Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ma, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Costa, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ma, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Costa, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ma, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Costa, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Plant Nutrition
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Maize Management

Comparison of Crop-Based Indicators with Soil Nitrate Test for Corn Nitrogen Requirement

B. L. Maa,*, K. D. Subedia and C. Costab

a Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Res. Cent. (ECORC), Cent. Exp. Farm, Res. Branch, Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0C6
b Univ. of Paso Fundo, Paso Fundo, RS, 99001-970, Brazil



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Monthly total precipitation (mm) during the growing seasons of 2000, 2001, and 2002 (May to September) compared with the 42-yr (1961–2002) average precipitation at the Central Experiment Farm, Ottawa.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Differentiation of preplant N effects by leaf chlorophyll meter (SPAD) and canopy reflectance [normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)] measured at V6. The bars followed by different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05).

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of preplant N treatments on whole-plant N concentrations of two hybrids at V6 growth stage in 2001 and 2002. The bars followed by different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05).

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of preplant N treatments on the soil NO3–N at V6 growth stage for 2000, 2001, and 2002. Error bars associated with each data point indicate spatial variability in soil NO3–N.

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of different N treatments on corn grain yield (Mg ha–1) in 3 yrs. The bars labeled with the same letter are not statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05 within each year. The N treatments are 0, 40, 80, 120, 250, 0 + 80, 40 + 40, and 40 + 160 kg N ha–1. The first five N treatments are preplant applications, and the last three treatments are combinations of preplant and sidedress applications.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effect of different N treatments on the total N uptake in stover and grain at maturity in 3 yr. The values in the bars represent kg N ha–1. The bars following with the same letter are not significant at P ≤ 0.05 for the total N uptake (i.e., stover + grain N). The LSD values are 12.6, 6.4, and 8.9 kg N ha–1, respectively, for stover N in 2000, 2001, and 2002, and 13.9, 11.9, and 18.1 kg N ha–1, respectively, for grain N in 2000, 2001, and 2002.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.