HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stiller, W. N. Articles by Constable, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stiller, W. N. Articles by Constable, G. A. Agricola Articles by Stiller, W. N. Articles by Constable, G. A. Related Collections Turfgrass Management Dryland Cropping Systems Cotton

Maturity and Leaf Shape as Traits Influencing Cotton Cultivar Adaptation to Dryland Conditions

CSIRO Plant Industry, Cotton Research Unit, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia

View larger version (26K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Association between irrigated and dryland lint yield for three sites (ACRI, Dalby, and Biloela), and mean of the three sites across six seasons. ACRI: y = 0.28x + 347.7 (r2 = 0.72, P 0.01); Dalby: y = 0.28x + 544.0 (r2 = 0.50, P 0.05); Biloela: y = 0.30x + 94.8 (r2 = 0.63, P 0.01); Mean: y = 0.33x + 257.8 (R2 = 0.77, P 0.01).

View larger version (18K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Association between lint yield and crop maturity [mean maturity date (MMD)] for three dryland and one irrigated experiment. Overall adjusted R2 is 70.0 (P 0.001). 1994–1995 dryland: y = –4171 + 34.4x; 1995–1996 dryland: y = –4487 + 34.4x; 1996–1997 dryland: y = –3732 + 34.4x; 1996–1997 irrigated: y = –3404 + 34.4x.