Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 17 August 2005
Published in Agron J 97:1322-1332 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0008
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ball Coelho, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bruin, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ball Coelho, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bruin, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ball Coelho, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bruin, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Maize Management
Right arrow Animal Waste

Optimization of Liquid Swine Manure Sidedress Rate and Method for Grain Corn

B. R. Ball Coelhoa,*, R. C. Royb and A. J. Bruina

a Agric. & Agri-Food Canada, Southern Crop Protection & Food Res. Cent., 1391 Sandford St., London, ON, Canada N5V 4T3
b Agric. & Agri-Food Canada, Southern Crop Protection & Food Res. Cent., Delhi, ON, Canada, N4B 2W9



View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Yearly comparisons of plot- (by manual harvesting) and field- (by combine yield monitor) scale corn grain yield following sidedress of liquid swine manure with different rates and methods. r = correlation coefficient.

 


View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Corn growth response to injected (INJ) or topdressed (TD) liquid swine manure sidedressed at different rates (m3 ha–1) on (A) 18 July 2001 and (B) 23 July 2002.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Corn grain yield response to injected (INJ) or topdressed (TD) liquid swine manure (LSM) sidedressed at 0, 37.4, or 56.1 m3 ha–1, average of 1999–2002 plot-scale data. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Corn grain yield response curves to sidedress injection rate of liquid swine manure (LSM) from 1999 to 2002. Yields are adjusted for presidedress topsoil NO3 concentration. Large symbols represent the rate required for 95% maximum yield for plot- (colored symbol) and field- (gray symbol) scale data sets. Solid and dashed lines represent quadratic fits for plot- and field-scale yields, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.