Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fridgen, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Varco, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fridgen, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Varco, J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fridgen, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Varco, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Plant Analysis
Right arrow Plant Nutrition

Dependency of Cotton Leaf Nitrogen, Chlorophyll, and Reflectance on Nitrogen and Potassium Availability

Jennifer L. Fridgen and Jac J. Varco*

Dep. of Plant and Soil Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Graphical illustration of the standard error of prediction (SEP) vs. the number of factors used in the partial least-squares regression model.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Mean spectral reflectance of recently matured cotton leaves for each N rate at first bloom in 2000 with 112 kg K ha–1.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Predicted vs. actual leaf N concentrations at first bloom in 2000 obtained using partial least-squares regression to relate spectral reflectance data in the visible/near-infrared wavelength range to the reference leaf N values. The graphed line represents a 1:1 relationship. SEP, standard error of prediction.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Predicted vs. actual leaf N concentrations at peak bloom in 2000 obtained using partial least-squares regression to spectral reflectance data in the visible/near-infrared wavelength range to the reference leaf N values. The graphed line represents a 1:1 relationship. SEP, standard error of prediction.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Reflectance spectra and red-edge ({lambda}re) shift for healthy and N-deficient leaves with an adequate supply of K at (left) first bloom and (right) peak bloom in 2000.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy.