HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ribera, L. A. Articles by Richardson, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ribera, L. A. Articles by Richardson, J. W. Agricola Articles by Ribera, L. A. Articles by Richardson, J. W. Related Collections Economics Best Management Practices Dryland Cropping Systems Stochastic Processes Production Agriculture Statistics Tillage

An Economic Comparison between Conventional and No-Tillage Farming Systems in Burleson County, Texas

^a Dep. of Agric. Econ., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 78843-2124
^b Dep. of Soil and Crop Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 78843-2474

View larger version (34K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Cumulative distribution functions of net income under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems in Burleson County, Texas.

View larger version (31K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Certainty equivalents for net income of conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems in Burleson County, Texas. RAC, risk aversion coefficient.

View larger version (29K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Certainty equivalents for net income of conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems for five rotations in Burleson County, Texas. SWSB, sorghum–wheat–soybean (rotation); WSB, wheat–soybean (rotation); S, grain sorghum; W, wheat; SB, soybean.