HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Anapalli, S. S. Articles by Halvorson, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Anapalli, S. S. Articles by Halvorson, A. D. Agricola Articles by Anapalli, S. S. Articles by Halvorson, A. D. Related Collections Water Use Dryland Cropping Systems Soil Organic Matter Maize Wheat Crop Models Soil Models Tillage

Effectiveness of RZWQM for Simulating Alternative Great Plains Cropping Systems

^a USDA-ARS, Great Plains Syst. Res., 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. D, Suite 200, Fort Collins, CO 80526
^b USDA-ARS, Central Great Plains Res. Stn., 40335 County Rd. GG, Akron, CO 80720
^c USDA-ARS, Soil Plant Nutrient Res., 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. D, Suite 100, Fort Collins, CO 80526

View larger version (34K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Measured and predicted (RZWQM) total profile (180 cm) soil water under wheat fallow (WF) for the beginning wheat data set: (a) conventional tillage (CT), (b) no-till (NT), (c) comparison of predicted soil water under WF(CT) and WF(NT), and (d) comparison of measured soil water under WF(CT) and WF(NT).

View larger version (34K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Measured and predicted (RZWQM) total profile (180 cm) soil water under wheat fallow (WF) for the beginning fallow data set: (a) conventional tillage (CT), (b) no-till (NT), (c) comparison of predicted soil water under WF(CT) and WF(NT), and (d) comparison of measured soil water under WF(CT) and WF(NT).

View larger version (36K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Comparison between measured and RZWQM-predicted total profile (180 cm) soil water under wheat–corn–fallow no-till [WCF(NT)] beginning with (a) wheat, (b) corn, and (c) fallow phases in 1992.

View larger version (37K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Model simulations of residue dynamics and residue effects on soil evaporation from conventional till (CT) and no-till (NT) systems in the wheat–fallow cropping system (beginning fallow data set): (a) flat residue mass on the soil surface, (b) residue evaporative resistance, and (c) potential soil evaporation.

View larger version (23K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Comparison between measured and predicted (RZWQM) wheat evapotranspiration (ET) for wheat–fallow (WF) cropping systems in beginning fallow (WF-F) and beginning wheat (WF-W) data sets. Error bars show one standard deviation about the mean of measured ET. CT, conventional till; NT, no-till.

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Comparison between measured and predicted (RZWQM) wheat and corn evapotranspiration (ET) for the wheat–corn–fallow (WCF) cropping system in the beginning wheat (WCF-W), beginning corn (WCF-C), and beginning fallow (WCF-F) data sets. Error bars show one standard deviation about the mean of measured ET.

View larger version (24K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Comparison between measured and predicted (RZWQM) wheat grain yields for the wheat–fallow (WF) cropping systems in beginning fallow (WF-F) and beginning wheat (WF-W) data sets. Error bars show one standard deviation about the mean of measured yield. CT, conventional till; NT, no-till.

View larger version (22K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Comparison between measured and predicted (RZWQM) wheat and corn grain yield for the wheat–corn–fallow (WCF) cropping system in the beginning wheat (WCF-W), beginning corn (WCF-C), and beginning fallow (WCF-F) data sets. Error bars show one standard deviation about the mean of measured yield.

View larger version (24K): [in a new window]   Fig. 9. Comparison between measured and predicted (RZWQM) wheat biomass for the wheat–fallow (WF) cropping systems in beginning fallow (WF-F) and beginning wheat (WF-W) data sets. Error bars show one standard deviation about the mean of measured biomass. CT, conventional till; NT, no-till.

View larger version (21K): [in a new window]   Fig. 10. Comparison between measured and predicted (RZWQM) wheat and corn biomass for the wheat–corn–fallow (WCF) cropping system in the beginning wheat (WCF-W), beginning corn (WCF-C), and beginning fallow (WCF-F) data sets. Error bars show one standard deviation about the mean of measured biomass.