Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 98:63-71 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0174
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bausch, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bausch, W. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Halvorson, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bausch, W. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Tillage

Nitrogen and Tillage Effects on Irrigated Continuous Corn Yields

Ardell D. Halvorsona,*, Arvin R. Mosierb, Curtis A. Reulea and Walter C. Bauscha

a USDA-ARS, 2150 Cent. Ave., Bldg. D, Suite 100, Fort Collins, CO 80526
b Agric. and Biol. Eng. Dep., Univ. of Florida, 281 Frazier Rogers Bldg., Museum Rd., P.O. Box 110570, Gainesville, FL 32611



View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Corn grain yields in conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) treatments as a function of N fertilizer application rate for five crop years at Fort Collins, CO.

 


View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Corn grain yields in conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) treatments as a function of plant available N [soil N (0–90 cm depth) plus fertilizer N applied] for five crop years at Fort Collins, CO.

 


View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Total N removed in grain from plot area in conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) systems with increasing N rate each crop year from 2000 through 2004.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Amount of N removed in 1 Mg of grain as a function of N rate and year for the conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) systems.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Corn residue production for conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) systems as a function of N rate averaged over years from 2000 through 2004.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Corn residue N uptake as a function of N rate and year for the conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) systems.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Total N uptake (grain N + residue N) as a function of N rate and year for the conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) systems.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Total N requirement to produce 1 Mg of grain as a function of N rate and year for the conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) systems.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.