Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flowers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Heiniger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Flowers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Heiniger, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Flowers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Heiniger, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Remote Sensing
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Quantitative Approaches for Using Color Infrared Photography for Assessing In-Season Nitrogen Status in Winter Wheat

Michael Flowers*,a, Randall Weiszb and Ronnie Heinigerc

a USDA-ARS, Air Quality–Plant Growth and Development Research Unit, 3908 Inwood Rd., Raleigh, NC 27603
b Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
c Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Vernon James Res. and Ext. Center, 207 Research Rd., Plymouth, NC 27962



View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Map of North Carolina. Site names are given adjacent to stars indicating site location.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The coefficient of determination (R2) for the linear or quadratic model between growth stage (GS)-30 whole-plant N concentration and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) vs. mean GS-30 biomass.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) vs. growth stage (GS)-30 whole-plant N concentration for the four site–years with high (>1000 kg ha-1) mean GS-30 biomass.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) vs. growth stage (GS)-30 N uptake for five site–years without Hessian fly infestations. Note P-1 was not separated by variety.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) sufficiency index vs. growth stage (GS)-30 whole-plant N concentration for four site–years with high (>1000 kg ha-1) GS-30 mean biomass.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) sufficiency index vs. growth stage (GS)-30 N uptake for four site–years with high (135 kg N ha-1) reference locations and without Hessian fly infestations.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Relationship between PredNRateNConcentrationBased vs. the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for four site–years with high (>1000 kg ha-1) growth stage (GS)-30 biomass. Equation [7] was used to calculate PredNRateNConcentrationBased based on GS-30 whole-plant N concentration.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Relationship between PredNRateNUptakeBased vs. the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for five site–years. Equation [8] was used to calculate PredNRateNUptakeBased based on growth stage (GS) 30 N uptake. Note P-1 was not separated by variety.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Failure of growth stage (GS)-30 N uptake to distinguish between N deficient and N sufficient sample locations. Data are identical to those shown in Fig. 5 and 8; however, filled symbols represent sample locations with N deficiency based on the critical value of 39.5 g kg-1 for GS-30 whole-plant N concentration (Scharf et al., 1993). Open symbols represent sample locations with sufficient N also based on 39.5 g kg-1 for GS-30 whole-plant N concentration. (A) NDVI vs. GS-30 N uptake; (B) PredNRateNUptakeBased calculated from GS-30 N uptake (Eq. [8]) vs. NDVI.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.