Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Plant, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Plant, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Roel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Plant, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rice
Right arrow Site-Specific Analysis

Factors Underlying Yield Variability in Two California Rice Fields

Alvaro Roela,c and Richard E. Plantb,*

a Graduate Group in Ecology, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
b Dep. of Agron. and Range Sci. and Dep. of Biol. and Agric. Eng., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
c Present address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Soil sampling locations in (a) Field 1 and (b) Field 2.

 


View larger version (84K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cluster sets of Field 1. The number code identifies the value of k, which is the number of clusters, followed by the identification number of the set. For example, Set 2-1 is the first set of two clusters (k = 2). The numbers in the legend identify the gray-scale key of the elements belonging to each cluster.

 


View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Large-scale yield trends obtained by Roel and Plant (2004) for Field 1 using median polish. Redrawn from Roel and Plant (2004).

 


View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Large-scale yield trends obtained by Roel and Plant (2004) for Field 2 using median polish. Redrawn form Roel and Plant (2004).

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Cluster means for the clusters of Fig. 2. Each plot shows the sequence of means of standardized yield values, obtained by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation, of the corresponding cluster for each of the 4 yr of data. To conserve space, the axes are not labeled. The abscissa is the year, and the ordinate is the standardized cluster mean.

 


View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Cluster sets of Field 2. Coding and legend keys are the same as those of Fig. 2.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Cluster means for the clusters of Fig. 6. Each plot shows the sequence of means of standardized yield values, obtained by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation, of the corresponding cluster for each of the 3 yr of data for this field. To conserve space, the axes are not labeled. The abscissa is the year, and the ordinate is the standardized cluster mean.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Classification tree obtained for clusters of Field 1 at k = 4. The value of N in each box indicates the number of elements comprising that node of the classification tree. For example, the value N = 18 in the uppermost box indicates that there are 18 elements in which normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)-2001 > 0.425 and soil penetration resistance (SP) > 0.38. The numbers on the second line in each box indicate the percentages of each cluster contained in that classification and regression trees (CART) node. For example, the node corresponding to the uppermost box is comprised of 28% Cluster 1, 33% Cluster 2, etc. Boxes with rounded corners indicate terminal nodes with a majority of members from one cluster, in which case the node is identified with that cluster. For example, the node corresponding to NDVI-2001 > 0.425 and SP ≤ 0.38 MPa is identified as corresponding to Cluster 3. This is indicated by the numeral to the right of the box.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Classification tree obtained for Field 2 at k = 3. The interpretation is the same as that of Fig. 8.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy.