Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Vanlauwe, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Vanlauwe, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Vanlauwe, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Plant Analysis
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Tropical Soil Management

Rapid Characterization of Organic Resource Quality for Soil and Livestock Management in Tropical Agroecosystems Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Keith D. Shepherd*,a, Cheryl A. Palmb,c, Catherine N. Gachengob and Bernard Vanlauweb

a World Agroforestry Cent. (ICRAF), P.O. Box 30677-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
b Trop. Soil Biol. and Fertil. Inst. of CIAT (TSBF-CIAT), P.O. Box 30677-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
c The Earth Inst. at Columbia Univ., P.O. Box 1000, Palisades, NY 10964-8000



View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Portable spectrometer with high-intensity reflectance probe used for reflectance measurements. Samples are illuminated through the bottom of a glass Petri dish, and reflected light is captured from a 35-mm-diam. window through a fiber-optic cable.

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Reflectance spectra for selected contrasting materials from the organic resource spectral library.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Correlation of N, lignin, and total soluble polyphenol concentrations with first derivatives of relative reflectance at different wavelengths. Lignin and total soluble polyphenol were loge–transformed before processing.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Validation scatter plots of actual against predicted values for (top) N and (bottom) total soluble polyphenol concentrations. Calibration models were developed with TreeNet stochastic gradient boosting using a random selection of 75% of the total number of samples and validated on the remaining 25% holdout sample. No outliers were removed from either calibration or validation data sets. Root mean square errors (RMSE) are also given.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Response of (top) sensitivity and (bottom) specificity to size of training data set in spectral screening tests for high N (<25 mg kg-1), low lignin (<110 mg kg-1), and low total soluble polyphenol (<40 mg kg-1) concentrations. The results are for the proportion of the total data set (n = 319) not used for training. Sensitivity is the percentage of abnormal cases correctly classified, and specificity is the percentage of abnormal cases correctly classified.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.