Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 May 2006
Published in Agron J 98:830-838 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0252
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarara, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tarara, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tarara, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, J. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Field-Scale Studies
Right arrow Numerical Solutions
Right arrow Field evaluation techniques
Right arrow Data acquisition and assimilation
Right arrow Software

Two Algorithms for Variable Power Control of Heat-Balance Sap Flow Gauges under High Flow Rates

Julie M. Tarara* and John C. Ferguson

USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, 24106 N. Bunn Rd., Prosser, WA 99350


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Typical daytime course of (A) power (Q); (B) temperature difference between upstream and downstream thermopiles ({Delta}T), with dashed line representing {Delta}Ttarget of 1.3°C.; and (C) sap flow and global irradiance (Rs) under clear skies for a representative heat-balance sap flow gauge on a 10-yr-old well-watered Concord vine in a semiarid environment. The gauge was operated under variable power control using a PD algorithm. Data were collected DOY 202, 2000. Overnight, Q was held at 0.2 W to avoid overheating the stem.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Example of protracted oscillation in power control by the PD algorithm for a representative heat-balance sap flow gauge on a 10-yr-old well-watered Concord vine in a semiarid environment, when flow rates were below those for which the algorithm had been tuned. (A) Power to the gauge heater (Q); (B) temperature difference between upstream and downstream thermopiles ({Delta}T), with dashed line representing {Delta}Ttarget of 1.3°C.; (C) sap flow and global irradiance (Rs). Data were collected DOY 269, 2000.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Performance of a representative heat-balance sap flow gauge operated in constant power mode on a 10-yr-old well-watered Concord vine in a semiarid environment. (A) Power to the gauge heater (Q); (B) temperature difference between upstream and downstream thermopiles ({Delta}T), with dashed line representing {Delta}T of 1.3°C; (C) sap flow and global irradiance (Rs). The substantial error that can occur due to small {Delta}T is evident around 10.00 LST. Data were collected on DOY 272, 2000.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Exemplary diurnal curve of power (Q) applied to the gauge heater by the open-loop algorithm on a day with clear skies. The divergence of Q from irradiance (Rs) at either end of daylight hours reflects the start time of the controller at 60 min before the computed value for sunrise and the stop time of the controller at 60 min after the computed value for sunset. Nighttime Q was held constant at 0.2 W (horizontal reference line).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Performance of an exemplary heat-balance sap flow gauge on deficit-irrigated Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines during 5 d encompassing the end of a weekly dry-down and rewatering. Irrigation was applied by drip (0.75 L h–1 vine–1) for 17 h overnight DOY 233 to 234 and 16 h overnight DOY 234 to 235. (A) Power to the gauge heater (Q); (B) temperature difference between upstream and downstream thermopiles ({Delta}T); (C) sap flow and global irradiance (Rs). The gauge was operated under variable power control using an open-loop algorithm. Maximum allowable Q deliberately adjusted on DOY 233. Arrow in (A) denotes time at which program implemented the high-temperature "fail-safe" mechanism, reducing Q to 0.25Q for the remainder of DOY 234. Horizontal reference line in (B) is {Delta}Ttarget. Data were collected during 2003.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Performance of a representative heat-balance sap flow gauge operated under variable power control using an open-loop algorithm. The gauge was on an 11-yr-old deficit-irrigated Cabernet Sauvignon vine in a semiarid environment. (A) Power to the gauge heater (Q); (B) temperature difference between upstream and downstream thermopiles ({Delta}T); (C) sap flow and global irradiance (Rs). Data were recorded on DOY 237, 2003. Horizontal reference line in (B) is {Delta}Ttarget (1.5°C).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.