Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Vories, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Vories, E. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Vories, E. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Maize

Light Interception and Yield Potential of Short-Season Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids in the Midsouth

Jeffrey T. Edwardsa, Larry C. Purcellb,* and Earl D. Voriesc

a Dep. of Plant and Soil Sci., Oklahoma State Univ., 368 Agricultural Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078
b Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environ. Sci., Univ. of Arkansas, 1366 W Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
c USDA-ARS, Portageville, MO 63873



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mean aboveground biomass at harvest as a function of maize plant population for (A) short-season and (B) full-season hybrids at Fayetteville, AR, in 2001, 2002, and 2003 and Keiser, AR, in 2002 and 2003. Data points are the mean value for each environment by hybrid by seeded population combination. Both linear and nonlinear regression were nonsignificant for full-season hybrids.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Mean yield as a function of maize plant population for (A) short-season and (B) full-season hybrids at Fayetteville, AR, in 2001, 2002, and 2003 and Keiser, AR, in 2002 and 2003. Data points are the mean value for each environment by hybrid by seeded population combination.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (A) Average seed mass and (B) maize seed quantity as a function of plant population at Fayetteville, AR, in 2001, 2002, and 2003 and Keiser, AR, in 2002 and 2003. Data points are the mean value for each environment by hybrid by seeded population combination.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (A) Maize aboveground biomass at harvest and (B) yield as a function of cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) at Fayetteville, AR, in 2001, 2002, and 2003 and Keiser, AR, in 2002 and 2003. Data points are the mean value for each environment by hybrid by seeded population combination.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Relationship between maize plant population and cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) for maize requiring 850, 950, 1050, or 1150°Cd from emergence to black layer as described by the equation CIPAR = –253 + 0.64 (°Cd) + 11 (maize plants m–2). Horizontal lines represent CIPAR necessary to obtain 900, 1000, and 1100 g m–2 of maize yield, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy.