Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bremer, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ham, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bremer, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ham, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bremer, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ham, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Turfgrass
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions

MEASUREMENT AND PARTITIONING OF IN SITU CARBON DIOXIDE FLUXES IN TURFGRASSES USING A PRESSURIZED CHAMBER

Dale J. Bremera,* and Jay M. Hamb

a Dep. of Hortic., Forestry and Recreation Resour., 2021 Throckmorton Hall, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
b Dep. of Agron., 2004 Throckmorton Hall, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Conceptual diagram that illustrates the design of the pressurized chamber system. A variable-flow air pump and micromanometer were used to regulate chamber pressure. A mass flow meter was used to monitor the air flow into the chamber, and results were used to correct fluxes for the effect of gas concentration dilution in the chamber.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Apparent values in perennial ryegrass of (A) net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE; sunlit chamber) and (B) the sum of canopy and soil respiration (Rc + Rs; shaded chamber) in response to changes in chamber pressure. The apparent increase in NEE and decrease in Rc + Rs with chamber pressure were caused by the corresponding suppression of (C) soil respiration entering the chamber (Rs; bare soil); the bare soil area was surrounded closely by perennial ryegrass. Note: Scale of y axis of 2B is different from 2A and 2C.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Measurements of soil respiration as a function of increasing chamber pressure. Soils were (A) bare silt loam surrounded by Kentucky bluegrass, (B) sand between crowns of big bluestem, and (C) sand in an area devoid of vegetation. Note: Scale of y axis of 3A is different from 3B and 3C.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Comparison of CO2 fluxes measured sequentially with the unmodified chamber (normal operation; sunlit) and then with the modified chamber (pressurized; sunlit) in perennial ryegrass (PR), Kentucky bluegrass (KBG), and tall fescue (TF). PR and TF were measured on multiple dates.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.