Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 97:943-948 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.0129
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Plant, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Plant, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Roel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Plant, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development

Effect of Low Water Temperature on Rice Yield in California

A. Roela, R. G. Muttersb, J. W. Eckertb and R. E. Plantc,*

a Graduate Group in Ecology, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616 (present address: Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay)
b Univ. of California Coop. Ext., Oroville, CA 95965
c Dep. of Agronomy and Range Science and Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Sensor deployment in both (a) Field 1 and (b) Field 2. Arrows indicate water intake and flows.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Temperature record from sensors located in the coldest (Sensor 12) and warmest (Sensor 26) parts of Field 1 in 2001. The pattern from Field 2 was similar except that all temperatures were warmer and oscillations at the end of the season tended to be much smaller.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Plots of the data for Field 1 for the value of Tb that provided the best fit. In each curve the solid line is the simple linear regression and the dashed line is the best fitting exponential model.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Plots of the data for Field 2 for the value of Tb that provided the best fit. In each curve the solid line is the simple linear regression.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Plot of the aggregated data for Tb = 20°C of all field–year combinations. The solid curve is the best fit of the modified logistic equation of the form of Eq. [1] in the text.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.