Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeleke, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Si, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zeleke, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Si, B. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zeleke, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Si, B. C.

Scaling Properties of Topographic Indices and Crop Yield

Multifractal and Joint Multifractal Approaches

Takele B. Zeleke and Bing Cheng Si*

Dep. of Soil Sci., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 5A8



View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The spatial distribution of the six variables along the transect: (a) measured variables (RE = relative elevation, YL = yield, and BM = biomass) and (b) calculated variables (USL = upslope length, WI = wetness index, and CR = curvature). The distance was measured from south to north.

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Natural logarithms of the normalized µ measures (partition functions) plotted against natural logarithms of the measurement scales for q values of 15 (filled triangle), 10 (open diamond), 5 (filled diamond), 2 (open square), 0 (filled square), –2 (open and inverted triangle), –5 (filled and inverted triangle), –10 (open circle), and –15 (filled circle). YL = yield, WI = wetness index, USL = upslope length, RE = relative elevation, BM = biomass, and CR = curvature.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The mass exponent (of the qth moment) evaluated at 0.5 increments in q values for (a) yield, (b) upslope length, (c) wetness index, and (d) biomass.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The generalized dimensions (Dq) at –10 to 10 ranges of q evaluated at 0.5 increments. YL = yield, USL = upslope length, WI = wetness index, and BM = aboveground biomass.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The multifractal spectrum [f({alpha})] for yield (YL), upslope length (USL), wetness index (WI), and biomass (BM) for q values of –10 to 10, evaluated at 0.5 increments.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Joint multifractal spectrum, f({alpha}, ß), for the joint distribution of (a) yield (YL) vs. upslope length (USL), (b) YL vs. wetness index (WI), (c) YL vs. aboveground biomass (BM), and (d) USL vs. WI evaluated for q and t values (order of exponents) ranging from –20 to 20.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy.