HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Clawson, E. L. Articles by Blouin, D. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Clawson, E. L. Articles by Blouin, D. C. Agricola Articles by Clawson, E. L. Articles by Blouin, D. C. Related Collections Crop Growth and Development Crop Physiology & Metabolism Other Cropping Systems Cotton Plant Nutrition

Nitrogen Fertilization and Yield of Cotton in Ultra-Narrow and Conventional Row Spacings

^a Lousiana State Univ. Agric. Cent., P.O. Box 438, Saint Joseph, LA 71366
^b Texas A&M Univ., Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, College Station, TX 77843-2474
^c Lousiana State Univ., Dep. of Experimental Statistics, 161 Agric. Administration Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-5606

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Effect of row spacing on lint yield, 2000–2002, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Farm, Burleson County, Texas. Lint yield means for each row spacing are listed above the respective columns. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to the Tukey-Kramer method (0.05).

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Effect of N fertilizer rate on lint yield, 2000–2002, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Farm, Burleson County, Texas. Lint yield means for each N rate are listed above the respective columns. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to the Tukey-Kramer method (0.05).