Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 13 May 2005
Published in Agron J 97:839-846 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2003.0241
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hashemi, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hashemi, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, D. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hashemi, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, D. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Maize Management

Yield Response of Corn to Crowding Stress

Abolhassan M. Hashemia,*, Stephen J. Herberta and Daniel H. Putnamb

a Dep. of Plant, Soil, and Insects Sci., Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-9294
b Dep. of Agron. and Range Sci., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616-8515



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of plant density and removal on total grain yield for three corn hybrids. R0, R1, R2, and R3 are no removal and removal of alternate plants at vegetative, tasseling, and early grain-filling stages of growth, respectively. Data points represent plant densities after thinning. Results are average of 2 yr except for 2000. L, Q, and NS represent linear, quadratic, and nonsignificant response, respectively. **Significant at P = 0.01.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of plant density and removal on biomass yield for three corn hybrids. R0, R1, R2, and R3 are no removal and removal of alternate plants at vegetative, tasseling, and early grain-filling stages of growth, respectively. Data points represent plant densities after thinning. Results are average of 2 yr except for 2000. L and Q represent linear and quadratic response, respectively. *Significant at P = 0.05; **Significant at P = 0.01.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of plant density on harvest index for three corn hybrids. Results are average of 2 yr except for 2000. L and Q represent linear and quadratic response, respectively. *Significant at P = 0.05; **Significant at P = 0.01.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of plant density on ear yield components as a proportion of isolated plants for three corn hybrids. Results are average of 2 yr except for 2000. All lines shown were significant with linear trends (P = 0.01).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of plant density and removal on ear number per plant for three corn hybrids. R0, R1, R2, and R3 are no removal and removal of alternate plants at vegetative, tasseling, and early grain-filling stages of growth, respectively. Data points represent plant densities after thinning. Results and significant trends are average of 2 yr except for 2000. L, Q, and NS represent linear, quadratic, and nonsignificant response, respectively. Significant at P = 0.05; **Significant at P = 0.01.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effect of plant density and removal on kernel number per row for three corn hybrids. R0, R1, R2, and R3 are no removal and removal of alternate plants at vegetative, tasseling, and early grain-filling stages of growth, respectively. Data points represent plant densities after thinning. Results and significant trends are average of 2 yr except for 2000. L, Q, and NS represent linear, quadratic, and nonsignificant response, respectively. Significant at P = 0.05; **Significant at P = 0.01.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Effect of plant density and removal on average kernel weight for three corn hybrids. R0, R1, R2, and R3 are no removal and removal of alternate plants at vegetative, tasseling, and early grain-filling stage of growth, respectively. Data points represent plant densities after thinning. Results and significant trends are average of 2 yr except for 2000. L, Q, and NS represent linear, quadratic, and nonsignificant response, respectively. Significant at P = 0.05; **Significant at P = 0.01.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.