Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 19 October 2005
Published in Agron J 97:1485-1492 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.0323
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruffo, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ruffo, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ruffo, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spatial Distribution
Right arrow Predictive soil mapping
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Nitrogen

Spatial Variability of the Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test

Implications for Soil Sampling

Matías L. Ruffo, Germán A. Bollero*, Robert G. Hoeft and Donald G. Bullock

Department of Crop Sciences, Univ. of Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801



View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of experimental sites. Squares represent adjacent fields where experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003, triangles represent 2002 fields, and circles represent 2003 fields.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Soil sampling design for ISNT at A02. Detail of nested cell.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Maximum ordinary kriging standard error (SE) (mg kg–1) as a function of grid spacing (m) for the 2002 fields.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Maximum ordinary kriging standard error (SE) (mg kg–1) as a function of grid spacing (m) for the 2003 fields.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.