HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sulc, R. M. Articles by van Santen, E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sulc, R. M. Articles by van Santen, E. Agricola Articles by Sulc, R. M. Articles by van Santen, E. Related Collections Forage Management Alfalfa Pest Management Systems Crop Ecology

Forage Quality of Potato Leafhopper Resistant and Susceptible Alfalfa Cultivars

^a Dep. of Hortic. and Crop Sci., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
^b Dep. of Agron., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
^c Dep. of Agron. and Plant Genet., Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
^d Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
^e Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849

View larger version (45K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Differences in forage quality of potato leafhopper resistant vs. susceptible alfalfa cultivar groups for individual harvests of control (no insecticide applied) and treated (insecticide applied) plots at four locations in 1996 and 1997. Each bar represents the magnitude of the resistant – susceptible group difference for an individual harvest. CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; IVDDM, in vitro digestible dry matter; *, the difference between the resistant and susceptible group mean was significant at P 0.05. , first harvest in 1996 at Minnesota was not sampled for forage quality.