Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lark, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lark, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, H. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lark, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, H. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Statistics
Right arrow Field-Scale Studies
Right arrow Experiment Design
Right arrow Biometrics

A Method to Investigate Within-Field Variation of the Response of Combinable Crops to an Input

R. M. Lark* and H. C. Wheeler

Silsoe Res. Inst., Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford, UK MK45 4HS



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Notional probability distribution for transition times for a grain from cutter bar to flow sensor. The time shift ts and the dispersion of this process (the variability of the transition times) are illustrated.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Normalized weights, w'zi, in the discrete linear filter (see Eq. [22]). The position along the path relative to the nominal position of a yield datum is denoted by zi (m).

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Correlation ({rho}) between monitor yields Y(x) and filtered transformed N rate *n(x) for different values of the response function parameter R (see Eq. [8]). Note that there are many data points that are not shown for neatness. The graph is formed by a straight line joining each point.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Overall response function fitted using (bold line) monitor yields Y(x) and filtered transformed N rate *n(x) and (thin line) monitor yields Y(x) and nominal N rate n(x).

 


View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Local optimum N rate at grid nodes across Bypass field. The coordinates are in meters and are relative to the datum of the United Kingdom Ordnance Survey.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Histogram of bootstrapped estimates of the standard deviation of the b parameter, Sb, under the null hypothesis for grid nodes on Bypass field. The standard deviation of the b values fitted to the experimental data was 0.69; this value is indicated on the abscissa by the impulse symbol (arrow).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.