Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 5 September 2006
Published in Agron J 98:1333-1339 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0236
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lippke, H.
Right arrow Articles by Provin, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lippke, H.
Right arrow Articles by Provin, T. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lippke, H.
Right arrow Articles by Provin, T. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Irrigation

Irrigated Annual Ryegrass Responses to Nitrogen and Phosphorus on Calcareous Soil

Hagen Lippkea,*, Vincent A. Habyb and Tony L. Provinc

a Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., 1619 Garner Field Rd., Uvalde, TX 78801
b Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., P.O. Box 200, Overton, TX 75684
c Dep. of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Treatment means for DM yield, Year 1. Model equation: t ha–1 = 2.836 + (NA x 1.142 x 10–2) + (PA x 3.907 x 10–2) + (NA x PA x 1.435 x 10–4) – (NA x NA x 1.585 x 10–5) – (PA x PA x 6.399 x 10–4), (n = 83, R2 = 0.92, s = 0.419).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Treatment means for DM yield, Year 2. Model equation: t ha–1 = 1.071 + (NA x 1.959 x 10–2) + (PA x.129) + (NA x PA x 1.746 x 10–4) – (NA x NA x 3.079 x 10–5) – (PA x PA x 1.690 x 10–3), (n = 83, R2 = 0.93, s = 0.764).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Treatment means for DM yield, Year 3. Model equation: t ha–1 = 0.964 + (NA x 1.330 x 10–2) + (PA x 0.1448) + (NA x PA x 1.555 x 10–4) – (NA x NA x 2.348 x 10–5) – (PA x PA x 1.874 x 10–3), (n = 83, R2 = 0.89, s = 0.846).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Treatment means for P uptake, Year 1. Model equation: kg ha–1 = 7.034 + (NA x 0.02918) + (PA x 0.1529) + (NA x PA x 3.671 x 10–4) – (NA x NA x 4.18 x 10–5) – (PA x PA x 2.097 x 10–3), (n = 20, R2 = 0.98, s = 0.69).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Treatment means for P uptake, Year 2. Model equation: kg ha–1 = 2.809 + (NA x 0.05415) + (PA x 0.4300) + (NA x PA x 6.046 x 10–4) – (NA x NA x 8.661 x 10–5) – (PA x PA x 5.315 x 10–3), (n = 21, R2 = 0.97, s = 2.05).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Treatment means for P uptake, Year 3. Model equation: kg ha–1 = 2.998 + (NA x 0.02890) + (PA x 0.3777) + (NA x PA x 3.863 x 10–4) – (NA x NA x 5.246 x 10–5) – (PA x PA x 4.280 x 10–3), (n = 21, R2 = 0.93, s = 2.10).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Pattern of forage P concentration by harvest for Years 1, 2, and 3.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Treatment means for N uptake, Year 1. Model equation: kg ha–1 = 40.16 + (NA x 0.5673) + (PA x 1.314) + (NA x PA x 4.332 x 10–3) – (NA x NA x 6.625 x 10–4) – (PA x PA x 2.236 x 10–2), (n = 20, R2 = 0.99, s = 7.70).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Treatment means for N uptake, Year 2. Model equation: kg ha–1 = 5.62 + (NA x 0.7608) + (PA x 4.234) + (NA x PA x 7.386 x 10–3) – (NA x NA x 10.86 x 10–4) – (PA x PA x 6.043 x 10–2), (n = 21, R2 = 0.97, s = 21.37).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Treatment means for N uptake, Year 3. Model equation: kg ha–1 = –4.78 + (NA x 0.5999) + (PA x 4.067) + (NA x PA x 6.418 x 10–3) – (NA x NA x 9.23 x 10–4) – (PA x PA x 5.812 x 10–2), (n = 21, R2 = 0.96, s = 20.62).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.