Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 June 2006
Published in Agron J 98:1128-1136 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0005
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanco-Canqui, H.
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blanco-Canqui, H.
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Blanco-Canqui, H.
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Residue management
Right arrow Other Grain Crops

Changes in Long-Term No-Till Corn Growth and Yield under Different Rates of Stover Mulch

Humberto Blanco-Canquia,*, R. Lala, W. M. Postb and L. B. Owensc

a Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, FAES/OARDC, School of Natural Resources, The Ohio State Univ., 210 Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210-1085
b Environmental Sci. Div., Oak Ridge National Lab., Oak Ridge, TN 37831
c USDA-ARS, North Appalachian Experimental Watersheds, P.O. Box 488, Coshocton, OH 43812


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Corn height as a function of days after emergence under six stover treatments for three no-till sites in Ohio including Coshocton, Hoytille, and South Charleston. The six treatments including 0 (T0), 25 (T25), 50 (T50), 75 (T75), 100 (T100), and 200 (T200)% of corn stover correspond to 0, 1.25, 2.50, 3.75, 5.00, and 10.00 Mg ha–1 of stover, respectively. The error bars represent the LSD(0.05) for treatment comparisons.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relationship between corn height and six stover rates (0, 1.25, 2.50, 3.75, 5.00, and 10.00 Mg ha–1) at 8 d after emergence and silking stage under three no-till sites in Ohio.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Variations in soil water content from corn emergence to silking stage for three no-till sites in Ohio. The six treatments including 0 (T0), 25 (T25), 50 (T50), 75 (T75), 100 (T100), and 200 (T200)% of corn stover correspond to 0, 1.25, 2.50, 3.75, 5.00, and 10.00 Mg ha–1 of stover, respectively. The error bars represent the LSD(0.05) for treatment comparisons.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Variations in soil temperature from corn emergence to silking stage for three no-till sites in Ohio. The six treatments including 0 (T0), 25 (T25), 50 (T50), 75 (T75), 100 (T100), and 200 (T200)% of corn stover correspond to 0, 1.25, 2.50, 3.75, 5.00, and 10.00 Mg ha–1 of stover, respectively. The error bars represent the LSD(0.05) for treatment comparisons.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Corn height as a function of changes in soil temperature for three no-till sites in Ohio. The six treatments including 0 (T0), 25 (T25), 50 (T50), 75 (T75), 100 (T100), and 200 (T200)% of corn stover correspond to 0, 1.25, 2.50, 3.75, 5.00, and 10.00 Mg ha–1 of stover, respectively.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Corn height as a function of changes in soil water content for three no-till sites in Ohio. The six treatments including 0 (T0), 25 (T25), 50 (T50), 75 (T75), 100 (T100), and 200 (T200)% of corn stover correspond to 0, 1.25, 2.50, 3.75, 5.00, and 10.00 Mg ha–1 of stover, respectively.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Corn (A) grain and (B) stover yield under six stover treatments for three no-till sites in Ohio. The error bars represent the LSD0.05 for treatment comparisons. The six rates of stover retention of 0, 1.25, 2.50, 3.75, 5.00, and 10.00 Mg ha–1 correspond to 0 (T0), 25 (T25), 50 (T50), 75 (T75), 100 (T100), and 200 (T200) % of corn stover, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.