Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 October 2006
Published in Agron J 98:1479-1487 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0046
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Colvin, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Colvin, T. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Colvin, T. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Maize

Corn Yield and Nitrate Loss in Subsurface Drainage from Midseason Nitrogen Fertilizer Application

D. B. Jaynes* and T. S. Colvin

USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011


Figure 1
View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of the field within Iowa and the USA and the layout of tile drains, sumps, locations of high (H), medium (M), low (L), and responsive (R) N-fertilizer treatment plots and distribution of Okoboji silty clay loam, Harps loam, Ottosen clay loam and Kossuth silty clay loam soils as determined by Brevik et al. (2000).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Example of daily discharge rate and cumulative discharge depth from a tile drain for one of the low N-fertilizer treatment plots for 2002 through 2005. Cumulative precipitation for each year is also shown.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Chlorophyll (SPAD) values for corn relative to SPAD values from a nonlimiting N strip and the 95% confidence limits for different dates in 2002 and 2004. The N treatments for corn were H = 199 kg ha–1, M = 138 kg ha–1, L = 69 kg ha–1, R = 69 kg ha–1 of N applied at V1 to V3 with another 69 kg ha–1 N side-dressed at midseason (V16), and Z = no N fertilizer. Dotted horizontal line is at the 0.95 sufficiency threshold value. The dashed vertical line is the time of the midseason N application to the R treatment.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Residual soil NO3 concentration vs. depth for each N treatment after harvest in 2002 through 2005. The N treatments for corn were H = 199 kg ha–1, M = 138 kg ha–1, L = 69 kg ha–1, and R = 69 kg ha–1 of N applied at V1 to V3 with another 69 kg ha–1 N side-dressed at midseason (V16). No N fertilizer was applied to soybean. Corn was harvested in even years, soybean in odd years. Horizontal bars, where present, represent least significant difference where an F test was significant ({alpha} = 0.05).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.