Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 August 2006
Published in Agron J 98:1227-1235 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0037
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belesky, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ruckle, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Belesky, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ruckle, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Belesky, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ruckle, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management

Prairiegrass–Brassica Hybrid Swards for Autumn Dry Matter Production

D. P. Belesky*, J. P. S. Neel and J. M. Ruckle

USDA-ARS, Appalachian Farming Syst. Res. Cent., 1224 Airport Rd., Beaver, WV 25813-9423


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Monthly and 30-yr mean maximum and minimum air temperatures and precipitation for 2003 and 2004, at Beckley, WV.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Botanical composition of prairiegrass, brassica hybrid, and a prairiegrass–brassica hybrid mixture during 2003 and 2004. Values representing the number of contacts (as a percentage) are the mean of three replicates.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Seeded species dry matter (DM) yield of prairiegrass, brassica hybrid, and prairiegrass–brassica hybrid mixtures in 2003 and 2004 as a function of planting method. Vertical bars are standard error of the mean.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Mean values for (A) relative yield and (B) relative yield of mixture for prairiegrass–brassica hybrid stands in 2003 and 2004.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mean values for (A) crude protein (CP), (B) total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC), and (C) total digestible nutrient (TDN) concentrations of prairiegrass, brassica hybrid, and prairiegrass–brassica hybrid mixtures during 2003 and 2004. Vertical bars are standard error of the mean.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Mean values for total digestible nutrient (TDN):crude protein (CP) quotients of stockpiled herbage of prairiegrass, brassica hybrid, and a prairiegrass–brassica hybrid in 2003 and 2004. Vertical bars are standard error of the mean.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Mean values for (A) relative nutrient yield and (B) relative nutrient yield of mixture for prairiegrass–brassica hybrid stands in 2003 and 2004.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.