Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by McNew, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by McNew, R. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Purcell, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by McNew, R. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Stress
Right arrow Statistics

Drought Avoidance Assessment for Summer Annual Crops Using Long-Term Weather Data

Larry C. Purcell*,a, Thomas R. Sinclairb and Ronald W. McNewc

a Univ. of Arkansas, Dep. of Crop, Soil, and Environ. Sci., 1366 W. Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
b USDA-ARS, Univ. of Florida, Agron. Physiol. and Genet. Lab., IFAS Bldg. no. 350, 2005 SW 23rd St., P.O. Box 110965, Gainesville, FL 32611-0965
c Agric. Stat. Lab., Agriculture Annex 101, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704



View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Cumulative probability (P) of (A) minimum temperature (Tmin) being less than indicated values on day of year (DOY) 75, 100, 125, and 125 at Urbana, IL, and (B) Tmin being less than 0°C and 5°C for each DOY at Urbana, IL.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cumulative probability (P) of 7-d running sum of water deficit being greater than 50 mm vs. day of year (DOY) for Athens, GA, and Fayetteville, AR. Shown is a regression of P values vs. DOY for Athens in the spring. Similar regression equations were made for each location as the P of water deficit increased in spring and decreased later in the year. The regression equations were used to determine the portion of the growing season in which P >= 0.20 for water deficit exceeded 50 mm.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (A) Long-term average values of water use efficiency during July and August vs. average maximum daily temperature during July and August and (B) average water use efficiency vs. the difference between maximum ( Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperatures for 16 locations in either the Midsouthern, Southeastern, Midwestern, or Northern Great Plains regions of the United States.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Average water use efficiency vs. day of year during the growing season for Tifton, GA; Stuttgart, AR; Urbana, IL, and Menno, SD.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Water deficit, averaged over 98 yr for each day of year at Urbana, IL, was calculated as the difference between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration using running sums for 7, 15, 21, and 27 d.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.