Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newman, Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by Chambliss, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Newman, Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by Chambliss, C. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Newman, Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by Chambliss, C. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Grazing Management

Canopy Characteristics of Continuously Stocked Limpograss Swards Grazed to Different Heights

Yoana C. Newman, Lynn E. Sollenberger* and Carrol G. Chambliss

Agronomy Department, P.O. Box 110300, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0300



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diagram illustrating the top 5 cm (T-5 cm), upper (UL), and lower (LL) layers of grazed limpograss canopies. In each treatment UL = the upper 25% and LL = the lower 50% of the sward.

 


View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Total, leaf, and stem bulk density (BD) for different canopy heights and layers (top 5-cm layer, T-5 cm; upper layer, UL; lower layer, LL) of limpograss during 1998 and 1999. In each treatment UL = the upper 25% and LL = the lower 50% of the sward. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts are indicated for the effect of canopy height; L = linear, Q = quadratic, NS = not significant, {dagger} P <= 0.1, * P <= 0.05.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Leaf and stem percentage for different layers (top 5-cm layer, T-5 cm; upper layer, UL; lower layer, LL) of limpograss during 1998 and 1999. In each treatment UL = the upper 25% and LL = the lower 50% of the sward. Means are not different if followed by the same letter (P > 0.1).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Leaf CP and IVOMD for different canopy heights (20, 40, and 60 cm) and layers (top 5-cm layer, T-5 cm; upper layer, UL; lower layer, LL) of limpograss across years. Means are not different if followed by the same letter (P > 0.1). Orthogonal polynomial contrasts are indicated for the effect of canopy height; L = linear, Q = quadratic, {dagger} P <= 0.1, * P <= 0.05, ** P <= 0.01.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.