Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 17 June 2005
Published in Agron J 97:1062-1071 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.0152
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moinuddin,
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moinuddin,
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Moinuddin,
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Stress
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism

Osmotic Adjustment in Wheat in Relation to Grain Yield under Water Deficit Environments

Moinuddina,*, R. A. Fischerb, K. D. Sayrec and M. P. Reynoldsc

a Plant Physiol. Lab., Potash Res. Inst. of India, Sector-19, Dundahera, Gurgaon-122016, Haryana, India
b Aust. Cent. for Int. Agric. Res., GPO Box 1571, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
c Int. Cent. for Improvement of Maize and Wheat (CIMMYT), Lisboa 27, Apdo Postal 6-641, 0660, Mexico, D.F., Mexico



View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Layout of the double line source experiment (Field Exp. 3). LS1 and LS2 represent the two line sources, lying in parallel 15 m apart. The 15-m block extended on each side of the two line sources comprised 75 plots arranged perpendicular to the sprinkler line. Each plot was 1.2 m wide carrying six rows. Numbers 1–5 represent the line source moisture levels. The moisture level nearest to the line source (Level 1) was assumed as the irrigated plot (control) as it received the maximum water applied by the line source. LS1 was activated every 10 d for 1 h throughout the crop season while LS2 started functioning similarly after anthesis.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Genetic variance and heritability of osmotic adjustment (OA), osmotic potential at full turgor (OP100), and turgor potential (TP) computed by the pooled analysis of variance across the six greenhouse experiments.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (A and B) Relationship of yield stability index (YSI) and drought susceptibility index (DSI) with grain yield attained at fifth moisture level (T5) of the line source, and (C) the relationship between YSI and DSI (n = 8) (Field Exp. 1).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationships of osmotic adjustment with (A) osmotic potential at full turgor and (B) turgor potential. All data points represent mean values across the six greenhouse experiments.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.