Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eghball, B.
Right arrow Articles by Eigenberg, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eghball, B.
Right arrow Articles by Eigenberg, R. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eghball, B.
Right arrow Articles by Eigenberg, R. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Animal Waste

Plant Availability of Phosphorus in Swine Slurry and Cattle Feedlot Manure

Bahman Eghballa,{dagger}, Brian J. Wienholda,*, Bryan L. Woodburyb and Roger A. Eigenbergb

a USDA-ARS, Lincoln, NE 68583
b USDA-ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933



View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Soil x temperature x manure x water regime interaction means averaged across sampling times. Water regimes were constant (60% water-filled pore space, WFPS) or variable (dry down from 60 to 30% WFPS). NOM indicates no manure, and MAN indicates swine manure application.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Phosphorus levels in three soils incubated with either swine slurry or no manure averaged across sampling times and water regimes.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Water-soluble P, averaged across water regime, in three soils incubated with either swine slurry or no manure and sampled at different times. Time T0 is when soil samples were taken on the day the experiment started, and T2 and T4 are sampling cycles when the soil in the varying water regime treatment reached 30% water-filled pore space.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil test P levels as influenced by (a) incubation temperature and sampling times and (b) soil and sampling time for the beef cattle feedlot manure study. Time T0 is when soil samples were taken on the day the experiment started, and T1 to T4 are sampling cycles when the soil in the varying water regime treatment reached 30% water-filled pore space.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Water-soluble P levels in three soils as influenced by (a) incubation temperature and (b) beef cattle feedlot manure and no-manure treatments.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.