HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ghosh, P. K. Articles by Subba Rao, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ghosh, P. K. Articles by Subba Rao, A. Agricola Articles by Ghosh, P. K. Articles by Subba Rao, A. Related Collections Intercropping Systems

Interspecific Interaction and Nutrient Use in Soybean/Sorghum Intercropping System

^a ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793103
^b Indian Inst. of Soil Sci., Nabibagh, Berasia Rd., Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India 462038

View larger version (19K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Total monthly rainfall from January 2000 to December 2004 and the 22-yr average near the experimental site on the research farm of the Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal, India.

View larger version (9K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Sketch of soybean/sorghum intercrop row (each spacing of 30 cm) pattern.

View larger version (47K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. (a) Crop growth rate and (b) chlorophyll content of soybean and sorghum under sole and intercropping under various nutrient management. Data following common letters are not significantly different at 5% probability as per Duncan's multiple range tests. H, harvest; FYM, farmyard manure; PC, phosphocompost; PM, poultry manure.

View larger version (61K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Trends in nitrate reductase activity (NRA) in sole and intercropping under different nutrient management. Data following common letters are not significantly different at 5% probability as per Duncan's multiple range tests. FW, fresh weight; FYM, farmyard manure; PC, phosphocompost; PM, poultry manure.

View larger version (53K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Trend in (a) shoot biomass, (b) N uptake, and (c) photosynthesis rate in middle rows of soybean and rows adjacent to sorghum. Data following common letters are not significantly different at 5% probability as per Duncan's multiple range tests. FYM, farmyard manure; PC, phosphocompost; PM, poultry manure.

View larger version (46K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Trends in (a) root length density, (b) root biomass, and (c) nodule mass of middle rows of soybean and rows adjacent to sorghum. Data following common letters are not significantly different at 5% probability as per Duncan's multiple range tests. FYM, farmyard manure; PC, phosphocompost; PM, poultry manure.

View larger version (42K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Root length density of sole and intercrop of soybean and sorghum as influenced by nutrient management. Data following common letters are not significantly different at 5% probability as per Duncan's multiple range tests. FYM, farmyard manure; PC, phosphocompost; PM, poultry manure.