Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wuebker, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wuebker, M. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wuebker, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Animal Waste

Performance-Based Evaluations of Guidelines for Nitrogen Fertilizer Application after Animal Manure

David J. Hansena, Alfred M. Blackmer*,b, Antonio P. Mallarinob and Mark A. Wuebkerb

a Dep. of Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. of Delaware Res. and Educ. Cent., 16684 County Seat Hwy., Georgetown, DE 19947
b Dep. of Agron., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Relationships between corn yield responses to fertilizer N applied at 100 kg ha–1 and concentrations of soil (A) NO3–N to a depth of 30 cm, (B) NO3–N to a depth of 60 cm, (C) exchangeable NH4–N to a depth of 30 cm, and (D) exchangeable NH4–N and NO3–N to a depth of 60 cm.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relationships between rates of manure-N application and corn yield responses to fertilizer N applied at 100 kg ha–1 across (A) all sites and (B) sites treated with liquid swine manure that was injected into the soil.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relationship between soil pH and corn yield responses to fertilizer N applied at 100 kg ha–1.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationships between corn yield response to fertilizer N applied at 100 kg ha–1 and soil test (A) P and (B) K in the surface 30-cm layer.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Relationship between corn yield responses to fertilizer N applied at 100 kg ha–1 and corn yield levels with the applied fertilizer.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Relationship between published yield potentials of soils and corn yield responses to fertilizer N applied at 100 kg ha–1.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Relationship between soil organic matter concentrations and corn yield response to fertilizer N applied at 100 kg ha–1.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Relationships between rates of manure-N application and soil (A) NO3–N to a depth of 60 cm and (B) exchangeable NH4–N and NO3–N to a depth of 60 cm.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy.