sparrowa

a School of Natural Resources and Agric. Sciences, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775
b School of Natural Resources and Agric. Sciences, Univ. of Alaska, Palmer Research Center, Palmer, AK 99645


Figure 1
View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Biomass production of smooth bromegrass in first cut (a), second cut (b), and total (c) from 1999 to 2001 after manure application in May 1999 at Palmer, Alaska. Values with the same letter were not significantly different with LSD ≤ 5%. Control = no fertilizer or manure (average of Control, Water1, and Water2); F50 = 50 kg N ha–1 as fertilizer; F100 = 100 kg N ha–1 as fertilizer; F200 = 200 kg N ha–1 as fertilizer; L100 = 100 kg N ha–1 as liquid cattle manure; L200 = 200 kg N ha–1 as liquid cattle manure; S100 = 100 kg N ha–1 as solid cattle manure; and S200 = 200 kg N ha–1 as solid cattle manure.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Biomass production of oat from 1999 to 2001 after manure application in May 1999 at Palmer, Alaska. Values with the same letter were not significantly different with LSD ≤ 5%. Control = no fertilizer or manure (average of Control, Water1, and Water2); F50 = 50 kg N ha–1 as fertilizer; F100 = 100 kg N ha–1 as fertilizer; F200 = 200 kg N ha–1 as fertilizer; L100 = 100 kg N ha–1 as liquid cattle manure; L200 = 200 kg N ha–1 as liquid cattle manure; S100 = 100 kg N ha–1 as solid cattle manure; and S200 = 200 kg N ha–1 as solid cattle manure.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.