Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 98:1050-1059 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0350
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linquist, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Linquist, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Linquist, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rice
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Residue management
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Winter Straw and Water Management Effects on Soil Nitrogen Dynamics in California Rice Systems

Bruce A. Linquista,*, Sylvie M. Brouderb and James E. Hilla

a Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616
b Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907-1105


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Precipitation and maximum and minimum temperatures during the 1995–1996 winter and spring.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Soil extractable N (ExN) as affected by winter flood (F) or no flooding (NF) and winter straw management in the –N microplots. Sample times were before draining the winter flood treatments, during the spring dry down period, and during the growing season in the –N plots for both Maxwell and Biggs sites. All plots were flooded at Maxwell on 5 May and at Biggs on 16 May in preparation for planting. Above each sample time, where differences are significant, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) results are presented for the effect of winter flood (F) the effect of straw management (S) and the interaction (F x S). *, **, and *** represent a significance level of 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Soil extractable N (ExN) as affected by winter flood (F) or no flooding (NF) and winter straw management in the main field (+N). Sample times were during the growing season. All plots were flooded at Maxwell on 5 May and at Biggs on 16 May in preparation for planting. Above each sample time, where differences are significant, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) results are presented for the effect of winter flood (F) the effect of straw management (S) and the interaction (F x S). *, **, and *** represent a significance level of 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.